163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26260855)
1. A comment on two-locus epistatic interaction models for genome-wide association studies.
Sohn KA; Wee K
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2015 Dec; 13(6):1571004. PubMed ID: 26260855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictive rule inference for epistatic interaction detection in genome-wide association studies.
Wan X; Yang C; Yang Q; Xue H; Tang NL; Yu W
Bioinformatics; 2010 Jan; 26(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 19880365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating the detection ability of a range of epistasis detection methods on simulated data for pure and impure epistatic models.
Russ D; Williams JA; Cardoso VR; Bravo-Merodio L; Pendleton SC; Aziz F; Acharjee A; Gkoutos GV
PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0263390. PubMed ID: 35180244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fast detection of high-order epistatic interactions in genome-wide association studies using information theoretic measure.
Leem S; Jeong HH; Lee J; Wee K; Sohn KA
Comput Biol Chem; 2014 Jun; 50():19-28. PubMed ID: 24581733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cloud computing for detecting high-order genome-wide epistatic interaction via dynamic clustering.
Guo X; Meng Y; Yu N; Pan Y
BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Apr; 15():102. PubMed ID: 24717145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ant colony optimization with an automatic adjustment mechanism for detecting epistatic interactions.
Guan B; Zhao Y; Sun W
Comput Biol Chem; 2018 Dec; 77():354-362. PubMed ID: 30466044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A whole-genome simulator capable of modeling high-order epistasis for complex disease.
Yang W; Gu CC
Genet Epidemiol; 2013 Nov; 37(7):686-94. PubMed ID: 24114848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genetic studies of complex human diseases: characterizing SNP-disease associations using Bayesian networks.
Han B; Chen XW; Talebizadeh Z; Xu H
BMC Syst Biol; 2012; 6 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S14. PubMed ID: 23281790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. GWIS--model-free, fast and exhaustive search for epistatic interactions in case-control GWAS.
Goudey B; Rawlinson D; Wang Q; Shi F; Ferra H; Campbell RM; Stern L; Inouye MT; Ong CS; Kowalczyk A
BMC Genomics; 2013; 14 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S10. PubMed ID: 23819779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nature-Inspired Multiobjective Epistasis Elucidation from Genome-Wide Association Studies.
Li X; Zhang S; Wong KC
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2020; 17(1):226-237. PubMed ID: 29994485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A mixed two-stage method for detecting interactions in genomewide association studies.
Zuo Y; Kang G
J Theor Biol; 2010 Feb; 262(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 19896954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Epi2Loc: an R package to investigate two-locus epistatic models.
Walters RK; Laurin C; Lubke GH
Twin Res Hum Genet; 2014 Aug; 17(4):272-8. PubMed ID: 24983251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. SNPHarvester: a filtering-based approach for detecting epistatic interactions in genome-wide association studies.
Yang C; He Z; Wan X; Yang Q; Xue H; Yu W
Bioinformatics; 2009 Feb; 25(4):504-11. PubMed ID: 19098029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prioritizing tests of epistasis through hierarchical representation of genomic redundancies.
Cowman T; Koyutürk M
Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Aug; 45(14):e131. PubMed ID: 28605458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. CMDR based differential evolution identifies the epistatic interaction in genome-wide association studies.
Yang CH; Chuang LY; Lin YD
Bioinformatics; 2017 Aug; 33(15):2354-2362. PubMed ID: 28379338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. IndOR: a new statistical procedure to test for SNP-SNP epistasis in genome-wide association studies.
Emily M
Stat Med; 2012 Sep; 31(21):2359-73. PubMed ID: 22711278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. GEP-EpiSeeker: a gene expression programming-based method for epistatic interaction detection in genome-wide association studies.
Peng YZ; Lin Y; Huang Y; Li Y; Luo G; Liao J
BMC Genomics; 2021 Dec; 22(Suppl 1):910. PubMed ID: 34930147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. KNN-MDR: a learning approach for improving interactions mapping performances in genome wide association studies.
Abo Alchamlat S; Farnir F
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Mar; 18(1):184. PubMed ID: 28327091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. FHSA-SED: Two-Locus Model Detection for Genome-Wide Association Study with Harmony Search Algorithm.
Tuo S; Zhang J; Yuan X; Zhang Y; Liu Z
PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0150669. PubMed ID: 27014873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detecting epistatic effects in association studies at a genomic level based on an ensemble approach.
Li J; Horstman B; Chen Y
Bioinformatics; 2011 Jul; 27(13):i222-9. PubMed ID: 21685074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
