These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
665 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26260531)
1. Is transperineal prostate biopsy more accurate than transrectal biopsy in determining final Gleason score and clinical risk category? A comparative analysis. Scott S; Samaratunga H; Chabert C; Breckenridge M; Gianduzzo T BJU Int; 2015 Oct; 116 Suppl 3():26-30. PubMed ID: 26260531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume. Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Unilateral positive biopsies in low risk prostate cancer patients diagnosed with extended transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy schemes do not predict unilateral prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy. Gallina A; Maccagnano C; Suardi N; Capitanio U; Abdollah F; Raber M; Salonia A; Scattoni V; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Briganti A BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(2 Pt 2):E64-8. PubMed ID: 22093108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cribriform morphology predicts upstaging after radical prostatectomy in patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer at transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided needle biopsy. Keefe DT; Schieda N; El Hallani S; Breau RH; Morash C; Robertson SJ; Mai KT; Belanger EC; Flood TA Virchows Arch; 2015 Oct; 467(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 26229020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transperineal prostate biopsy detects significant cancer in patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and previous negative transrectal biopsies. Dimmen M; Vlatkovic L; Hole KH; Nesland JM; Brennhovd B; Axcrona K BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(2 Pt 2):E69-75. PubMed ID: 22093091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Small transrectal ultrasound volume predicts clinically significant Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy: results from the SEARCH database. Turley RS; Hamilton RJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Aronson WJ; Presti JC; Amling CL; Freedland SJ; J Urol; 2008 Feb; 179(2):523-7; discussion 527-8. PubMed ID: 18076952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical and pathologic predictors of Gleason sum upgrading in patients after radical prostatectomy: results from a single institution series. Tilki D; Schlenker B; John M; Buchner A; Stanislaus P; Gratzke C; Karl A; Tan GY; Ergün S; Tewari AK; Stief CG; Seitz M; Reich O Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(5):508-14. PubMed ID: 19837614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Significant upgrading affects a third of men diagnosed with prostate cancer: predictive nomogram and internal validation. Chun FK; Briganti A; Shariat SF; Graefen M; Montorsi F; Erbersdobler A; Steuber T; Salonia A; Currlin E; Scattoni V; Friedrich MG; Schlomm T; Haese A; Michl U; Colombo R; Heinzer H; Valiquette L; Rigatti P; Roehrborn CG; Huland H; Karakiewicz PI BJU Int; 2006 Aug; 98(2):329-34. PubMed ID: 16879673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preoperative prostate-specific antigen isoform p2PSA and its derivatives, %p2PSA and prostate health index, predict pathologic outcomes in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Guazzoni G; Lazzeri M; Nava L; Lughezzani G; Larcher A; Scattoni V; Gadda GM; Bini V; Cestari A; Buffi NM; Freschi M; Rigatti P; Montorsi F Eur Urol; 2012 Mar; 61(3):455-66. PubMed ID: 22078333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Utility of Gleason pattern 4 morphologies detected on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies for prediction of upgrading or upstaging in Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer. Flood TA; Schieda N; Keefe DT; Breau RH; Morash C; Hogan K; Belanger EC; Mai KT; Robertson SJ Virchows Arch; 2016 Sep; 469(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 27394432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Underestimation of Gleason score at prostate biopsy reflects sampling error in lower volume tumours. Corcoran NM; Hovens CM; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Casey RG; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Goldenberg SL; Costello AJ BJU Int; 2012 Mar; 109(5):660-4. PubMed ID: 21895937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pre-biopsy 3-Tesla MRI and targeted biopsy of the index prostate cancer: correlation with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Patel U; Dasgupta P; Challacombe B; Cahill D; Brown C; Patel R; Kirby R BJU Int; 2017 Jan; 119(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 27153933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Postoperative upgrading of prostate cancer in men ≥75 years: a propensity score-matched analysis. Herlemann A; Buchner A; Kretschmer A; Apfelbeck M; Stief CG; Gratzke C; Tritschler S World J Urol; 2017 Oct; 35(10):1517-1524. PubMed ID: 28493044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Upgrade in Gleason score between prostate biopsies and pathology following radical prostatectomy significantly impacts upon the risk of biochemical recurrence. Corcoran NM; Hong MK; Casey RG; Hurtado-Coll A; Peters J; Harewood L; Goldenberg SL; Hovens CM; Costello AJ; Gleave ME BJU Int; 2011 Oct; 108(8 Pt 2):E202-10. PubMed ID: 21443656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Localising prostate cancer: comparison of endorectal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and 3D-MR spectroscopic imaging with transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy. Goris Gbenou MC; Peltier A; Addla SK; Lemort M; Bollens R; Larsimont D; Roumeguère T; Schulman CC; van Velthoven R Urol Int; 2012; 88(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 22004874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Magnetic resonance imaging-transectal ultrasound image-fusion biopsies accurately characterize the index tumor: correlation with step-sectioned radical prostatectomy specimens in 135 patients. Baco E; Ukimura O; Rud E; Vlatkovic L; Svindland A; Aron M; Palmer S; Matsugasumi T; Marien A; Bernhard JC; Rewcastle JC; Eggesbø HB; Gill IS Eur Urol; 2015 Apr; 67(4):787-94. PubMed ID: 25240973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prostate-specific antigen vs prostate-specific antigen density as a predictor of upgrading in men diagnosed with Gleason 6 prostate cancer by contemporary multicore prostate biopsy. Oh JJ; Hong SK; Lee JK; Lee BK; Lee S; Kwon OS; Byun SS; Lee SE BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E494-9. PubMed ID: 22540236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Upgrading and downgrading of prostate needle biopsy specimens: risk factors and clinical implications. Freedland SJ; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Presti JC; Urology; 2007 Mar; 69(3):495-9. PubMed ID: 17382152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved accuracy in predicting the presence of Gleason pattern 4/5 prostate cancer by three-dimensional 26-core systematic biopsy. Numao N; Kawakami S; Yokoyama M; Yonese J; Arisawa C; Ishikawa Y; Ando M; Fukui I; Kihara K Eur Urol; 2007 Dec; 52(6):1663-8. PubMed ID: 17240041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development and internal validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of prostate cancer Gleason sum upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology. Chun FK; Steuber T; Erbersdobler A; Currlin E; Walz J; Schlomm T; Haese A; Heinzer H; McCormack M; Huland H; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI Eur Urol; 2006 May; 49(5):820-6. PubMed ID: 16439050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]