These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26262084)

  • 1. The Case for Conceptual and Computable Cross-Fertilization Between Audit and Feedback and Clinical Decision Support.
    Brown B; Peek N; Buchan I
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 216():419-23. PubMed ID: 26262084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inside the Black Box of Audit and Feedback: a Laboratory Study to Explore Determinants of Improvement Target Selection by Healthcare Professionals in Cardiac Rehabilitation.
    Gude WT; van der Veer SN; van Engen-Verheul MM; de Keizer NF; Peek N
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 216():424-8. PubMed ID: 26262085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Integrating Clinical Decision Support into EMR and PHR: a Case Study Using Anticoagulation.
    Chackery DG; Keshavjee K; Mirza K; Ghany A; Holbrook AM
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 208():98-103. PubMed ID: 25676955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electronic health records and clinical decision support systems: impact on national ambulatory care quality.
    Romano MJ; Stafford RS
    Arch Intern Med; 2011 May; 171(10):897-903. PubMed ID: 21263077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using the ACR Accreditation Process As a Quality Improvement Tool.
    Nowak K; Bar-Ad V; Ferguson L; McAna J; Harrison AS; Yu Y; Doyle L
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Jul; 13(7):881-3. PubMed ID: 26908397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving Performance on Preventive Health Quality Measures Using Clinical Decision Support to Capture Care Done Elsewhere and Patient Exceptions.
    Bowen ME; Bhat D; Fish J; Moran B; Howell-Stampley T; Kirk L; Persell SD; Halm EA
    Am J Med Qual; 2018; 33(3):237-245. PubMed ID: 29034685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Future of electronic health records: implications for decision support.
    Rothman B; Leonard JC; Vigoda MM
    Mt Sinai J Med; 2012; 79(6):757-68. PubMed ID: 23239213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Integration of Hospital Information and Clinical Decision Support Systems to Enable the Reuse of Electronic Health Record Data.
    Kopanitsa G
    Methods Inf Med; 2017 May; 56(3):238-247. PubMed ID: 28361157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electronic Health Records and Use of Clinical Decision Support.
    Mills S
    Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am; 2019 Jun; 31(2):125-131. PubMed ID: 31047087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Making clinical decision support more supportive.
    Mann DM
    Med Care; 2011 Feb; 49(2):115-6. PubMed ID: 21239953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimizing Digital Health Informatics Interventions Through Unobtrusive Quantitative Process Evaluations.
    Gude WT; van der Veer SN; de Keizer NF; Coiera E; Peek N
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 228():594-8. PubMed ID: 27577453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. AHRQ EPC Series on Improving Translation of Evidence into Practice for the Learning Health System: Introduction.
    Fiordalisi C; Borsky A; Chang S; Guise JM
    Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf; 2019 Aug; 45(8):558-565. PubMed ID: 31378276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changes in performance after implementation of a multifaceted electronic-health-record-based quality improvement system.
    Persell SD; Kaiser D; Dolan NC; Andrews B; Levi S; Khandekar J; Gavagan T; Thompson JA; Friesema EM; Baker DW
    Med Care; 2011 Feb; 49(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 21178789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Informatics and operations--let's get integrated.
    Marsolo K
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2013 Jan; 20(1):122-4. PubMed ID: 22940670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Facilitating action planning within audit and feedback interventions: a mixed-methods process evaluation of an action implementation toolbox in intensive care.
    Gude WT; Roos-Blom MJ; van der Veer SN; Dongelmans DA; de Jonge E; Peek N; de Keizer NF
    Implement Sci; 2019 Sep; 14(1):90. PubMed ID: 31533841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Theory-based and evidence-based design of audit and feedback programmes: examples from two clinical intervention studies.
    Hysong SJ; Kell HJ; Petersen LA; Campbell BA; Trautner BW
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2017 Apr; 26(4):323-334. PubMed ID: 27288054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reporting and design elements of audit and feedback interventions: a secondary review.
    Colquhoun H; Michie S; Sales A; Ivers N; Grimshaw JM; Carroll K; Chalifoux M; Eva K; Brehaut J
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2017 Jan; 26(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 26811541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Information system support as a critical success factor for chronic disease management: Necessary but not sufficient.
    Green CJ; Fortin P; Maclure M; Macgregor A; Robinson S
    Int J Med Inform; 2006 Dec; 75(12):818-28. PubMed ID: 16920013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using electronic health record clinical decision support is associated with improved quality of care.
    Mishuris RG; Linder JA; Bates DW; Bitton A
    Am J Manag Care; 2014 Oct; 20(10):e445-52. PubMed ID: 25414982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical decision support and rich clinical repositories: a symbiotic relationship: comment on "Electronic health records and clinical decision support systems".
    McDonald C; Abhyankar S
    Arch Intern Med; 2011 May; 171(10):903-5. PubMed ID: 21263079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.