These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26258990)

  • 1. A Test of the DSP Sexing Method on CT Images from a Modern French Sample.
    Mestekova S; Bruzek J; Veleminska J; Chaumoitre K
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Sep; 60(5):1295-9. PubMed ID: 26258990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sex determination using the Probabilistic Sex Diagnosis (DSP: Diagnose Sexuelle Probabiliste) tool in a virtual environment.
    Chapman T; Lefevre P; Semal P; Moiseev F; Sholukha V; Louryan S; Rooze M; Van Sint Jan S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Jan; 234():189.e1-8. PubMed ID: 24290894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Virtual determination of sex: metric and nonmetric traits of the adult pelvis from 3D computed tomography models.
    Decker SJ; Davy-Jow SL; Ford JM; Hilbelink DR
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Sep; 56(5):1107-14. PubMed ID: 21595690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation and reliability of the sex estimation of the human os coxae using freely available DSP2 software for bioarchaeology and forensic anthropology.
    Brůžek J; Santos F; Dutailly B; Murail P; Cunha E
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2017 Oct; 164(2):440-449. PubMed ID: 28714560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Morphometric sexual dimorphism of human sternum in a north Indian autopsy sample: sexing efficacy of different statistical techniques and a comparison with other sexing methods.
    Singh J; Pathak RK
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 May; 228(1-3):174.e1-10. PubMed ID: 23562145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Morphometric sex estimation from 3D computed tomography os coxae model and its validation in skeletal remains.
    Djorojevic M; Roldán C; García-Parra P; Alemán I; Botella M
    Int J Legal Med; 2014 Sep; 128(5):879-88. PubMed ID: 24928326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sex determination of the pelvis using Fourier analysis of postmortem CT images.
    Hayashizaki Y; Usui A; Hosokai Y; Sakai J; Funayama M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Jan; 246():122.e1-9. PubMed ID: 25459269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Morphometric analysis of sex differences in contemporary Japanese pelves using multidetector computed tomography.
    Torimitsu S; Makino Y; Saitoh H; Sakuma A; Ishii N; Yajima D; Inokuchi G; Motomura A; Chiba F; Yamaguchi R; Hashimoto M; Hoshioka Y; Iwase H
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Dec; 257():530.e1-530.e7. PubMed ID: 26553274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A method of sexing the human os coxae based on logistic regressions and Bruzek's nonmetric traits.
    Santos F; Guyomarc'h P; Rmoutilova R; Bruzek J
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2019 Jul; 169(3):435-447. PubMed ID: 31093965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The prospects for application of computational anatomy in forensic anthropology for sex determination.
    Franchi A; Valette S; Agier R; Prost R; Kéchichan R; Fanton L
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Apr; 297():156-160. PubMed ID: 30798101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Geometric morphometric approach to sex estimation of human pelvis.
    Gonzalez PN; Bernal V; Perez SI
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Aug; 189(1-3):68-74. PubMed ID: 19442464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Metric Sex Determination of the Human Coxal Bone on a Virtual Sample using Decision Trees.
    Savall F; Faruch-Bilfeld M; Dedouit F; Sans N; Rousseau H; Rougé D; Telmon N
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Nov; 60(6):1395-400. PubMed ID: 26259073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What is the appropriate approach in sex determination of hyoid bones?
    Urbanová P; Hejna P; Zátopková L; Šafr M
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2013 Nov; 20(8):996-1003. PubMed ID: 24237807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy and Reliability of the Klales et al. (2012) Morphoscopic Pelvic Sexing Method.
    Lesciotto KM; Doershuk LJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jan; 63(1):214-220. PubMed ID: 28382657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiographic examination of the greater sciatic notch in determining the sex among Iranian people.
    Alizadeh Z; Hosseini A; Abkenari ShA; Jabbari M
    Med Sci Law; 2013 Apr; 53(2):85-9. PubMed ID: 23160604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Metric characterization of the human coxal bone on a recent Italian sample and multivariate discriminant analysis to determine sex.
    Vacca E; Di Vella G
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Oct; 222(1-3):401.e1-9. PubMed ID: 22770620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Virtual forensic anthropology: The accuracy of osteometric analysis of 3D bone models derived from clinical computed tomography (CT) scans.
    Colman KL; de Boer HH; Dobbe JGG; Liberton NPTJ; Stull KE; van Eijnatten M; Streekstra GJ; Oostra RJ; van Rijn RR; van der Merwe AE
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Nov; 304():109963. PubMed ID: 31610335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sexing of human hip bones of Indian origin by discriminant function analysis.
    Dixit SG; Kakar S; Agarwal S; Choudhry R
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2007 Oct; 14(7):429-35. PubMed ID: 17720595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How low can we go? A skeletal maturity threshold for probabilistic visual sex estimation from immature human os coxae.
    Corron LK; Santos F; Adalian P; Chaumoitre K; Guyomarc'h P; Marchal F; Brůžek J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Aug; 325():110854. PubMed ID: 34091409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new computer-tomography-based method of sex estimation: Development of Turkish population-specific standards.
    Gulhan O; Harrison K; Kiris A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Oct; 255():2-8. PubMed ID: 26250530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.