These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26258076)

  • 21. Emergency department triage: do experienced nurses agree on triage scores?
    Dallaire C; Poitras J; Aubin K; Lavoie A; Moore L
    J Emerg Med; 2012 Jun; 42(6):736-40. PubMed ID: 22209550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reliability of triage systems for paediatric emergency care: a systematic review.
    Magalhães-Barbosa MC; Robaina JR; Prata-Barbosa A; Lopes CS
    Emerg Med J; 2019 Apr; 36(4):231-238. PubMed ID: 30630838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Predictive validity of a computerized emergency triage tool.
    Dong SL; Bullard MJ; Meurer DP; Blitz S; Akhmetshin E; Ohinmaa A; Holroyd BR; Rowe BH
    Acad Emerg Med; 2007 Jan; 14(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 17200513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Emergency Severity Index version 4: a valid and reliable tool in pediatric emergency department triage.
    Green NA; Durani Y; Brecher D; DePiero A; Loiselle J; Attia M
    Pediatr Emerg Care; 2012 Aug; 28(8):753-7. PubMed ID: 22858740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of Canadian triage acuity scale to Australian Emergency Mental Health Scale triage system for psychiatric patients.
    Downey LV; Zun LS; Burke T
    Int Emerg Nurs; 2015 Apr; 23(2):138-43. PubMed ID: 25082415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Efficacy of implementation of a 5 scale pediatric triage and acuity scale in pediatric emergency, Saudi Arabia.
    Al-Hindi AA; Al-Akhfash AA; Fareed AM; Alhusainan KS; Algasomy SF; Althowainy IR
    Saudi Med J; 2014 Sep; 35(9):999-1004. PubMed ID: 25228183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Utilization of an Electronic Triage System by Emergency Department Nurses.
    Alumran A; Alkhaldi O; Aldroorah Z; Alsayegh Z; Alsafwani F; Almaghraby N
    J Multidiscip Healthc; 2020; 13():339-344. PubMed ID: 32280235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Predictors of Low-Acuity Emergency Department Use by Patients Enrolled in a Family Health Team.
    Jones P; Jones J; O'Brien K; Lee-Poy M
    CJEM; 2015 Jul; 17(4):359-66. PubMed ID: 26134052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reliability and validity of triage systems in paediatric emergency care.
    van Veen M; Moll HA
    Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2009 Aug; 17():38. PubMed ID: 19712467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Influence of electronic triage decision-support on hospital admission, left without being seen and time to physician initial assessment in the emergency department.
    McLeod SL; Grewal K; Thompson C; Thabane L; Borgundvaag B; Ovens H; Scott S; Ahmed T; Mittmann N; Worster A; Agoritsas T; Guyatt G
    CJEM; 2021 Mar; 23(2):214-218. PubMed ID: 33709360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A pilot study examining the speed and accuracy of triage for simulated disaster patients in an emergency department setting: Comparison of a computerized version of Canadian Triage Acuity Scale (CTAS) and Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment (START) methods.
    Curran-Sills G; Franc JM
    CJEM; 2017 Sep; 19(5):364-371. PubMed ID: 27788698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Implementation of the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) in an Urgent Care Center in Saudi Arabia.
    Arafat A; Al-Farhan A; Abu Khalil H
    Int J Emerg Med; 2016 Dec; 9(1):17. PubMed ID: 27286892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comment on Alquraini et al.: reliability of Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) in Saudi Arabia.
    Mirhaghi A
    Int J Emerg Med; 2015 Dec; 8(1):40. PubMed ID: 26559200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Impact of Pain Assessment on Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale Prediction of Patient Outcomes.
    Davis S; Ju C; Marchandise P; Diagne M; Grant L
    Ann Emerg Med; 2022 May; 79(5):433-440. PubMed ID: 35184870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Inter-observer agreement using the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale.
    Manos D; Petrie DA; Beveridge RC; Walter S; Ducharme J
    CJEM; 2002 Jan; 4(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 17637144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Interrater Reliability, Accuracy, and Triage Time Pre- and Post-implementation of a Real-Time Electronic Triage Decision-Support Tool.
    McLeod SL; McCarron J; Ahmed T; Grewal K; Mittmann N; Scott S; Ovens H; Garay J; Bullard M; Rowe BH; Dreyer J; Borgundvaag B
    Ann Emerg Med; 2020 Apr; 75(4):524-531. PubMed ID: 31564379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of the Emergency Severity Index (version 3) triage algorithm in pediatric patients.
    Baumann MR; Strout TD
    Acad Emerg Med; 2005 Mar; 12(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 15741584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Utilizing the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) in an oncology urgent care clinic: the university health network experience.
    Trip K; Boloorchi A; Berman H
    Can Oncol Nurs J; 2011; 21(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 21462878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A determination of emergency department pre-triage times in patients not arriving by ambulance compared to widely used guideline recommendations.
    Betz M; Stempien J; Trivedi S; Bryce R
    CJEM; 2017 Jul; 19(4):265-270. PubMed ID: 27917744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Inter-rater reliability of a computerized presenting-complaint-linked triage system in an urban emergency department.
    Grafstein E; Innes G; Westman J; Christenson J; Thorne A
    CJEM; 2003 Sep; 5(5):323-9. PubMed ID: 17466140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.