These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26261111)

  • 1. Comparison of resident performance in interpreting mammography results using a probabilistic or a natural frequency presentation: a multi-institutional randomized experimental study.
    Msaouel P; Kappos T; Tasoulis A; Apostolopoulos AP; Lekkas I; Tripodaki ES; Keramaris NC
    Educ Health (Abingdon); 2015; 28(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 26261111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Novel hybrid objective structured assessment of technical skills/objective structured clinical examinations in comprehensive perioperative breast care: a three-year analysis of outcomes.
    Maker VK; Bonne S
    J Surg Educ; 2009; 66(6):344-51. PubMed ID: 20142133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Overestimation of test effects in clinical judgment.
    Lyman GH; Balducci L
    J Cancer Educ; 1993; 8(4):297-307. PubMed ID: 8186081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiology resident mammography training: interpretation difficulty and error-making patterns.
    Grimm LJ; Kuzmiak CM; Ghate SV; Yoon SC; Mazurowski MA
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Jul; 21(7):888-92. PubMed ID: 24928157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are university-based residency training programs lacking in resident education of proper diagnosis and treatment for common skin and breast lesions?
    Cohen SM; Fishinghawk BG; Urban DM; Schropp KP; Person E; Mammen JM; Aires D; Cohen MS
    Am J Surg; 2012 Dec; 204(6):981-6; discussion 986-7. PubMed ID: 23231937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of cognitive biases and biostatistics knowledge of medical residents: a multicenter, cross-sectional questionnaire study.
    Msaouel P; Kappos T; Tasoulis A; Apostolopoulos AP; Lekkas I; Tripodaki ES; Keramaris NC
    Med Educ Online; 2014; 19():23646. PubMed ID: 24646439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Physician and Nonphysician Estimates of Positive Predictive Value in Diagnostic v. Mass Screening Mammography: An Examination of Bayesian Reasoning.
    Austin LC
    Med Decis Making; 2019 Feb; 39(2):108-118. PubMed ID: 30678607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visualizing the Bayesian 2-test case: The effect of tree diagrams on medical decision making.
    Binder K; Krauss S; Bruckmaier G; Marienhagen J
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0195029. PubMed ID: 29584770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Health professionals' and service users' interpretation of screening test results: experimental study.
    Bramwell R; West H; Salmon P
    BMJ; 2006 Aug; 333(7562):284. PubMed ID: 16840441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Status of residency training in mammography.
    Lubisich JP; Bassett LW; Bresch JA; Jessop NW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 May; 166(5):1189-91. PubMed ID: 8615267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ophthalmology resident surgical competency: a national survey.
    Binenbaum G; Volpe NJ
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Jul; 113(7):1237-44. PubMed ID: 16725202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing Resident Performance in Screening Mammography: Development of a Quantitative Algorithm.
    Lewis PJ; Rooney TB; Frazee TE; Poplack SP
    Acad Radiol; 2018 May; 25(5):659-664. PubMed ID: 29366681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Appraising and applying evidence about a diagnostic test during a performance-based assessment.
    Bergus G; Vogelgesang S; Tansey J; Franklin E; Feld R
    BMC Med Educ; 2004 Oct; 4():20. PubMed ID: 15482600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving mammographic decision accuracy by incorporating observer ratings with interpretation time.
    Saunders RS; Samei E
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Dec; 79 Spec No 2():S117-22. PubMed ID: 17209116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving residents' end-of-life communication skills with a short retreat: a randomized controlled trial.
    Szmuilowicz E; el-Jawahri A; Chiappetta L; Kamdar M; Block S
    J Palliat Med; 2010 Apr; 13(4):439-52. PubMed ID: 20201666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Resident training in breast imaging in Canada: current status.
    Garvin GJ; Taves DH; McCurdy LI
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1992 Jun; 43(3):188-90. PubMed ID: 1596761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Examining accuracy of screening mammography using an event order model.
    Paliwal P; Gelfand AE; Abraham L; Barlow W; Elmore JG
    Stat Med; 2006 Jan; 25(2):267-83. PubMed ID: 16381074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modeling the impact of treatment and screening on U.S. breast cancer mortality: a Bayesian approach.
    Berry DA; Inoue L; Shen Y; Venier J; Cohen D; Bondy M; Theriault R; Munsell MF
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2006; (36):30-6. PubMed ID: 17032892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving doctor-patient understanding of probability in communicating cancer-screening test findings.
    Hanoch Y
    J Health Commun; 2004; 9(4):327-35. PubMed ID: 15371085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography readers and their memory performance have no correlation with each other.
    Kok P; Pitman AG; Cawson JN; Gledhill S; Kremer S; Lawson J; Mehta K; Mercuri V; Shnier D; Taft R; Zentner L
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2010 Aug; 54(4):315-24. PubMed ID: 20718911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.