These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1017 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26256304)

  • 1. Handwriting Evidence in Federal Courts - From Frye to Kumho.
    Zlotnick J; Lin JR
    Forensic Sci Rev; 2001 Jul; 13(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 26256304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Kumho, Daubert, and the nature of scientific inquiry: implications for forensic anthropology.
    Grivas CR; Komar DA
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jul; 53(4):771-6. PubMed ID: 18489550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative EEG and the Frye and Daubert standards of admissibility.
    Thatcher RW; Biver CJ; North DM
    Clin Electroencephalogr; 2003 Apr; 34(2):39-53. PubMed ID: 12784902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Forensic identification science evidence since Daubert: Part I--A quantitative analysis of the exclusion of forensic identification science evidence.
    Page M; Taylor J; Blenkin M
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Sep; 56(5):1180-4. PubMed ID: 21884119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Admissibility of scientific evidence in courts.
    Davies J
    Med Law; 2005 Jun; 24(2):243-57. PubMed ID: 16082863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Meeting a Forensic Podiatry Admissibility Challenge: A Daubert Case Study.
    Nirenberg M
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 May; 61(3):833-841. PubMed ID: 27122428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Capillary electrophoresis in court: the landmark decision of the People of Tennessee versus Ware.
    Marchi E; Pasacreta RJ
    J Capillary Electrophor; 1997; 4(4):145-56. PubMed ID: 9627830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Admissibility of scientific evidence post-Daubert.
    Masten J; Strzelczyk JJ
    Health Phys; 2001 Dec; 81(6):678-82. PubMed ID: 11725886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals: a new standard for scientific evidence in the courts?
    Zonana H
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):309-25. PubMed ID: 7841504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Admissibility and per se exclusion of hypnotically elicited recall in American courts of law.
    Perry C
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1997 Jul; 45(3):266-79. PubMed ID: 9204639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. Carmichael.
    Grudzinskas AJ
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(3):482-8. PubMed ID: 10509947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neurolitigation: a perspective on the elements of expert testimony for extending the Daubert challenge.
    Klee CH; Friedman HJ
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 11568465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Psychological expert witness testimony and judicial decision making trends.
    Shapiro DL; Mixon L; Jackson M; Shook J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():149-53. PubMed ID: 26341310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The admissibility of offender profiling in courtroom: a review of legal issues and court opinions.
    Bosco D; Zappalà A; Santtila P
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2010; 33(3):184-91. PubMed ID: 20416950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Expert scientific evidence in the Israeli court.
    Sahar A
    Med Law; 2007 Jun; 26(2):257-82. PubMed ID: 17639850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of Daubert on the admissibility of forensic anthropology expert testimony.
    Lesciotto KM
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 May; 60(3):549-55. PubMed ID: 25716577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ten years after Daubert: the status of the states.
    Keierleber JA; Bohan TL
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 Sep; 50(5):1154-63. PubMed ID: 16225224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What has a decade of Daubert wrought?
    Berger MA
    Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S59-65. PubMed ID: 16030340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The physician expert witness and the U.S. Supreme court--an epidemiologic approach.
    Norton ML
    Med Law; 2002; 21(3):435-49. PubMed ID: 12437195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application of the Supreme Court's Daubert criteria in radiation litigation.
    Merwin SE; Moeller DW; Kennedy WE; Moeller MP
    Health Phys; 2001 Dec; 81(6):670-7. PubMed ID: 11725885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 51.