These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26258575)

  • 1. Fast, Continuous Audiogram Estimation Using Machine Learning.
    Song XD; Wallace BM; Gardner JR; Ledbetter NM; Weinberger KQ; Barbour DL
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):e326-35. PubMed ID: 26258575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Online Machine Learning Audiometry.
    Barbour DL; Howard RT; Song XD; Metzger N; Sukesan KA; DiLorenzo JC; Snyder BRD; Chen JY; Degen EA; Buchbinder JM; Heisey KL
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):918-926. PubMed ID: 30358656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamically Masked Audiograms With Machine Learning Audiometry.
    Heisey KL; Walker AM; Xie K; Abrams JM; Barbour DL
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(6):1692-1702. PubMed ID: 33136643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The relation between the pure-tone audiogram and the click auditory brainstem response threshold in cochlear hearing loss.
    van der Drift JF; Brocaar MP; van Zanten GA
    Audiology; 1987; 26(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 3593096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of Mobile-Based Audiometry in the Evaluation of Hearing Loss in Quiet and Noisy Environments.
    Saliba J; Al-Reefi M; Carriere JS; Verma N; Provencal C; Rappaport JM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Apr; 156(4):706-711. PubMed ID: 28025906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identification of conductive hearing loss using air conduction tests alone: reliability and validity of an automatic test battery.
    Convery E; Keidser G; Seeto M; Freeston K; Zhou D; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 24080948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correlations between audiogram and objective hearing tests in sensorineural hearing loss.
    Bishara L; Ben-David J; Podoshin L; Fradis M; Teszler CB; Pratt H; Shpack T; Feiglin H; Hafner H; Herlinger N
    Int Tinnitus J; 1999; 5(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 10753428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Audiogram estimation using Bayesian active learning.
    Schlittenlacher J; Turner RE; Moore BCJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jul; 144(1):421. PubMed ID: 30075695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring Temporal Resolution (Release of Masking) with a Hughson-Westlake Up-Down Instead of a Békèsy-Tracking Procedure.
    Rhebergen KS; van Esch TE; Dreschler WA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jun; 26(6):563-71. PubMed ID: 26134723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fixed-Level Frequency Threshold Testing for Ototoxicity Monitoring.
    Rieke CC; Clavier OH; Allen LV; Anderson AP; Brooks CA; Fellows AM; Brungart DS; Buckey JC
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):e369-e375. PubMed ID: 28362673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High-frequency pure-tone audiometry in children: a test-retest reliability study relative to ototoxic criteria.
    Beahan N; Kei J; Driscoll C; Charles B; Khan A
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 21760512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer-assisted audiometry versus manual audiometry.
    Ho AT; Hildreth AJ; Lindsey L
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):876-83. PubMed ID: 20179426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Continuous versus pulsed pure-tone audiometry in a group of school-aged children.
    van Dijk C; Osman N
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 2008; 55():29-36. PubMed ID: 19485067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting the degree of hearing loss using click auditory brainstem response in babies referred from newborn hearing screening.
    Baldwin M; Watkin P
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):361-9. PubMed ID: 23340456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of a portable hearing assessment tool: Agilis Health Mobile Audiogram.
    Manganella JL; Stiles DJ; Kawai K; Barrett DL; O'Brien LB; Kenna MA
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Oct; 113():94-98. PubMed ID: 30174018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Brainstem electric response audiometry: estimation of the amount of conductive hearing loss with and without use of the response threshold.
    van der Drift JF; van Zanten GA; Brocaar MP
    Audiology; 1989; 28(4):181-93. PubMed ID: 2751487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical validation of the AMTAS automated audiometer.
    Eikelboom RH; Swanepoel de W; Motakef S; Upson GS
    Int J Audiol; 2013 May; 52(5):342-9. PubMed ID: 23548148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perspectives on the Pure-Tone Audiogram.
    Musiek FE; Shinn J; Chermak GD; Bamiou DE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017; 28(7):655-671. PubMed ID: 28722648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The estimation of behavioral audiograms, auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds and auditory steady-state response (ASSR) thresholds of young adults with normal hearing].
    Szymańska A; Gryczyński M; Pajor A
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2008; 62(6):735-9. PubMed ID: 19205522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Emerging Future of Mobile Audiometry: A Prospective Validation Study of the Mimi Hearing Test Application.
    Moazzami C; Gagnon C; Bertrand L; Saliba I; Saliba J
    Otol Neurotol; 2024 Aug; 45(7):740-744. PubMed ID: 38942612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.