244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26259638)
1. A prospective study of the use of the Myosure resectoscope to manage endometrial polyps in an outpatient setting.
McIlwaine P; McElhinney B; Karthigasu KA; Hart R
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Oct; 55(5):482-6. PubMed ID: 26259638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. New mini-resectoscope: analysis of preliminary quality results in outpatient hysteroscopic polypectomy.
Dealberti D; Riboni F; Prigione S; Pisani C; Rovetta E; Montella F; Garuti G
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Aug; 288(2):349-53. PubMed ID: 23417150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hysteroscopic tissue removal system (MyoSure) for the resection of polyps, sub-mucosal leiomyomas and retained products of conception in an out-patient setting: A single UK institution experience.
Georgiou D; Tranoulis A; Jackson TL
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Dec; 231():147-151. PubMed ID: 30388609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outpatient hysteroscopic polypectomy in postmenopausal women: a comparison between mechanical and electrosurgical resection.
Garuti G; Centinaio G; Luerti M
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):595-600. PubMed ID: 18722972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outpatient operative polypectomy using a 5 mm-hysteroscope without anaesthesia and/or analgesia: advantages and limits.
Litta P; Cosmi E; Saccardi C; Esposito C; Rui R; Ambrosini G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Aug; 139(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 18248873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A randomised controlled trial comparing outpatient versus daycase endometrial polypectomy.
Marsh FA; Rogerson LJ; Duffy SR
BJOG; 2006 Aug; 113(8):896-901. PubMed ID: 16753049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. When is see-and-treat hysteroscopic polypectomy successful?
Gambadauro P; Martínez-Maestre MA; Torrejón R
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Jul; 178():70-3. PubMed ID: 24792666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Resectoscope versus small diameter hysteroscopy for endometrial polypectomy in patients with "unfavorable" cervix.
DE Franciscis P; Grauso F; Messalli EM; Schettino MT; Calagna G; Perino A; Colacurci N; Torella M
Minerva Ginecol; 2017 Jun; 69(3):239-244. PubMed ID: 27834479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Feasibility and Acceptability of Office-Based Polypectomy With a 16F Mini-Resectoscope: A Multicenter Clinical Study.
Dealberti D; Riboni F; Cosma S; Pisani C; Montella F; Saitta S; Calagna G; Di Spiezio Sardo A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(3):418-24. PubMed ID: 26767826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. AlphaScope vs lens-based hysteroscope for office polypectomy without anesthesia: randomized controlled study.
Cicinelli E; Tinelli R; Loiudice L; Loiudice I; Quattromini P; Fusco A; Cicinelli MV; Pinto V
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(6):796-9. PubMed ID: 22024266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outpatient Hysteroscopic Polypectomy: Bipolar Energy System (Versapoint®) versus Mechanical Energy System (TRUCLEAR System®) - Preliminary Results.
Rovira Pampalona J; Degollada Bastos M; Mancebo Moreno G; Ratia Garcia E; Buron Pust A; Mateu Pruñonosa JC; Guerra Garcia A; Carreras Collado R; Bresco Torras P
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2015; 80(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 25824810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hysteroscopic Tissue Removal Systems: A Randomized In Vitro Comparison.
Meulenbroeks D; Hamerlynck TW; Saglam-Kara S; Van Rijssel NK; Van Vliet HA; Schoot BC
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):159-164. PubMed ID: 27597661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outpatient hysteroscopic polypectomy in 237 patients: feasibility of a one-stop "see-and-treat" procedure.
Garuti G; Cellani F; Colonnelli M; Grossi F; Luerti M
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 2004 Nov; 11(4):500-4. PubMed ID: 15701193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hysteroscopic polypectomy: a comparison between 22 Fr and 26 Fr resectoscopes under paracervical block anesthesia, a randomized controlled study.
Remondi C; Sesti F; Sorrenti G; Venezia G; Sorge R; Pietropolli A; Silvi B; Piccione E
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2018 Dec; 27(6):339-346. PubMed ID: 29543077
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Hysteroscopic morcellation versus bipolar resection for endometrial polyp removal].
Hamidouche A; Vincienne M; Thubert T; Trichot C; Demoulin G; Rivain AL; Deffieux X
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2015 Feb; 43(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 25595942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Feasibility of resectoscopic operative hysteroscopy in a UK outpatient clinic using local anesthetic and traditional reusable equipment, with patient experiences and comparative cost analysis.
Penketh RJ; Bruen EM; White J; Griffiths AN; Patwardhan A; Lindsay P; Hill S; Carolan-Rees G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(5):830-6. PubMed ID: 24681168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Operative hysteroscopy in an office-based surgical setting: review of patient safety and satisfaction in 414 cases.
Wortman M; Daggett A; Ball C
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 23107759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effectiveness of transcervical hysteroscopic endometrial resection based on the prevention of the recurrence of endometrial polyps in post-menopausal women.
Jiménez-Lopez JS; Miguel AG; Tejerizo-Garcia A; Muñoz-Gonzalez JL; Lopez-Gonzalez G
BMC Womens Health; 2015; 15():20. PubMed ID: 25783652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of hysteroscopic mechanical tissue removal with bipolar electrical resection for the management of endometrial polyps in an ambulatory care setting: preliminary results.
Pampalona JR; Bastos MD; Moreno GM; Pust AB; Montesdeoca GE; Guerra Garcia A; Pruñonosa JC; Collado RC; Torras PB
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(3):439-45. PubMed ID: 25497165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Endometrial preparation with estradiol plus dienogest (Qlaira) for office hysteroscopic polypectomy: randomized pilot study.
Cicinelli E; Pinto V; Quattromini P; Fucci MR; Lepera A; Mitola PC; Cicinelli MV; Annarita F; Tinelli R
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2012; 19(3):356-9. PubMed ID: 22322156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
