BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26259665)

  • 1. Close surgical margins after radical prostatectomy mimic biochemical recurrence rates of positive margins.
    Whalen MJ; Shapiro EY; Rothberg MB; Turk AT; Woldu SL; Roy Choudhury A; Patel T; Badani KK
    Urol Oncol; 2015 Nov; 33(11):494.e9-494.e14. PubMed ID: 26259665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Short (≤ 1 mm) positive surgical margin and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Shikanov S; Marchetti P; Desai V; Razmaria A; Antic T; Al-Ahmadie H; Zagaja G; Eggener S; Brendler C; Shalhav A
    BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 22759270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Positive margin length and highest Gleason grade of tumor at the margin predict for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
    Chapin BF; Nguyen JN; Achim MF; Navai N; Williams SB; Prokhorova IN; Wang X; Tapia EMLN; Davis JW; Troncoso P
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2018 Jun; 21(2):221-227. PubMed ID: 29230008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of margin status at 37 months after robot assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Warner JN; Nunez RN; Mmeje CO; Colby TV; Ferrigni RG; Humphreys MR; Andrews PE; Castle EP
    Can J Urol; 2011 Dec; 18(6):6043-9. PubMed ID: 22166333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radical prostatectomy and the effect of close surgical margins: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database.
    Herforth C; Stroup SP; Chen Z; Howard LE; Freedland SJ; Moreira DM; Terris MK; Aronson WJ; Cooperberg MR; Amling CL; Kane CJ
    BJU Int; 2018 Oct; 122(4):592-598. PubMed ID: 29473992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of robot-assisted and open retropubic radical prostatectomy for risk of biochemical progression in men with positive surgical margins.
    Shapiro EY; Scarberry K; Patel T; Bergman A; Ahn JJ; Sahi N; RoyChoudhury A; Deutch I; McKiernan JM; Benson MC; Badani KK
    J Endourol; 2014 Feb; 28(2):208-13. PubMed ID: 24044423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
    Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
    BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surgical margin length and location affect recurrence rates after robotic prostatectomy.
    Dev HS; Wiklund P; Patel V; Parashar D; Palmer K; Nyberg T; Skarecky D; Neal DE; Ahlering T; Sooriakumaran P
    Urol Oncol; 2015 Mar; 33(3):109.e7-13. PubMed ID: 25512161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
    Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome.
    De La Roca RL; Da Cunha IW; Bezerra SM; Da Fonseca FP
    Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 25010296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A close surgical margin after radical prostatectomy is an independent predictor of recurrence.
    Lu J; Wirth GJ; Wu S; Chen J; Dahl DM; Olumi AF; Young RH; McDougal WS; Wu CL
    J Urol; 2012 Jul; 188(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 22578729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Positive surgical margin in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: correlation with pathology findings and risk of biochemical recurrence.
    Jo JK; Hong SK; Byun SS; Zargar H; Autorino R; Lee SE
    Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2017 Oct; 69(5):493-500. PubMed ID: 28376606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Primary Gleason grade 4 at the positive margin is associated with metastasis and death among patients with Gleason 7 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.
    Viers BR; Sukov WR; Gettman MT; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Frank I; Tollefson MK; Thompson RH; Boorjian SA; Karnes RJ
    Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1116-24. PubMed ID: 25052213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk factors for biochemical recurrence following radical perineal prostatectomy in a large contemporary series: a detailed assessment of margin extent and location.
    Sammon JD; Trinh QD; Sukumar S; Ravi P; Friedman A; Sun M; Schmitges J; Jeldres C; Jeong W; Mander N; Peabody JO; Karakiewicz PI; Harris M
    Urol Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(8):1470-6. PubMed ID: 22534086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
    J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prostate carcinoma with positive margins at radical prostatectomy: role of tumour zonal origin in biochemical recurrence.
    O'Neil LM; Walsh S; Cohen RJ; Lee S
    BJU Int; 2015 Oct; 116 Suppl 3():42-8. PubMed ID: 26218868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of solitary and multiple positive surgical margins on hard clinical end points in 1712 adjuvant treatment-naive pT2-4 N0 radical prostatectomy patients.
    Mauermann J; Fradet V; Lacombe L; Dujardin T; Tiguert R; Tetu B; Fradet Y
    Eur Urol; 2013 Jul; 64(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 22901983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy among pT2 and pT3a prostate cancer.
    Oh JJ; Hong SK; Byun SS; Choe G; Lee SE
    Urol Oncol; 2013 Jul; 31(5):595-600. PubMed ID: 21658977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence.
    Shikanov S; Song J; Royce C; Al-Ahmadie H; Zorn K; Steinberg G; Zagaja G; Shalhav A; Eggener S
    J Urol; 2009 Jul; 182(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 19450829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Favorable risk factors in patients with positive surgical margin after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Ha YS; Kang DI; Kim JH; Joung JY; Yu J; Parihar JS; Salmasi AH; Horie S; Kim WJ; Yi Kim I
    Can J Urol; 2014 Jun; 21(3):7290-7. PubMed ID: 24978359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.