These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26259747)

  • 1. Spatial interactions between consecutive manual responses.
    Avery B; Cowper-Smith CD; Westwood DA
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Nov; 233(11):3283-90. PubMed ID: 26259747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Between-trial inhibition and facilitation in goal-directed aiming: manual and spatial asymmetries.
    Tremblay L; Welsh TN; Elliott D
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Jan; 160(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 15316705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of directional compatibility on the response latencies of ocular and manual movements.
    Niechwiej-Szwedo E; McIlroy WE; Green R; Verrier MC
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Apr; 162(2):220-9. PubMed ID: 15599726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Processing of visual signals for direct specification of motor targets and for conceptual representation of action targets in the dorsal and ventral premotor cortex.
    Yamagata T; Nakayama Y; Tanji J; Hoshi E
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Dec; 102(6):3280-94. PubMed ID: 19793880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Manual asymmetries in the directional coding of reaching: further evidence for hemispatial effects and right hemisphere dominance for movement planning.
    Barthélémy S; Boulinguez P
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Dec; 147(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 12428138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dissociating affordance and spatial compatibility effects using a pantomimed reaching action.
    Couth S; Gowen E; Poliakoff E
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Mar; 232(3):855-64. PubMed ID: 24337351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reference frame conversions for repeated arm movements.
    Sorrento GU; Henriques DY
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Jun; 99(6):2968-84. PubMed ID: 18400956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When is inhibition of return input- or output-based? It depends on how you look at it.
    Hilchey MD; Dohmen D; Crowder NA; Klein RM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Dec; 70(4):325-334. PubMed ID: 26654387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The processes of facilitation and inhibition in a cue-target paradigm: insight from movement trajectory deviations.
    Neyedli HF; Welsh TN
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Jan; 139(1):159-65. PubMed ID: 22133725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On-line vs. off-line utilization of peripheral visual afferent information to ensure spatial accuracy of goal-directed movements.
    Bédard P; Proteau L
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Sep; 158(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 15029468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Returning to "inhibition of return" by dissociating long-term oculomotor IOR from short-term sensory adaptation and other nonoculomotor "inhibitory" cueing effects.
    Hilchey MD; Klein RM; Satel J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1603-16. PubMed ID: 24820438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distinct mechanisms for planning keypress and reaching responses: a developmental study.
    Adam JJ; Parthoens S; Pratt J
    Hum Mov Sci; 2006 Jun; 25(3):293-309. PubMed ID: 16650495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reaching movements: mode of motor programming influences programming time by itself.
    Favilla M
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Jun; 144(3):414-8. PubMed ID: 12021822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inhibition of return and manual pointing movements.
    Fischer MH; Pratt J; Neggers SF
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Apr; 65(3):379-87. PubMed ID: 12785068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Context influences on the preparation and execution of reaching movements.
    Mirabella G; Pani P; Ferraina S
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2008; 25(7-8):996-1010. PubMed ID: 19378414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fixation offset facilitates saccades and manual reaching for single but not multiple target displays.
    Song JH; Nakayama K
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Feb; 177(2):223-32. PubMed ID: 16947063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The spatial and temporal shape of oculomotor inhibition.
    McSorley E; Haggard P; Walker R
    Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(6):608-14. PubMed ID: 19948108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Grasping remaps the distribution of visuospatial attention and enhances competing action activation.
    Colman H; Remington R; Kritikos A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Sep; 70(9):1892-1908. PubMed ID: 27434754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inhibitory cueing effects following manual and saccadic responses to arrow cues.
    Ding Y; He T; Satel J; Wang Z
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 May; 78(4):1020-9. PubMed ID: 26956560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Covert and overt voluntary attention: linked or independent?
    Hunt AR; Kingstone A
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2003 Dec; 18(1):102-5. PubMed ID: 14659502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.