179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26259891)
1. Mixed culture models for predicting intestinal microbial interactions between Escherichia coli and Lactobacillus in the presence of probiotic Bacillus subtilis.
Yang JJ; Niu CC; Guo XH
Benef Microbes; 2015; 6(6):871-7. PubMed ID: 26259891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Enhanced viability of Lactobacillus reuteri for probiotics production in mixed solid-state fermentation in the presence of Bacillus subtilis.
Zhang YR; Xiong HR; Guo XH
Folia Microbiol (Praha); 2014 Jan; 59(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 23775321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Screening of Bacillus strains as potential probiotics and subsequent confirmation of the in vivo effectiveness of Bacillus subtilis MA139 in pigs.
Guo X; Li D; Lu W; Piao X; Chen X
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2006 Aug; 90(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 16820971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new strategy to apply Bacillus subtilis MA139 for the production of solid-state fermentation feed.
Ying W; Zhu R; Lu W; Gong L
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2009 Aug; 49(2):229-34. PubMed ID: 19500243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of probiotic and prebiotic-like effects of Bacillus subtilis BN on growth of lactobacilli.
Horie M; Koike T; Sugino S; Umeno A; Yoshida Y
J Gen Appl Microbiol; 2018 Mar; 64(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 29225285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improved growth and viability of lactobacilli in the presence of Bacillus subtilis (natto), catalase, or subtilisin.
Hosoi T; Ametani A; Kiuchi K; Kaminogawa S
Can J Microbiol; 2000 Oct; 46(10):892-7. PubMed ID: 11068675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Prebiotic lactitol as a component of biopreparation from aerobic bacilli].
Saphronova LA; Osadchaia AI; Iliash VM
Mikrobiol Z; 2008; 70(6):34-41. PubMed ID: 19351047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening of
Wang W; Ma H; Yu H; Qin G; Tan Z; Wang Y; Pang H
Molecules; 2020 Sep; 25(19):. PubMed ID: 33003556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In Vitro Evaluation of Swine-Derived Lactobacillus reuteri: Probiotic Properties and Effects on Intestinal Porcine Epithelial Cells Challenged with Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88.
Wang Z; Wang L; Chen Z; Ma X; Yang X; Zhang J; Jiang Z
J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2016 Jun; 26(6):1018-25. PubMed ID: 26907754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Joint cultivation of Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli strains promising for obtaining complex probiotic].
Tsaruk'ianova IG; Osadchaia AI
Mikrobiol Z; 2007; 69(2):43-9. PubMed ID: 17494334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Growth peculiarities of probiotic strains of Bacillus subtilis at their joint cultivation in deep conditions].
Kharkhota MA; Osadchaia AI; Avdeeva LV
Mikrobiol Z; 2011; 73(6):25-31. PubMed ID: 22308748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of Bacillus subtilis C-3102 spores as a probiotic feed supplement on growth performance, noxious gas emission, and intestinal microflora in broilers.
Jeong JS; Kim IH
Poult Sci; 2014 Dec; 93(12):3097-103. PubMed ID: 25260523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro and in vivo activity of new strains of Bacillus subtilis against ESBL-producing Escherichia coli: an experimental study.
Ishnaiwer M; Bezabih Y; Javaudin F; Sassi M; Bemer P; Batard E; Dion M
J Appl Microbiol; 2022 Mar; 132(3):2270-2279. PubMed ID: 34679216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inhibition of adhesion of Escherichia coli K88 to piglet ileal mucus by Lactobacillus spp.
Blomberg L; Henriksson A; Conway PL
Appl Environ Microbiol; 1993 Jan; 59(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 8439162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Probiotic Potential and Wide-spectrum Antimicrobial Activity of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Infant Feces.
Wang X; Wang W; Lv H; Zhang H; Liu Y; Zhang M; Wang Y; Tan Z
Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins; 2021 Feb; 13(1):90-101. PubMed ID: 32405962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of Taraxacum and Astragalus extracts combined with probiotic Bacillus subtilis and Lactobacillus on Escherichia coli-infected broiler chickens.
Liang W; Li H; Zhou H; Wang M; Zhao X; Sun X; Li C; Zhang X
Poult Sci; 2021 Apr; 100(4):101007. PubMed ID: 33647724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of probiotics on the basis of Bacillus subtilis and Bifidobacterium longum on the biochemical parameters of the animal organism.
Kvan OV; Gavrish IA; Lebedev SV; Korotkova AM; Miroshnikova EP; Serdaeva VA; Bykov AV; Davydova NO
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Jan; 25(3):2175-2183. PubMed ID: 29116533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Encapsulation of beneficial probiotic bacteria in extracellular matrix from biofilm-forming Bacillus subtilis.
Yahav S; Berkovich Z; Ostrov I; Reifen R; Shemesh M
Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol; 2018; 46(sup2):974-982. PubMed ID: 29806505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. New crosstalk between probiotics Lactobacillus plantarum and Bacillus subtilis.
Yu T; Kong J; Zhang L; Gu X; Wang M; Guo T
Sci Rep; 2019 Sep; 9(1):13151. PubMed ID: 31511589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The resistance of Bacillus, Bifidobacterium, and Lactobacillus strains with claimed probiotic properties in different food matrices exposed to simulated gastrointestinal tract conditions.
Soares MB; Martinez RCR; Pereira EPR; Balthazar CF; Cruz AG; Ranadheera CS; Sant'Ana AS
Food Res Int; 2019 Nov; 125():108542. PubMed ID: 31554104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
