These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

427 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26259876)

  • 21. Cost-effectiveness of adjuvant icotinib versus chemotherapy for patients with stage II-IIIA EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer in China.
    Mu L; Liu F; Fang Y; He M; Yang M
    BMJ Open; 2024 Aug; 14(8):e081270. PubMed ID: 39179275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cost-effectiveness of Osimertinib in the First-Line Treatment of Patients With EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
    Aguiar PN; Haaland B; Park W; San Tan P; Del Giglio A; de Lima Lopes G
    JAMA Oncol; 2018 Aug; 4(8):1080-1084. PubMed ID: 29852038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cost-Effectiveness of an Individualized First-Line Treatment Strategy Offering Erlotinib Based on EGFR Mutation Testing in Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients in Germany.
    Schremser K; Rogowski WH; Adler-Reichel S; Tufman AL; Huber RM; Stollenwerk B
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2015 Nov; 33(11):1215-28. PubMed ID: 26081300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cost-effectiveness of adding rh-endostatin to first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in China.
    Wu B; Chen H; Shen J; Ye M
    Clin Ther; 2011 Oct; 33(10):1446-55. PubMed ID: 21992806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Economic Analysis of First-Line Treatment with Erlotinib in an EGFR-Mutated Population with Advanced NSCLC.
    Vergnenegre A; Massuti B; de Marinis F; Carcereny E; Felip E; Do P; Sanchez JM; Paz-Arez L; Chouaid C; Rosell R;
    J Thorac Oncol; 2016 Jun; 11(6):801-7. PubMed ID: 26899757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cost effectiveness analysis of afatinib versus pemetrexed-cisplatin for first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic EGFR mutation positive non-small-cell lung cancer from the Singapore healthcare payer's perspective.
    Tan PT; Aziz MIA; Pearce F; Lim WT; Wu DB; Ng K
    BMC Cancer; 2018 Mar; 18(1):352. PubMed ID: 29587666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cost-effectiveness of Atezolizumab Combination Therapy for First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the United States.
    Criss SD; Mooradian MJ; Watson TR; Gainor JF; Reynolds KL; Kong CY
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Sep; 2(9):e1911952. PubMed ID: 31553470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cost-effectiveness of Osimertinib as a Second-line Treatment in Patients With EGFR-mutated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in China.
    Guan H; Liu G; Xie F; Sheng Y; Shi L
    Clin Ther; 2019 Nov; 41(11):2308-2320.e11. PubMed ID: 31607559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cost-effectiveness of osimertinib versus standard EGFR-TKI as first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer in Australia.
    Khoo T; Gao L
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2021 Jun; 21(3):415-423. PubMed ID: 33151783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Combined epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor and chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer: chemo-refractoriness of cells harboring sensitizing-EGFR mutations in the presence of gefitinib.
    Tsai CM; Chen JT; Chiu CH; Lai CL; Hsiao SY; Chang KT
    Lung Cancer; 2013 Nov; 82(2):305-12. PubMed ID: 24055492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cost-effectiveness of three strategies for second-line erlotinib initiation in nonsmall-cell lung cancer: the ERMETIC study part 3.
    Borget I; Cadranel J; Pignon JP; Quoix E; Coudert B; Westeel V; Dansin E; Madelaine J; Madroszyk A; Friard S; Daniel C; Morin F; Chouaid C;
    Eur Respir J; 2012 Jan; 39(1):172-9. PubMed ID: 21659409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cost-effectiveness analysis of the first-line EGFR-TKIs in patients with non-small cell lung cancer harbouring EGFR mutations.
    Holleman MS; Al MJ; Zaim R; Groen HJM; Uyl-de Groot CA
    Eur J Health Econ; 2020 Feb; 21(1):153-164. PubMed ID: 31541309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A phase 2 study of bevacizumab in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer harboring mutations of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) after failing first-line EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (HANSHIN Oncology Group 0109).
    Hattori Y; Satouchi M; Shimada T; Urata Y; Yoneda T; Mori M; Nishimura T; Sunadome H; Kumagai T; Imamura F; Fujita S; Kaji R; Hata A; Tachihara M; Morita S; Negoro S
    Lung Cancer; 2015 Feb; 87(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 25553650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Factors associated with a poor response to gefitinib in the NEJ002 study: smoking and the L858R mutation.
    Fukuhara T; Maemondo M; Inoue A; Kobayashi K; Sugawara S; Oizumi S; Isobe H; Gemma A; Harada M; Yoshizawa H; Kinoshita I; Fujita Y; Saijo Y; Hagiwara K; Morita S; Nukiwa T
    Lung Cancer; 2015 May; 88(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 25726043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of Gefitinib Versus Chemotherapy in Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer with Exon 19 Deletion.
    Watanabe S; Inoue A; Nukiwa T; Kobayashi K
    Anticancer Res; 2015 Dec; 35(12):6957-61. PubMed ID: 26637922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cost-utility of afatinib and gefitinib as first-line treatment for EGFR-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
    Wang H; Zeng C; Li X; Wang Y; Li X; Ge W
    Future Oncol; 2019 Jan; 15(2):181-191. PubMed ID: 30320506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Efficacy of chemotherapy after first-line gefitinib therapy in EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer-data from a randomized Phase III study comparing gefitinib with carboplatin plus paclitaxel (NEJ002).
    Miyauchi E; Inoue A; Kobayashi K; Maemondo M; Sugawara S; Oizumi S; Isobe H; Gemma A; Saijo Y; Yoshizawa H; Hagiwara K; Nukiwa T;
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2015 Jul; 45(7):670-6. PubMed ID: 25877748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Budget Impact Analysis of Afatinib for First-Line Treatment of Patients with Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Exon 19 Deletions or Exon 21 Substitution Mutations in a U.S. Health Plan.
    Graham J; Earnshaw S; Burslem K; Lim J
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2018 Jun; 24(6):544-553. PubMed ID: 29799327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cost-effectiveness of afatinib, gefitinib, erlotinib and pemetrexed-based chemotherapy as first-line treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in China.
    Gu X; Zhang Q; Chu YB; Zhao YY; Zhang YJ; Kuo D; Su B; Wu B
    Lung Cancer; 2019 Jan; 127():84-89. PubMed ID: 30642557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cost-effectiveness analysis of cisplatin plus etoposide and carboplatin plus paclitaxel in a phase III randomized trial for non-small cell lung cancer.
    Thongprasert S; Permsuwan U; Ruengorn C; Charoentum C; Chewaskulyong B
    Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2011 Dec; 7(4):369-75. PubMed ID: 22151987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.