These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2625418)

  • 1. The effects of a glycerin-based blood analog on the testing of bioprosthetic heart valves.
    Carey RF; Herman BA
    J Biomech; 1989; 22(11-12):1185-92. PubMed ID: 2625418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dependence of tissue valve leaflet motion on the viscosity of blood analogue fluid.
    Chandran KB; Fatemi R; Schoephoerster R
    Life Support Syst; 1986; 4(4):289-303. PubMed ID: 3561030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fluid Dynamic Characterization of Transcatheter Aortic Valves Using Particle Image Velocimetry.
    Barakat M; Dvir D; Azadani AN
    Artif Organs; 2018 Nov; 42(11):E357-E368. PubMed ID: 30198167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Characterization of Effective Orifice Areas of Mitral Prosthetic Heart Valves: An In-Vitro Study.
    Evin M; Magne J; Grieve SM; Rieu R; Pibarot P
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2017 Nov; 26(6):677-687. PubMed ID: 30207118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro evaluation of six mechanical and six bioprosthetic valves.
    Fisher J; Reece IJ; Wheatley DJ
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Jun; 34(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 2426828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of valve calcification on systolic and diastolic valvular function--an in vitro model.
    Dzemali O; Bakhtiary F; Steinseiffer U; Schmitz C; Glasmacher B; Moritz A; Kleine P
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2008 Dec; 49(6):817-24. PubMed ID: 19043396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of Clinically Relevant Elliptical Deformations on the Damage Patterns of Sagging and Stretched Leaflets in a Bioprosthetic Heart Valve.
    Sritharan D; Fathi P; Weaver JD; Retta SM; Wu C; Duraiswamy N
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Sep; 9(3):351-364. PubMed ID: 29948838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of ventricular input impedance on the hydrodynamic performance of bioprosthetic aortic roots in vitro.
    Jennings LM; Butterfield M; Walker PG; Watterson KG; Fisher J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Mar; 10(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 11297215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Aortic valve-in-valve implantation: impact of transcatheter- bioprosthesis size mismatch.
    Azadani AN; Jaussaud N; Matthews PB; Chuter TA; Ge L; Guy TS; Guccione J; Tseng EE
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2009 Jul; 18(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 19852139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fluid mechanics of heart valves.
    Yoganathan AP; He Z; Casey Jones S
    Annu Rev Biomed Eng; 2004; 6():331-62. PubMed ID: 15255773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hemodynamic Performance of Endovascular Valves as Valve-in-Valve in Small Stented Bioprosthesis.
    Kuehnel RU; Hartrumpf M; Erb M; Albes JM
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Apr; 65(3):225-230. PubMed ID: 27517167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available tissue valves.
    Gerosa G; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Bottio T
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 May; 131(5):1058-64. PubMed ID: 16678590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characterization of a bioprosthetic bicuspid venous valve hemodynamics: implications for mechanism of valve dynamics.
    Tien WH; Chen HY; Berwick ZC; Krieger J; Chambers S; Dabiri D; Kassab GS
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2014 Oct; 48(4):459-64. PubMed ID: 25150441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computer modelling of bioprosthetic heart valves.
    Christie GW
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1992; 6 Suppl 1():S95-100; discussion S101. PubMed ID: 1389288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In-vitro hemodynamics of stented bioprosthetic heart valves in the tilted implantation position.
    Babin-Ebell J; Sievers HH; Misfeld M; Runge M; Vogt PR; Scharfschwerdt M
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Sep; 17(5):566-70. PubMed ID: 18980091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fluid mechanics of artificial heart valves.
    Dasi LP; Simon HA; Sucosky P; Yoganathan AP
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2009 Feb; 36(2):225-37. PubMed ID: 19220329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hemodynamic comparisons of polyurethane trileaflet and bioprosthetic heart valves.
    Chandran KB; Schoephoerster RT; Wurzel D; Hansen G; Yu LS; Pantalos G; Kolff WJ
    ASAIO Trans; 1989; 35(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 2730811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of outcomes in men 11 years after heart-valve replacement with a mechanical valve or bioprosthesis. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study on Valvular Heart Disease.
    Hammermeister KE; Sethi GK; Henderson WG; Oprian C; Kim T; Rahimtoola S
    N Engl J Med; 1993 May; 328(18):1289-96. PubMed ID: 8469251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. St Jude Epic heart valve bioprostheses versus native human and porcine aortic valves - comparison of mechanical properties.
    Kalejs M; Stradins P; Lacis R; Ozolanta I; Pavars J; Kasyanov V
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 May; 8(5):553-6. PubMed ID: 19190025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fluid-Structure Interaction Models of Bioprosthetic Heart Valve Dynamics in an Experimental Pulse Duplicator.
    Lee JH; Rygg AD; Kolahdouz EM; Rossi S; Retta SM; Duraiswamy N; Scotten LN; Craven BA; Griffith BE
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2020 May; 48(5):1475-1490. PubMed ID: 32034607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.