These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26258276)

  • 1. Comparing Autorefractors for Measurement of Accommodation.
    Aldaba M; Gómez-López S; Vilaseca M; Pujol J; Arjona M
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Oct; 92(10):1003-11. PubMed ID: 26258276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experimental investigation of accommodation in eyes fit with multifocal contact lenses using a clinical auto-refractor.
    Altoaimi BH; Kollbaum P; Meyer D; Bradley A
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 Mar; 38(2):152-163. PubMed ID: 29315718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of the PowerRef 3 for Measuring Accommodation: Comparison With the Grand Seiko WAM-5500A Autorefractor.
    Gehring AM; Haensel JX; Curtiss MK; Roberts TL
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2022 Oct; 11(10):25. PubMed ID: 36255360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Objective accommodative amplitude and dynamics with the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens.
    Wolffsohn JS; Hunt OA; Naroo S; Gilmartin B; Shah S; Cunliffe IA; Benson MT; Mantry S
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Mar; 47(3):1230-5. PubMed ID: 16505063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Static and dynamic accommodation measured using the WAM-5500 Autorefractor.
    Win-Hall DM; Houser J; Glasser A
    Optom Vis Sci; 2010 Nov; 87(11):873-82. PubMed ID: 20852450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurement of refractive error and accommodation with the photorefractor PowerRef II.
    Jainta S; Jaschinski W; Hoormann J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Nov; 24(6):520-7. PubMed ID: 15491480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of aberrometry-based relative peripheral refraction measurements.
    Berntsen DA; Mutti DO; Zadnik K
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jan; 28(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 18201339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [One-year longitudinal change in parameters of myopic school children trained by a new accommodative training device--uncorrected visual acuity, refraction, axial length, accommodation, and pupil reaction].
    Watanabe K; Hara N; Kimijima M; Kotegawa Y; Ohno K; Arimoto A; Mukuno K; Hisahara S; Horie H
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2012 Oct; 116(10):929-36. PubMed ID: 23285840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accommodative fluctuations, lens tension, and ciliary body thickness in children.
    Schultz KE; Sinnott LT; Mutti DO; Bailey MD
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Jun; 86(6):677-84. PubMed ID: 19417700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Systematic measurement errors involved in over-refraction using an autorefractor (Grand-Seiko WV-500): is measurement of accommodative lag through spectacle lenses valid?
    Kimura S; Hasebe S; Ohtsuki H
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 May; 27(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 17470241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Study on accommodation by autorefraction and dynamic refraction in children.
    Krishnacharya PS
    J Optom; 2014; 7(4):193-202. PubMed ID: 25130066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changes in accommodative responses with multifocal contact lenses: a pilot study.
    Madrid-Costa D; Ruiz-Alcocer J; Radhakrishnan H; Ferrer-Blasco T; Montés-Micó R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Nov; 88(11):1309-16. PubMed ID: 21926653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The short-term accommodation response to aniso-accommodative stimuli in isometropia.
    Vincent SJ; Collins MJ; Read SA; Ghosh A; Chen C; Lam A; Sahota S; Vo R
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 Sep; 35(5):552-61. PubMed ID: 26094940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differences in the Stimulus Accommodative Convergence/Accommodation Ratio using Various Techniques and Accommodative Stimuli.
    Satou T; Ito M; Shinomiya Y; Takahashi Y; Hara N; Niida T
    Strabismus; 2018 Jun; 26(2):53-61. PubMed ID: 29617209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of fogging lenses and cycloplegia on open-field automatic refraction.
    Queirós A; González-Méijome J; Jorge J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jul; 28(4):387-92. PubMed ID: 18565095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Suitability of open-field autorefractors as pupillometers and instrument design effects.
    Otero C; Aldaba M; Ferrer O; Gascón A; Ondategui-Parra JC; Pujol J
    Int J Ophthalmol; 2017; 10(4):567-572. PubMed ID: 28503429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accommodation stimulus-response function and retinal image quality.
    Buehren T; Collins MJ
    Vision Res; 2006 May; 46(10):1633-45. PubMed ID: 16040078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dynamics of accommodative facility in myopes.
    Radhakrishnan H; Allen PM; Charman WN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Sep; 48(9):4375-82. PubMed ID: 17724230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Theoretical and measured pseudophakic accommodation after implantation of a new accommodative posterior chamber intraocular lens.
    Langenbucher A; Seitz B; Huber S; Nguyen NX; Kuchle M
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2003 Dec; 121(12):1722-7. PubMed ID: 14662592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Static and dynamic measurements of accommodation in individuals with down syndrome.
    Anderson HA; Manny RE; Glasser A; Stuebing KK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Jan; 52(1):310-7. PubMed ID: 20739471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.