These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Comparative reproducibility of the digital photogrammetric procedure utilizing three methods of stereophotography. Rosenthal AR; Kottler MS; Donaldson DD; Falconer DG Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1977 Jan; 16(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 832965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Determination of the real size of fundus objects from fundus photographs. Coleman AL; Haller JA; Quigley HA J Glaucoma; 1996 Dec; 5(6):433-5. PubMed ID: 8946302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Dark-room methods of enhancing details in diabetic fundus photographs: a preliminary study. Shakespeare AR Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1987; 7(4):387-92. PubMed ID: 3454913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Automated quality evaluation of digital fundus photographs. Bartling H; Wanger P; Martin L Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 Sep; 87(6):643-7. PubMed ID: 19719806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Screening for age-related macular degeneration using nonstereo digital fundus photographs. Jain S; Hamada S; Membrey WL; Chong V Eye (Lond); 2006 Apr; 20(4):471-5. PubMed ID: 15895024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Oral fluorescein angiography with the confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Garcia CR; Rivero ME; Bartsch DU; Ishiko S; Takamiya A; Fukui K; Hirokawa H; Clark T; Yoshida A; Freeman WR Ophthalmology; 1999 Jun; 106(6):1114-8. PubMed ID: 10366079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Three-dimension reconstruction of ocular fundus image]. Chen J; Peng C Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Feb; 25(1):177-81. PubMed ID: 18435285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Concordance in diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy by fundus photography between retina specialists and a standardized reading center. Mexico City Diabetes Study Retinopathy Group. Gonzalez ME; Gonzalez C; Stern MP; Arredondo B; Martinez S Arch Med Res; 1995; 26(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 7620277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Screening for sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy: comparison of fundus photography with automated color contrast threshold test. Ong GL; Ripley LG; Newsom RS; Cooper M; Casswell AG Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Mar; 137(3):445-52. PubMed ID: 15013866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A fundus camera dedicated to the screening of diabetic retinopathy in the primary-care physician's office. Zeimer R; Zou S; Meeder T; Quinn K; Vitale S Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 May; 43(5):1581-7. PubMed ID: 11980877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Detecting cataract causing visual impairment using a nonmydriatic fundus camera. Ferraro JG; Pollard T; Muller A; Lamoureux EL; Taylor HR Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Apr; 139(4):725-6. PubMed ID: 15808179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of mydriasis and different field strategies on digital image screening of diabetic eye disease. Murgatroyd H; Ellingford A; Cox A; Binnie M; Ellis JD; MacEwen CJ; Leese GP Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 88(7):920-4. PubMed ID: 15205238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A photographic method of diet evaluation. Elwood PC; Bird G Hum Nutr Appl Nutr; 1983 Dec; 37(6):474-7. PubMed ID: 6662735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Estimation of projection errors in human ocular fundus imaging. Doelemeyer A; Petrig BL Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2000 Mar; 20(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 10829133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]