1104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26256441)
21. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
Wolfe J; Baker S; Caraway T; Kasulis H; Mears A; Smith J; Swim L; Wood M
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cochlear Implants in Adults: Effects of Age and Duration of Deafness on Speech Recognition.
Beyea JA; McMullen KP; Harris MS; Houston DM; Martin JM; Bolster VA; Adunka OF; Moberly AC
Otol Neurotol; 2016 Oct; 37(9):1238-45. PubMed ID: 27466894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Behavioral Measures of Temporal Processing and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
Blankenship C; Zhang F; Keith R
J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Oct; 27(9):701-713. PubMed ID: 27718347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. What to Do When Cochlear Implant Users Plateau in Performance: a Pilot Study of Clinician-guided Aural Rehabilitation.
Moberly AC; Vasil K; Baxter J; Ray C
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Oct; 39(9):e794-e802. PubMed ID: 30199497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Assessment of Speech Understanding After Cochlear Implantation in Adult Hearing Aid Users: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.
Buchman CA; Herzog JA; McJunkin JL; Wick CC; Durakovic N; Firszt JB; Kallogjeri D;
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 Oct; 146(10):916-924. PubMed ID: 32857113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Results with cochlear implantation in adults with speech recognition scores exceeding current criteria.
Amoodi HA; Mick PT; Shipp DB; Friesen LM; Nedzelski JM; Chen JM; Lin VY
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jan; 33(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 22090001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Audiovisual Processing Skills Before Cochlear Implantation Predict Postoperative Speech Recognition in Adults.
Moberly AC; Pisoni DB; Tamati TN
Ear Hear; 2024 May-Jun 01; 45(3):617-625. PubMed ID: 38143302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Word and Nonword Reading Efficiency in Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
Tamati TN; Vasil KJ; Kronenberger WG; Pisoni DB; Moberly AC; Ray C
Otol Neurotol; 2021 Mar; 42(3):e272-e278. PubMed ID: 33306660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Differential cochlear implant outcomes in older adults.
Roberts DS; Lin HW; Herrmann BS; Lee DJ
Laryngoscope; 2013 Aug; 123(8):1952-6. PubMed ID: 23737286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Functional benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children with long inter-stage interval between two implants.
Kim JS; Kim LS; Jeong SW
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Feb; 77(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 23137855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Hearing and Quality-of-Life Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation in Adult Hearing Aid Users 65 Years or Older: A Secondary Analysis of a Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.
Wick CC; Kallogjeri D; McJunkin JL; Durakovic N; Holden LK; Herzog JA; Firszt JB; Buchman CA;
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 Oct; 146(10):925-932. PubMed ID: 32857114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cochlear implants with fine structure processing improve speech and tone perception in Mandarin-speaking adults.
Chen X; Liu B; Liu S; Mo L; Li Y; Kong Y; Zheng J; Li Y; Gong S; Han D
Acta Otolaryngol; 2013 Jul; 133(7):733-8. PubMed ID: 23768059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Speech intelligibility as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome in prelingually deafened adults.
van Dijkhuizen JN; Beers M; Boermans PP; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):445-58. PubMed ID: 21258238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cochlear implant performance in geriatric patients.
Lenarz M; Sönmez H; Joseph G; Büchner A; Lenarz T
Laryngoscope; 2012 Jun; 122(6):1361-5. PubMed ID: 22539093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Speech intelligibility and subjective benefit in single-sided deaf adults after cochlear implantation.
Finke M; Strauß-Schier A; Kludt E; Büchner A; Illg A
Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():112-119. PubMed ID: 28286233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. (Even Off-Label) Cochlear Implantation in Single-Sided Deafness and Asymmetric Hearing Loss Results in Measurable Objective and Subjective Benefit.
Sydlowski SA; Farrokhian N; Carrozza M; Jamis C; Woodson E
Otol Neurotol; 2022 Sep; 43(8):e895-e902. PubMed ID: 35970168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Musical background not associated with self-perceived hearing performance or speech perception in postlingual cochlear-implant users.
Fuller C; Free R; Maat B; Başkent D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1009-16. PubMed ID: 22894221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Word Recognition Variability With Cochlear Implants: "Perceptual Attention" Versus "Auditory Sensitivity".
Moberly AC; Lowenstein JH; Nittrouer S
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 26301844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Quality of life in cochlear implantees: comparing utility values obtained through the Medical Outcome Study Short-Form Survey-6D and the Health Utility Index Mark 3.
Arnoldner C; Lin VY; Bresler R; Kaider A; Kuthubutheen J; Shipp D; Chen JM
Laryngoscope; 2014 Nov; 124(11):2586-90. PubMed ID: 24536018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing.
Gantz BJ; Turner C; Gfeller KE; Lowder MW
Laryngoscope; 2005 May; 115(5):796-802. PubMed ID: 15867642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
