These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26259665)
1. Close surgical margins after radical prostatectomy mimic biochemical recurrence rates of positive margins. Whalen MJ; Shapiro EY; Rothberg MB; Turk AT; Woldu SL; Roy Choudhury A; Patel T; Badani KK Urol Oncol; 2015 Nov; 33(11):494.e9-494.e14. PubMed ID: 26259665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Short (≤ 1 mm) positive surgical margin and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Shikanov S; Marchetti P; Desai V; Razmaria A; Antic T; Al-Ahmadie H; Zagaja G; Eggener S; Brendler C; Shalhav A BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 22759270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Positive margin length and highest Gleason grade of tumor at the margin predict for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer. Chapin BF; Nguyen JN; Achim MF; Navai N; Williams SB; Prokhorova IN; Wang X; Tapia EMLN; Davis JW; Troncoso P Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2018 Jun; 21(2):221-227. PubMed ID: 29230008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of margin status at 37 months after robot assisted radical prostatectomy. Warner JN; Nunez RN; Mmeje CO; Colby TV; Ferrigni RG; Humphreys MR; Andrews PE; Castle EP Can J Urol; 2011 Dec; 18(6):6043-9. PubMed ID: 22166333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radical prostatectomy and the effect of close surgical margins: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database. Herforth C; Stroup SP; Chen Z; Howard LE; Freedland SJ; Moreira DM; Terris MK; Aronson WJ; Cooperberg MR; Amling CL; Kane CJ BJU Int; 2018 Oct; 122(4):592-598. PubMed ID: 29473992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of robot-assisted and open retropubic radical prostatectomy for risk of biochemical progression in men with positive surgical margins. Shapiro EY; Scarberry K; Patel T; Bergman A; Ahn JJ; Sahi N; RoyChoudhury A; Deutch I; McKiernan JM; Benson MC; Badani KK J Endourol; 2014 Feb; 28(2):208-13. PubMed ID: 24044423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy. Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients. Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome. De La Roca RL; Da Cunha IW; Bezerra SM; Da Fonseca FP Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 25010296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A close surgical margin after radical prostatectomy is an independent predictor of recurrence. Lu J; Wirth GJ; Wu S; Chen J; Dahl DM; Olumi AF; Young RH; McDougal WS; Wu CL J Urol; 2012 Jul; 188(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 22578729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Positive surgical margin in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: correlation with pathology findings and risk of biochemical recurrence. Jo JK; Hong SK; Byun SS; Zargar H; Autorino R; Lee SE Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2017 Oct; 69(5):493-500. PubMed ID: 28376606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Primary Gleason grade 4 at the positive margin is associated with metastasis and death among patients with Gleason 7 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy. Viers BR; Sukov WR; Gettman MT; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Frank I; Tollefson MK; Thompson RH; Boorjian SA; Karnes RJ Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1116-24. PubMed ID: 25052213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk factors for biochemical recurrence following radical perineal prostatectomy in a large contemporary series: a detailed assessment of margin extent and location. Sammon JD; Trinh QD; Sukumar S; Ravi P; Friedman A; Sun M; Schmitges J; Jeldres C; Jeong W; Mander N; Peabody JO; Karakiewicz PI; Harris M Urol Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(8):1470-6. PubMed ID: 22534086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prostate carcinoma with positive margins at radical prostatectomy: role of tumour zonal origin in biochemical recurrence. O'Neil LM; Walsh S; Cohen RJ; Lee S BJU Int; 2015 Oct; 116 Suppl 3():42-8. PubMed ID: 26218868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of solitary and multiple positive surgical margins on hard clinical end points in 1712 adjuvant treatment-naive pT2-4 N0 radical prostatectomy patients. Mauermann J; Fradet V; Lacombe L; Dujardin T; Tiguert R; Tetu B; Fradet Y Eur Urol; 2013 Jul; 64(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 22901983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy among pT2 and pT3a prostate cancer. Oh JJ; Hong SK; Byun SS; Choe G; Lee SE Urol Oncol; 2013 Jul; 31(5):595-600. PubMed ID: 21658977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence. Shikanov S; Song J; Royce C; Al-Ahmadie H; Zorn K; Steinberg G; Zagaja G; Shalhav A; Eggener S J Urol; 2009 Jul; 182(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 19450829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Favorable risk factors in patients with positive surgical margin after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Ha YS; Kang DI; Kim JH; Joung JY; Yu J; Parihar JS; Salmasi AH; Horie S; Kim WJ; Yi Kim I Can J Urol; 2014 Jun; 21(3):7290-7. PubMed ID: 24978359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]