These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26264133)

  • 21. A protocol for direct and rapid multiplex PCR amplification on forensically relevant samples.
    Verheij S; Harteveld J; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Mar; 6(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 21530436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Typing DNA profiles from previously enhanced fingerprints using direct PCR.
    Templeton JEL; Taylor D; Handt O; Linacre A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():276-282. PubMed ID: 28575840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of metal ions and DNA recovery from the surface of fired and unfired brass ammunition to improve STR profiling.
    Czado N; Houston R; Hughes S
    Int J Legal Med; 2024 Jul; 138(4):1265-1272. PubMed ID: 38433135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparison of four methods for PCR inhibitor removal.
    Hu Q; Liu Y; Yi S; Huang D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():94-97. PubMed ID: 25553520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Development of a normalized extraction to further aid in fast, high-throughput processing of forensic DNA reference samples.
    Connon CC; LeFebvre AK; Benjamin RC
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Nov; 25():112-124. PubMed ID: 27566134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Direct PCR amplification of forensic touch and other challenging DNA samples: A review.
    Cavanaugh SE; Bathrick AS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Jan; 32():40-49. PubMed ID: 29059581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. DNA recovery from latent fingermarks treated with an infrared fluorescent fingerprint powder.
    Al Oleiwi A; Hussain I; McWhorter A; Sutton R; King RSP
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Aug; 277():e39-e43. PubMed ID: 28554784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Looking for the pinpoint: Optimizing identification, recovery and DNA extraction of micro traces in forensic casework.
    Dierig L; Schmidt M; Wiegand P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jan; 44():102191. PubMed ID: 31756628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Simplified Direct PCR Method for Reference Buccal Samples Using a Non-FTA Card by Omitting the Pretreatment Step.
    Jung JY; Ryu GH; Kim DH; Kim JY; Hwang IK; Kang PW; Chun BW; Yoo SY
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Jan; 65(1):209-213. PubMed ID: 31433497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Trace DNA Sampling Success from Evidence Items Commonly Encountered in Forensic Casework.
    Dziak R; Peneder A; Buetter A; Hageman C
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 May; 63(3):835-841. PubMed ID: 28921603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The influence of swabbing solutions on DNA recovery from touch samples.
    Thomasma SM; Foran DR
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Mar; 58(2):465-9. PubMed ID: 23278347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Recovery of Trace DNA on Clothing: A Comparison of Mini-tape Lifting and Three Other Forensic Evidence Collection Techniques.
    Hess S; Haas C
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 Jan; 62(1):187-191. PubMed ID: 27864934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Double swab technique for collecting touched evidence.
    Pang BC; Cheung BK
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2007 Jul; 9(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 17320457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Extraction and Recovery Efficiency of Pure DNA for Different Types of Swabs.
    Bruijns BB; Tiggelaar RM; Gardeniers H
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Sep; 63(5):1492-1499. PubMed ID: 29890011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Copan microFLOQ® Direct Swab collection of bloodstains, saliva, and semen on cotton cloth.
    Sherier AJ; Kieser RE; Novroski NMM; Wendt FR; King JL; Woerner AE; Ambers A; Garofano P; Budowle B
    Int J Legal Med; 2020 Jan; 134(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 31165261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of the efficiency of Isohelix™ and Rayon swabs for recovery of DNA from metal surfaces.
    Bonsu DOM; Higgins D; Henry J; Austin JJ
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2021 Jun; 17(2):199-207. PubMed ID: 33180274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Impact of sample degradation and inhibition on field-based DNA identification of human remains.
    Dawnay N; Flamson R; Hall MJR; Steadman DW
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Nov; 37():46-53. PubMed ID: 30077890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Compatibility of DNA IQ™, QIAamp
    Lin SW; Ip SC; Lam TT; Tan TF; Yeung WL; Tam WM
    Int J Legal Med; 2017 Mar; 131(2):293-301. PubMed ID: 27654715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. High-throughput STR analysis for DNA database using direct PCR.
    Sim JE; Park SJ; Lee HC; Kim SY; Kim JY; Lee SH
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Jul; 58(4):989-92. PubMed ID: 23683293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A rapid screening method using DNA binding dyes to determine whether hair follicles have sufficient DNA for successful profiling.
    Haines AM; Linacre A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 May; 262():190-5. PubMed ID: 27038658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.