These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26259862)
1. US psychologists banned from participating in national security interrogations. McCarthy M BMJ; 2015 Aug; 351():h4339. PubMed ID: 26259862 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Psychologists and detainee interrogations: key decisions, opportunities lost, and lessons learned. Pope KS Annu Rev Clin Psychol; 2011; 7():459-81. PubMed ID: 21219192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The ethics of interrogation and the American Psychological Association: a critique of policy and process. Olson B; Soldz S; Davis M Philos Ethics Humanit Med; 2008 Jan; 3():3. PubMed ID: 18230171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Violating ethics: unlawful combatants, national security and health professionals. Holmes D; Perron A J Med Ethics; 2007 Mar; 33(3):143-5. PubMed ID: 17329383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prosecution of US psychologists who ran CIA torture program moves a step closer. Dyer O BMJ; 2016 Apr; 353():i2454. PubMed ID: 27126011 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Contrasting ethical policies of physicians and psychologists concerning interrogation of detainees. Pope KS; Gutheil TG BMJ; 2009 Apr; 338():b1653. PubMed ID: 19406892 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Researching secrecy, state power and prisoner resistance in the Australian high-security prison. Carlton B Melb Hist J; 2001; 29():50-6. PubMed ID: 17821817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. In the immediate wake of Hoffman's independent review: Psychologist and general public perceptions. Thornewill A; DeMatteo D; Heilbrun K Am Psychol; 2020; 75(5):694-707. PubMed ID: 31328927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Introduction: ethics, national security, and global health. Eckenwiler L; Hunt M Med Confl Surviv; 2017 Mar; 33(1):3. PubMed ID: 28521516 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Supreme Court judgment on medical interrogation: on the just use of science and the ethics of doctors' participation in criminal investigation. Jesani A Indian J Med Ethics; 2010; 7(3):139-42. PubMed ID: 20806519 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. American Psychological Association colluded with US officials to bolster CIA torture program, report alleges. McCarthy M BMJ; 2015 May; 350():h2380. PubMed ID: 25944627 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Fostering narratives of peace and security? Kett M; Rushton S Med Confl Surviv; 2017 Mar; 33(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 28609126 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Revenge versus rapport: Interrogation, terrorism, and torture. Alison L; Alison E Am Psychol; 2017 Apr; 72(3):266-277. PubMed ID: 28383979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Failing ethics 101: psychologists, the U.S. military establishment, and human rights. Boyd JW; LoCicero A; Malowney M; Aldis R; Marlin RP Int J Health Serv; 2014; 44(3):615-25. PubMed ID: 25618992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comment on "Psychology and U.S. psychologists in torture and war in the Middle East". Gray G Torture; 2007; 17(1):60. PubMed ID: 17456908 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Post-9/11 torture at CIA "black sites"--physicians and lawyers working together. Annas GJ; Crosby SS N Engl J Med; 2015 Jun; 372(24):2279-81. PubMed ID: 26061833 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]