These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26258175)

  • 21. The use of a liner under different bulk-fill resin composites: 3D GAP formation analysis by x-ray microcomputed tomography.
    Oglakci B; Kazak M; Donmez N; Dalkilic EE; Koymen SS
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2020; 28():e20190042. PubMed ID: 31778443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effects of cavity size and filling method on the bonding to Class I cavities.
    He Z; Shimada Y; Sadr A; Ikeda M; Tagami J
    J Adhes Dent; 2008 Dec; 10(6):447-53. PubMed ID: 19189675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of waiting interval on chemical activation mode of dual-cure one-step self-etching adhesives on bonding to root canal dentin.
    Thitthaweerat S; Nakajima M; Foxton RM; Tagami J
    J Dent; 2012 Dec; 40(12):1109-18. PubMed ID: 23000471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Microleakage and shear punch bond strength in class II primary molars cavities restored with low shrink silorane based versus methacrylate based composite using three different techniques.
    Fahmy AE; Farrag NM
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 35(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 21417120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Marginal adaptation of Class V restorations using different restorative techniques.
    Krejci I; Lutz F
    J Dent; 1991 Feb; 19(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 1901872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Monomer conversion, microhardness, internal marginal adaptation, and shrinkage stress of bulk-fill resin composites.
    Fronza BM; Rueggeberg FA; Braga RR; Mogilevych B; Soares LE; Martin AA; Ambrosano G; Giannini M
    Dent Mater; 2015 Dec; 31(12):1542-51. PubMed ID: 26608118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of bulk/incremental fill on internal gap formation of bulk-fill composites.
    Furness A; Tadros MY; Looney SW; Rueggeberg FA
    J Dent; 2014 Apr; 42(4):439-49. PubMed ID: 24480086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessment of enamel cracks at adhesive cavosurface margin using three-dimensional swept-source optical coherence tomography.
    Tabata T; Shimada Y; Sadr A; Tagami J; Sumi Y
    J Dent; 2017 Jun; 61():28-32. PubMed ID: 28433536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Three-year clinical evaluation of two flowable composites.
    Gallo JR; Burgess JO; Ripps AH; Walker RS; Maltezos MB; Mercante DE; Davidson JM
    Quintessence Int; 2010 Jun; 41(6):497-503. PubMed ID: 20490392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessment of laminate technique using glass ionomer and resin composite for restoration of root filled teeth.
    Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
    J Dent; 2012 Aug; 40(8):617-23. PubMed ID: 22521705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cuspal deflection and depth of cure in resin-based composite restorations filled by using bulk, incremental and transtooth-illumination techniques.
    Campodonico CE; Tantbirojn D; Olin PS; Versluis A
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2011 Oct; 142(10):1176-82. PubMed ID: 21965491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A light curing method for improving marginal sealing and cavity wall adaptation of resin composite restorations.
    Yoshikawa T; Burrow MF; Tagami J
    Dent Mater; 2001 Jul; 17(4):359-66. PubMed ID: 11356214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effects of filling techniques and a low-viscosity composite liner on bond strength to class II cavities.
    Figueiredo Reis A; Giannini M; Ambrosano GM; Chan DC
    J Dent; 2003 Jan; 31(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 12615021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of curing mode and moisture on nanoindentation mechanical properties and bonding of a self-adhesive resin cement to pulp chamber floor.
    Moosavi H; Hariri I; Sadr A; Thitthaweerat S; Tagami J
    Dent Mater; 2013 Jun; 29(6):708-17. PubMed ID: 23608759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Directed polymerization shrinkage versus a horizontal incremental filling technique: interfacial adaptation in vivo in Class II cavities.
    van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P; Waern R
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):165-72. PubMed ID: 10388370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Role of delayed light polymerization of a dual-cured composite base on marginal adaptation of class II posterior composite open-sandwich restoration.
    Kamath U; Sheth H;
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):296. PubMed ID: 22945734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of Restorative System and Thermal Cycling on the Tooth-Restoration Interface - OCT Evaluation.
    Sampaio CS; Rodrigues RV; Souza-Junior EJ; Freitas AZ; Ambrosano GM; Pascon FM; Puppin-Rontani RM
    Oper Dent; 2016; 41(2):162-70. PubMed ID: 26266651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Acoustic emission analysis of tooth-composite interfacial debonding.
    Cho NY; Ferracane JL; Lee IB
    J Dent Res; 2013 Jan; 92(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 23100273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Spatially resolved assessments of composite shrinkage in MOD restorations using a digital-image-correlation technique.
    Chuang SF; Chang CH; Chen TY
    Dent Mater; 2011 Feb; 27(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 20951420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of pre-heated composites and flowable liners on Class II gingival margin gap formation.
    Sabatini C; Blunck U; Denehy G; Munoz C
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):663-71. PubMed ID: 21180006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.