230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26259073)
1. Metric Sex Determination of the Human Coxal Bone on a Virtual Sample using Decision Trees.
Savall F; Faruch-Bilfeld M; Dedouit F; Sans N; Rousseau H; Rougé D; Telmon N
J Forensic Sci; 2015 Nov; 60(6):1395-400. PubMed ID: 26259073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Metric characterization of the human coxal bone on a recent Italian sample and multivariate discriminant analysis to determine sex.
Vacca E; Di Vella G
Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Oct; 222(1-3):401.e1-9. PubMed ID: 22770620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Human coxal bone sexual dimorphism and multislice computed tomography: geometric morphometric analysis of 65 adults.
Bilfeld MF; Dedouit F; Rousseau H; Sans N; Braga J; Rougé D; Telmon N
J Forensic Sci; 2012 May; 57(3):578-88. PubMed ID: 22211944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Virtual determination of sex: metric and nonmetric traits of the adult pelvis from 3D computed tomography models.
Decker SJ; Davy-Jow SL; Ford JM; Hilbelink DR
J Forensic Sci; 2011 Sep; 56(5):1107-14. PubMed ID: 21595690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Validation Study of the Langley et al. (2017) Decision Tree Model for Sex Estimation.
Garvin HM; Klales AR
J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jul; 63(4):1243-1251. PubMed ID: 29148064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Test of the DSP Sexing Method on CT Images from a Modern French Sample.
Mestekova S; Bruzek J; Veleminska J; Chaumoitre K
J Forensic Sci; 2015 Sep; 60(5):1295-9. PubMed ID: 26258990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A new computer-tomography-based method of sex estimation: Development of Turkish population-specific standards.
Gulhan O; Harrison K; Kiris A
Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Oct; 255():2-8. PubMed ID: 26250530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sex determination using the Probabilistic Sex Diagnosis (DSP: Diagnose Sexuelle Probabiliste) tool in a virtual environment.
Chapman T; Lefevre P; Semal P; Moiseev F; Sholukha V; Louryan S; Rooze M; Van Sint Jan S
Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Jan; 234():189.e1-8. PubMed ID: 24290894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Discriminant function analysis for sex assessment in pelvic girdle bones: sample from the contemporary Mexican population.
Gómez-Valdés JA; Torres Ramírez G; Báez Molgado S; Herrera Sain-Leu P; Castrejón Caballero JL; Sánchez-Mejorada G
J Forensic Sci; 2011 Mar; 56(2):297-301. PubMed ID: 21265837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Testing landmark redundancy for sex-based shape analysis of the adult human os coxa.
Robertson HI; Pokotylo DL; Weston DA
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2019 Aug; 169(4):689-703. PubMed ID: 31155703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The prospects for application of computational anatomy in forensic anthropology for sex determination.
Franchi A; Valette S; Agier R; Prost R; Kéchichan R; Fanton L
Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Apr; 297():156-160. PubMed ID: 30798101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Decision Tree for Nonmetric Sex Assessment from the Skull.
Langley NR; Dudzik B; Cloutier A
J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jan; 63(1):31-37. PubMed ID: 28508544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Morphometric analysis of sex differences in contemporary Japanese pelves using multidetector computed tomography.
Torimitsu S; Makino Y; Saitoh H; Sakuma A; Ishii N; Yajima D; Inokuchi G; Motomura A; Chiba F; Yamaguchi R; Hashimoto M; Hoshioka Y; Iwase H
Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Dec; 257():530.e1-530.e7. PubMed ID: 26553274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Osteometric sex estimation from the os coxa in a Thai population.
Mahakkanukrauh P; Ruengdit S; Tun SM; Case DT; Sinthubua A
Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Feb; 271():127.e1-127.e7. PubMed ID: 28062152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Morphometric sex estimation from 3D computed tomography os coxae model and its validation in skeletal remains.
Djorojevic M; Roldán C; García-Parra P; Alemán I; Botella M
Int J Legal Med; 2014 Sep; 128(5):879-88. PubMed ID: 24928326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Morphometric analysis of pelvic sexual dimorphism in a contemporary Western Australian population.
Franklin D; Cardini A; Flavel A; Marks MK
Int J Legal Med; 2014 Sep; 128(5):861-72. PubMed ID: 24789357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Metric Assessment of the Pubic Bone Using Known and Novel Data Points for Sex Estimation.
Blake KAS; Hartnett-McCann K
J Forensic Sci; 2018 Sep; 63(5):1472-1478. PubMed ID: 29341124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Data mining for sex estimation based on cranial measurements.
Toneva DH; Nikolova SY; Agre GP; Zlatareva DK; Hadjidekov VG; Lazarov NE
Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Oct; 315():110441. PubMed ID: 32781389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ontogeny of Size and Shape Sexual Dimorphism in the Pubis: A Multislice Computed Tomography Study by Geometric Morphometry.
Bilfeld MF; Dedouit F; Sans N; Rousseau H; Rougé D; Telmon N
J Forensic Sci; 2015 Sep; 60(5):1121-8. PubMed ID: 25782723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Specific-age group sex estimation of infants through geometric morphometrics analysis of pubis and ischium.
Estévez Campo EJ; López-Lázaro S; López-Morago Rodríguez C; Alemán Aguilera I; Botella López MC
Forensic Sci Int; 2018 May; 286():185-192. PubMed ID: 29587219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
