These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26262541)

  • 1. Monitoring the Amount of Practical Use of eHealth on National Level by Use of Log Data: Lessons Learned.
    Villumsen S; Harðardóttir GA; Kangas M; Gilstad H; Brattheim BJ; Reponen J; Hypponen H; Nøhr C
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 218():138-144. PubMed ID: 26262541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Monitoring and Benchmarking eHealth in the Nordic Countries.
    Nøhr C; Koch S; Vimarlund V; Gilstad H; Faxvaag A; Hardardottir GA; Andreassen HK; Kangas M; Reponen J; Bertelsen P; Villumsen S; Hyppönen H
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2018; 247():86-90. PubMed ID: 29677928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Secondary use of structured patient data: interim results of a systematic review.
    Vuokko R; Mäkelä-Bengs P; Hyppönen H; Doupi P
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 210():291-5. PubMed ID: 25991152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Usability Evaluation of a Medication Reconciliation and Allergy Review (MRAR) Kiosk: A Methodological Approach for Analyzing User Interactions.
    Lesselroth B; Adams K; Tallett S; Ragland S; Church V; Borycki EM; Kushniruk A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 218():61-67. PubMed ID: 26262528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contrasting Electronic Health Records from Two Different Hospital Systems: Radiologists' Perspective.
    Rinzler E; Shaves S
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Aug; 13(8):960-3. PubMed ID: 26810638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nordic eHealth indicators: organisation of research, first results and plan for the future.
    Hyppönen H; Faxvaag A; Gilstad H; Hardardottir GA; Jerlvall L; Kangas M; Koch S; Nøhr C; Pehrsson T; Reponen J; Walldius Å; Vimarlund V
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():273-7. PubMed ID: 23920559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Barriers to using eHealth data for clinical performance feedback in Malawi: A case study.
    Landis-Lewis Z; Manjomo R; Gadabu OJ; Kam M; Simwaka BN; Zickmund SL; Chimbwandira F; Douglas GP; Jacobson RS
    Int J Med Inform; 2015 Oct; 84(10):868-75. PubMed ID: 26238704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Disturbing or facilitating?--on the Usability of Swedish eHealth Systems 2013.
    Scandurra I; Hägglund M; Persson A; Ahlfeldt RM
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 205():221-5. PubMed ID: 25160178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characterizing Patient-Generated Clinical Data and Associated Implications for Electronic Health Records.
    Arsoniadis EG; Tambyraja R; Khairat S; Jahansouz C; Scheppmann D; Kwaan MR; Hultman G; Melton GB
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 216():158-62. PubMed ID: 26262030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Usage experience with the document archiving and communication system for the storage and retrieval of medical records.
    Takeda T; Ueda K; Manabe S; Teramoto K; Mihara N; Matsumura Y
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():1021. PubMed ID: 23920795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of electronic health record on the flow of information - a pilot study.
    Kuusisto A; Asikainen P; Iltanen S; Saranto K
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():1060. PubMed ID: 23920834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Barriers to the Success of Health ICT Implementations - A Report from Norway.
    Granja C; Ulriksen GH; Byd K; Bolle SR; Hartvigsen G
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 221():121. PubMed ID: 27071895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of a Video Coding Scheme for Analyzing the Usability and Usefulness of Health Information Systems.
    Kushniruk AW; Borycki EM
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 218():68-73. PubMed ID: 26262529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating the data completeness in the Electronic Health Record after the Implementation of an Outpatient Electronic Health Record.
    Soto M; Capurro D; Catalán S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 216():885. PubMed ID: 26262187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. eHealth indicators: results of an expert workshop.
    Hyppönen H; Ammenwerth E; Nohr C; Faxvaag A; Walldius A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 180():328-32. PubMed ID: 22874206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ten Demands of Improved Usability in eHealth and Some Progress - Co-Creation by Health and Social Care Professionals.
    Scandurra I; Liljequist D
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 225():227-31. PubMed ID: 27332196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identification of Patient Safety Risks Associated with Electronic Health Records: A Software Quality Perspective.
    Virginio LA; Ricarte IL
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 216():55-9. PubMed ID: 26262009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Incorporating Pharmacy Dispensing Records into Medical Records: Usability Challenges.
    Motulsky A; Couture I; Weir D; Tamblyn R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 221():126. PubMed ID: 27071900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing approaches to measuring the adoption and usability of electronic health records: lessons learned from Canada, Denmark and Finland.
    Kushniruk A; Kaipio J; Nieminen M; Nøhr C; Borycki E
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():367-71. PubMed ID: 23920578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of central enterprise architecture elements in models of six eHealth projects.
    Virkanen H; Mykkänen J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 205():141-5. PubMed ID: 25160162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.