These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26258175)

  • 1. Interfacial Adaptation of Composite Restorations Before and After Light Curing: Effects of Adhesive and Filling Technique.
    Yoshimine N; Shimada Y; Tagami J; Sadr A
    J Adhes Dent; 2015 Aug; 17(4):329-36. PubMed ID: 26258175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Concurrent evaluation of composite internal adaptation and bond strength in a class-I cavity.
    Bakhsh TA; Sadr A; Shimada Y; Mandurah MM; Hariri I; Alsayed EZ; Tagami J; Sumi Y
    J Dent; 2013 Jan; 41(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 23044389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selective enamel etching: effect on marginal adaptation of self-etch LED-cured bond systems in aged Class I composite restorations.
    Souza-Junior EJ; Prieto LT; Araújo CT; Paulillo LA
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 22313271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Real-Time Imaging of Gap Progress during and after Composite Polymerization.
    Hayashi J; Shimada Y; Tagami J; Sumi Y; Sadr A
    J Dent Res; 2017 Aug; 96(9):992-998. PubMed ID: 28521113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of the curing method and composite volume on marginal and internal adaptation of composite restoratives.
    Souza-Junior EJ; de Souza-Régis MR; Alonso RC; de Freitas AP; Sinhoreti MA; Cunha LG
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 21702671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. SEM evaluation of marginal sealing on composite restorations using different photoactivation and composite insertion methods.
    Lopes MB; Costa LA; Consani S; Gonini AJ; Sinhoreti MA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(4):394-9. PubMed ID: 20139558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Effect of Thermocycling on Interfacial Bonding Stability of Self-Etch Adhesives: OCT Study.
    Bakhsh TA; Turkistani A
    Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():5578539. PubMed ID: 34212034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of curing unit and adhesive system on marginal adaptation of composite restorations.
    Casselli DS; Faria-e-Silva AL; Casselli H; Martins LR
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(6):e408-12. PubMed ID: 23220321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Marginal Quality of Class II Composite Restorations Placed in Bulk Compared to an Incremental Technique: Evaluation with SEM and Stereomicroscope.
    Heintze SD; Monreal D; Peschke A
    J Adhes Dent; 2015 Apr; 17(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 25893223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Environmental SEM and dye penetration observation on resin-tooth interface using different light curing method.
    Yoshikawa T; Morigami M; Sadr A; Tagami J
    Dent Mater J; 2016; 35(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 26830828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Non-invasive quantification of resin-dentin interfacial gaps using optical coherence tomography: validation against confocal microscopy.
    Bakhsh TA; Sadr A; Shimada Y; Tagami J; Sumi Y
    Dent Mater; 2011 Sep; 27(9):915-25. PubMed ID: 21665263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marginal analysis of resin composite restorative systems using optical coherence tomography.
    Monteiro GQ; Montes MA; Gomes AS; Mota CC; Campello SL; Freitas AZ
    Dent Mater; 2011 Dec; 27(12):e213-23. PubMed ID: 21925721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 3D assessment of void and gap formation in flowable resin composites using optical coherence tomography.
    Nazari A; Sadr A; Shimada Y; Tagami J; Sumi Y
    J Adhes Dent; 2013 Jun; 15(3):237-43. PubMed ID: 23534012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optical Evaluation of Enamel Microleakage with One-Step Self-Etch Adhesives.
    Turkistani A; Almutairi M; Banakhar N; Rubehan R; Mugharbil S; Jamleh A; Nasir A; Bakhsh T
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2018 Nov; 36(11):589-594. PubMed ID: 29813001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cuspal movement related to different polymerization protocols.
    Piccioni MA; Baratto-Filho F; Kuga MC; Morais EC; Campos EA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Jan; 15(1):26-8. PubMed ID: 24939260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of filling technique and curing mode on the bond strengths of composite cores to pulpal floor dentin.
    Ariyoshi M; Nikaido T; Foxton RM; Tagami J
    Dent Mater J; 2010 Oct; 29(5):562-9. PubMed ID: 20733260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
    Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of flowable composite lining thickness with various curing techniques on microleakage in class II composite restorations: an in vitro study.
    Reddy SN; Jayashankar DN; Nainan M; Shivanna V
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jan; 14(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 23579894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of curing time, overlay material and thickness on three light-curing composites used for luting indirect composite restorations.
    D'Arcangelo C; De Angelis F; Vadini M; Carluccio F; Vitalone LM; D'Amario M
    J Adhes Dent; 2012 Aug; 14(4):377-84. PubMed ID: 22282760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.