These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2625492)

  • 1. Estimation of genetic parameters for milk and fat yields of dairy cattle in Spain and the United States.
    Carabaño MJ; Van Vleck LD; Wiggans GR; Alenda R
    J Dairy Sci; 1989 Nov; 72(11):3013-22. PubMed ID: 2625492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genetic analysis of Holstein cattle populations in Brazil and the United States.
    Costa CN; Blake RW; Pollak EJ; Oltenacu PA; Quaas RL; Searle SR
    J Dairy Sci; 2000 Dec; 83(12):2963-74. PubMed ID: 11132868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Within-herd heritability estimated with daughter-parent regression for yield and somatic cell score.
    Dechow CD; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Jan; 90(1):482-92. PubMed ID: 17183117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genotype x environment interaction for milk yield in Holsteins using Luxembourg and Tunisian populations.
    Hammami H; Rekik B; Soyeurt H; Bastin C; Stoll J; Gengler N
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Sep; 91(9):3661-71. PubMed ID: 18765624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Environmental sensitivity for milk yield in Luxembourg and Tunisian Holsteins by herd management level.
    Hammami H; Rekik B; Bastin C; Soyeurt H; Bormann J; Stoll J; Gengler N
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Sep; 92(9):4604-12. PubMed ID: 19700723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of genotype by environment interaction for milk yield traits in first lactation of Simmental cattle.
    Gerber A; Krogmeier D; Emmerling R; Götz KU
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2008 Dec; 125(6):382-9. PubMed ID: 19134073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genotype by environment interaction for production traits while accounting for heteroscedasticity.
    Fahey AG; Schutz MM; Lofgren DL; Schinckel AP; Stewart TS
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Aug; 90(8):3889-99. PubMed ID: 17639000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genetic parameters and responses of linear type, yield traits, and somatic cell scores to divergent selection for predicted transmitting ability for type in Holsteins.
    DeGroot BJ; Keown JF; Van Vleck LD; Marotz EL
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Jun; 85(6):1578-85. PubMed ID: 12146490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Variance components for test-day milk, fat, and protein yield, and somatic cell score for analyzing management information.
    Caccamo M; Veerkamp RF; de Jong G; Pool MH; Petriglieri R; Licitra G
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Aug; 91(8):3268-76. PubMed ID: 18650304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accessing genotype by environment interaction using within- and across-country test-day random regression sire models.
    Hammami H; Rekik B; Soyeurt H; Bastin C; Bay E; Stoll J; Gengler N
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2009 Oct; 126(5):366-77. PubMed ID: 19765163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genotype by environment interaction for yield and somatic cell score with alternative environmental definitions.
    Raffrenato E; Blake RW; Oltenacu PA; Carvalheira J; Licitra G
    J Dairy Sci; 2003 Jul; 86(7):2470-9. PubMed ID: 12906065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selection response for milk production in conventional production systems in Mexico, using genetic evaluations of Holstein sires from Canada and the United States.
    Montaldo HH; Núñez-Soto SG; Ruiz-López FJ; Castillo-Juárez H
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5270-5. PubMed ID: 19762845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genetic parameters of milk yield and composition and their relationships with alternative breeding goals.
    de Jager D; Kennedy BW
    J Dairy Sci; 1987 Jun; 70(6):1258-66. PubMed ID: 3611483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genotype x environment interaction for grazing versus confinement. I. Production traits.
    Kearney JF; Schutz MM; Boettcher PJ; Weigel KA
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Feb; 87(2):501-9. PubMed ID: 14762093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variance-covariance components associated with trimester yields of milk and fat and multiple trait sire evaluation for trimester yields.
    Agyemang K; Clapp EC; Van Vleck LD
    J Dairy Sci; 1985 May; 68(5):1233-40. PubMed ID: 3842861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic evaluation of dairy cattle with test-day models with autoregressive covariance structures and with a 305-d model.
    Sawalha RM; Keown JF; Kachman SD; Van Vleck LD
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Sep; 88(9):3346-53. PubMed ID: 16107425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genotype by environment interaction for fertility, survival, and milk production traits in Australian dairy cattle.
    Haile-Mariam M; Carrick MJ; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Dec; 91(12):4840-53. PubMed ID: 19038960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genetic parameters for yield traits of Holsteins, including lactose and somatic cell score.
    Welper RD; Freeman AE
    J Dairy Sci; 1992 May; 75(5):1342-8. PubMed ID: 1597589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. International genetic evaluation of dairy sires using a multiple-trait model with individual animal performance records.
    Weigel KA; Rekaya R; Zwald NR; Fikse WF
    J Dairy Sci; 2001 Dec; 84(12):2789-95. PubMed ID: 11814036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of test-day records beyond three hundred five days for estimation of three hundred five-day breeding values for production traits and somatic cell score of Canadian Holsteins.
    Bohmanova J; Miglior F; Jamrozik J
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5314-25. PubMed ID: 19762849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.