These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26255598)

  • 1. Biofilm formation and ethanol inhibition by bacterial contaminants of biofuel fermentation.
    Rich JO; Leathers TD; Bischoff KM; Anderson AM; Nunnally MS
    Bioresour Technol; 2015 Nov; 196():347-54. PubMed ID: 26255598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inhibitors of biofilm formation by biofuel fermentation contaminants.
    Leathers TD; Bischoff KM; Rich JO; Price NPJ; Manitchotpisit P; Nunnally MS; Anderson AM
    Bioresour Technol; 2014 Oct; 169():45-51. PubMed ID: 25022836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biofilm formation and antimicrobial sensitivity of lactobacilli contaminants from sugarcane-based fuel ethanol fermentation.
    Dellias MTF; Borges CD; Lopes ML; da Cruz SH; de Amorim HV; Tsai SM
    Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2018 Sep; 111(9):1631-1644. PubMed ID: 29478220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inhibition of Lactobacillus biofilm growth in fuel ethanol fermentations by Bacillus.
    Saunders LP; Bischoff KM; Bowman MJ; Leathers TD
    Bioresour Technol; 2019 Jan; 272():156-161. PubMed ID: 30336397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bacterial contaminants of fuel ethanol production.
    Skinner KA; Leathers TD
    J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol; 2004 Oct; 31(9):401-8. PubMed ID: 15338420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rapid evaluation of the antibiotic susceptibility of fuel ethanol contaminant biofilms.
    Rich JO; Leathers TD; Nunnally MS; Bischoff KM
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jan; 102(2):1124-30. PubMed ID: 20855199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microbial contamination of fuel ethanol fermentations.
    Beckner M; Ivey ML; Phister TG
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2011 Oct; 53(4):387-94. PubMed ID: 21770989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interaction of Saccharomyces cerevisiae-Lactobacillus fermentum-Dekkera bruxellensis and feedstock on fuel ethanol fermentation.
    Bassi APG; Meneguello L; Paraluppi AL; Sanches BCP; Ceccato-Antonini SR
    Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2018 Sep; 111(9):1661-1672. PubMed ID: 29488182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Lactobacillus species isolated from commercial ethanol plants.
    Bischoff KM; Skinner-Nemec KA; Leathers TD
    J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 Nov; 34(11):739-44. PubMed ID: 17726620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Yeast Derived LysA2 Can Control Bacterial Contamination in Ethanol Fermentation.
    Kim JS; Daum MA; Jin YS; Miller MJ
    Viruses; 2018 May; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 29795003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reducing bacterial contamination in fuel ethanol fermentations by ozone treatment of uncooked corn mash.
    Rasmussen ML; Koziel JA; Jane JL; Pometto AL
    J Agric Food Chem; 2015 Jun; 63(21):5239-48. PubMed ID: 25966035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Homo- and heterofermentative lactobacilli differently affect sugarcane-based fuel ethanol fermentation.
    Basso TO; Gomes FS; Lopes ML; de Amorim HV; Eggleston G; Basso LC
    Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2014 Jan; 105(1):169-77. PubMed ID: 24198118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of yeast inoculation rate on the metabolism of contaminating lactobacilli during fermentation of corn mash.
    Narendranath NV; Power R
    J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol; 2004 Dec; 31(12):581-4. PubMed ID: 15599666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of Lactobacillus buchneri and Lactobacillus plantarum on the fermentation, aerobic stability, and ruminal degradability of low dry matter corn and sorghum silages.
    Filya I
    J Dairy Sci; 2003 Nov; 86(11):3575-81. PubMed ID: 14672188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bacteriophage application restores ethanol fermentation characteristics disrupted by Lactobacillus fermentum.
    Liu M; Bischoff KM; Gill JJ; Mire-Criscione MD; Berry JD; Young R; Summer EJ
    Biotechnol Biofuels; 2015; 8():132. PubMed ID: 26339290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of Lactobacillus buchneri 40788 or Lactobacillus plantarum MTD-1 on the fermentation and aerobic stability of corn silages ensiled at two dry matter contents.
    Hu W; Schmidt RJ; McDonell EE; Klingerman CM; Kung L
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Aug; 92(8):3907-14. PubMed ID: 19620673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Yeasts and lactic acid bacteria mixed-specie biofilm formation is a promising cell immobilization technology for ethanol fermentation.
    Abe A; Furukawa S; Watanabe S; Morinaga Y
    Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2013 Sep; 171(1):72-9. PubMed ID: 23817789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Protease increases fermentation rate and ethanol yield in dry-grind ethanol production.
    Johnston DB; McAloon AJ
    Bioresour Technol; 2014 Feb; 154():18-25. PubMed ID: 24378840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bacterial Community Structure and Dynamics During Corn-Based Bioethanol Fermentation.
    Li Q; Heist EP; Moe LA
    Microb Ecol; 2016 Feb; 71(2):409-21. PubMed ID: 26381538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of co-products of enzyme-assisted aqueous extraction of soybeans on ethanol production in dry-grind corn fermentation.
    Sekhon JK; Jung S; Wang T; Rosentrater KA; Johnson LA
    Bioresour Technol; 2015 Sep; 192():451-60. PubMed ID: 26080102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.