463 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26255088)
21. Effect of the initiation of progesterone supplementation in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer outcomes: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Gao J; Gu F; Miao BY; Chen MH; Zhou CQ; Xu YW
Fertil Steril; 2018 Jan; 109(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 29175065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Prospective controlled study to evaluate laboratory and clinical outcomes of oocyte vitrification obtained in in vitro fertilization patients aged 30 to 39 years.
Chang CC; Elliott TA; Wright G; Shapiro DB; Toledo AA; Nagy ZP
Fertil Steril; 2013 Jun; 99(7):1891-7. PubMed ID: 23481277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Morphologic grading of euploid blastocysts influences implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates.
Irani M; Reichman D; Robles A; Melnick A; Davis O; Zaninovic N; Xu K; Rosenwaks Z
Fertil Steril; 2017 Mar; 107(3):664-670. PubMed ID: 28069172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Outcomes of vitrified early cleavage-stage and blastocyst-stage embryos in a cryopreservation program: evaluation of 3,150 warming cycles.
Cobo A; de los Santos MJ; Castellò D; Gámiz P; Campos P; Remohí J
Fertil Steril; 2012 Nov; 98(5):1138-46.e1. PubMed ID: 22862909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Ongoing and cumulative pregnancy rate after cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer using vitrification for cryopreservation: impact of age on the results.
Fernández-Shaw S; Cercas R; Braña C; Villas C; Pons I
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2015 Feb; 32(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 25403438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A prospective pilot study comparing fertilization and embryo development between fresh and vitrified sibling oocytes.
Siano L; Engmann L; Nulsen J; Benadiva C
Conn Med; 2013 Apr; 77(4):211-7. PubMed ID: 23691734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Delivery rate using cryopreserved oocytes is comparable to conventional in vitro fertilization using fresh oocytes: potential fertility preservation for female cancer patients.
Grifo JA; Noyes N
Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(2):391-6. PubMed ID: 19439285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in patients who failed to conceive in three or more day 2-3 embryo transfer cycles: a prospective, randomized study.
Levitas E; Lunenfeld E; Har-Vardi I; Albotiano S; Sonin Y; Hackmon-Ram R; Potashnik G
Fertil Steril; 2004 Mar; 81(3):567-71. PubMed ID: 15037404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Difference in birth weight of consecutive sibling singletons is not found in oocyte donation when comparing fresh versus frozen embryo replacements.
Galliano D; Garrido N; Serra-Serra V; Pellicer A
Fertil Steril; 2015 Dec; 104(6):1411-8.e1-3. PubMed ID: 26363384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Vitrified blastocyst transfer cycles with the use of only vaginal progesterone replacement with Endometrin have inferior ongoing pregnancy rates: results from the planned interim analysis of a three-arm randomized controlled noninferiority trial.
Devine K; Richter KS; Widra EA; McKeeby JL
Fertil Steril; 2018 Feb; 109(2):266-275. PubMed ID: 29338855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Impact of multiple blastocyst biopsy and vitrification-warming procedures on pregnancy outcomes.
Bradley CK; Livingstone M; Traversa MV; McArthur SJ
Fertil Steril; 2017 Dec; 108(6):999-1006. PubMed ID: 29100625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes in blastocyst-stage biopsy with frozen embryo transfer and cleavage-stage biopsy with fresh embryo transfer after preimplantation genetic diagnosis/screening.
Jing S; Luo K; He H; Lu C; Zhang S; Tan Y; Gong F; Lu G; Lin G
Fertil Steril; 2016 Jul; 106(1):105-112.e4. PubMed ID: 27005274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Noninferiority, randomized, controlled trial comparing embryo development using media developed for sequential or undisturbed culture in a time-lapse setup.
Hardarson T; Bungum M; Conaghan J; Meintjes M; Chantilis SJ; Molnar L; Gunnarsson K; Wikland M
Fertil Steril; 2015 Dec; 104(6):1452-9.e1-4. PubMed ID: 26409153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study.
Li Z; Wang YA; Ledger W; Edgar DH; Sullivan EA
Hum Reprod; 2014 Dec; 29(12):2794-801. PubMed ID: 25316444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A "freeze-all" embryo strategy after in vitro maturation: a novel approach in women with polycystic ovary syndrome?
Ortega-Hrepich C; Stoop D; Guzmán L; Van Landuyt L; Tournaye H; Smitz J; De Vos M
Fertil Steril; 2013 Oct; 100(4):1002-7. PubMed ID: 23850301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Live birth after fresh versus frozen single blastocyst transfer (Frefro-blastocyst): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Wei D; Sun Y; Liu J; Liang X; Zhu Y; Shi Y; Chen ZJ
Trials; 2017 Jun; 18(1):253. PubMed ID: 28583140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Initiation of ovarian stimulation independent of the menstrual cycle: a case-control study.
Buendgen NK; Schultze-Mosgau A; Cordes T; Diedrich K; Griesinger G
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Oct; 288(4):901-4. PubMed ID: 23545834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Clinical application of oocyte vitrification: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Cobo A; Diaz C
Fertil Steril; 2011 Aug; 96(2):277-85. PubMed ID: 21718983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. No advantage of fresh blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer in women under the age of 39: a randomized controlled study.
Levi-Setti PE; Cirillo F; Smeraldi A; Morenghi E; Mulazzani GEG; Albani E
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2018 Mar; 35(3):457-465. PubMed ID: 29168022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Embryo cryopreservation rescues cycles with premature luteinization.
Shapiro BS; Daneshmand ST; Garner FC; Aguirre M; Hudson C; Thomas S
Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(2):636-41. PubMed ID: 19296941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
