These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26264133)

  • 1. Direct PCR Improves the Recovery of DNA from Various Substrates.
    Templeton JE; Taylor D; Handt O; Skuza P; Linacre A
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Nov; 60(6):1558-62. PubMed ID: 26264133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A practical study on direct PCR amplification using the GlobalFiler™ PCR Amplification Kit on human bloodstains collected with microFLOQ™ Direct swabs.
    Chong KWY; Wong Y; Ng BK; Lim WSH; Rosli AR; Syn CKC
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jul; 300():43-50. PubMed ID: 31075566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Direct PCR amplification of DNA from human bloodstains, saliva, and touch samples collected with microFLOQ
    Ambers A; Wiley R; Novroski N; Budowle B
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Jan; 32():80-87. PubMed ID: 29126000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison between direct PCR and extraction to generate DNA profiles from samples retrieved from various substrates.
    Swaran YC; Welch L
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 May; 6(3):407-12. PubMed ID: 21925992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. PE-Swab Direct STR Amplification of Forensic Touch DNA Samples.
    Liu JY
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 May; 60(3):693-701. PubMed ID: 25684449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of Direct PCR Amplification Using Various Swabs and Washing Reagents.
    Altshuler H; Roy R
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Nov; 60(6):1542-52. PubMed ID: 26331283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of a modified p-dimethylaminocinnamaldehyde solution for touch DNA analysis and its application to STR analysis.
    Yano R; Shimoda O; Okitsu T; Sakurada M; Ueno Y
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jan; 38():86-92. PubMed ID: 30391625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combined DNA Typing and Protein Identification from Unfired Brass Cartridges,,
    Sterling SA; Mason KE; Anex DS; Parker GJ; Hart B; Prinz M
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Sep; 64(5):1475-1481. PubMed ID: 30893480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recovery of mtDNA from unfired metallic ammunition components with an assessment of sequence profile quality and DNA damage through MPS analysis.
    Holland MM; Bonds RM; Holland CA; McElhoe JA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Mar; 39():86-96. PubMed ID: 30611826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. DNA profiles from clothing fibers using direct PCR.
    Blackie R; Taylor D; Linacre A
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2016 Sep; 12(3):331-5. PubMed ID: 27421265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Forensic casework methodology for direct PCR amplification of blood swabs.
    Govindarajan N; Lemalu A; Patel J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Sep; 42():125-134. PubMed ID: 31306933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of STR profiles from firearms and fired cartridge cases.
    Horsman-Hall KM; Orihuela Y; Karczynski SL; Davis AL; Ban JD; Greenspoon SA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Sep; 3(4):242-50. PubMed ID: 19647709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of methods to improve the extraction and recovery of DNA from cotton swabs for forensic analysis.
    Adamowicz MS; Stasulli DM; Sobestanovich EM; Bille TW
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e116351. PubMed ID: 25549111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nondestructive Biological Evidence Collection with Alternative Swabs and Adhesive Lifters.
    Plaza DT; Mealy JL; Lane JN; Parsons MN; Bathrick AS; Slack DP
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 Mar; 61(2):485-488. PubMed ID: 27404622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Collection and direct amplification methods using the GlobalFiler™ kit for DNA recovered from common pipe bomb substrates.
    Tasker E; Mayes C; LaRue B; Hughes-Stamm S
    Sci Justice; 2019 Sep; 59(5):580-584. PubMed ID: 31472804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Towards developing forensically relevant single-cell pipelines by incorporating direct-to-PCR extraction: compatibility, signal quality, and allele detection.
    Sheth N; Swaminathan H; Gonzalez AJ; Duffy KR; Grgicak CM
    Int J Legal Med; 2021 May; 135(3):727-738. PubMed ID: 33484330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of DNA collection and retrieval from two swab types (cotton and nylon flocked swab) when processed using three QIAGEN extraction methods.
    Brownlow RJ; Dagnall KE; Ames CE
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 May; 57(3):713-7. PubMed ID: 22211626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of fingerprint samples, testing various conditions, for forensic DNA identification.
    Ostojic L; Wurmbach E
    Sci Justice; 2017 Jan; 57(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 28063583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visualising latent DNA on swabs.
    Kanokwongnuwut P; Kirkbride P; Linacre A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Oct; 291():115-123. PubMed ID: 30195152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Advantage of ForensiX Swabs in Retrieving and Preserving Biological Fluids.
    Mawlood SK; Alrowaithi M; Watson N
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 May; 60(3):686-9. PubMed ID: 25684353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.