144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26264213)
1. Effect of anesthesia on gastroesophageal reflux in children: a study using BRAVO wireless pH study measurements.
Rodriguez L; Morley-Fletcher A; Souza A; Rosengaus L; Nurko S
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2015 Nov; 27(11):1553-8. PubMed ID: 26264213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 24 Versus 48-hour bravo pH monitoring.
Chander B; Hanley-Williams N; Deng Y; Sheth A
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2012 Mar; 46(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 21959323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Continuous 48-Hour Wireless Esophageal pH Monitoring in Children: Comparison Between Days 1 and 2.
Ravi A; Gunasekaran T; Berman J
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2016 Jan; 62(1):87-9. PubMed ID: 26196198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of Anesthesia on Pediatric pH Impedance.
Waasdorp Hurtado C; Sheiko MA; Gralla J; Kinder S; Kramer RE
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2016 Aug; 63(2):236-41. PubMed ID: 26720769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring in children with pathological acid gastroesophageal reflux: primary and secondary to food allergy. Part I. Intraesophageal pH values in distal channel; preliminary study and control studies--after 1, 2, 4 and 9 years of clinical observation as well as dietary and pharmacological treatment.
Semeniuk J; Kaczmarski M
Adv Med Sci; 2007; 52():199-205. PubMed ID: 18217419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bravo (wireless) ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring: how do day 1 and day 2 results compare?
Bechtold ML; Holly JS; Thaler K; Marshall JB
World J Gastroenterol; 2007 Aug; 13(30):4091-5. PubMed ID: 17696227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of prolonged 48-h wireless capsule esophageal pH monitoring on diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease and evaluation of the relationship between symptoms and reflux episodes.
Domingues GR; Moraes-Filho JP; Domingues AG
Arq Gastroenterol; 2011; 48(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 21537538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring in children with pathological acid gastroesophageal reflux: primary and secondary to food allergy. Part II. Intraesophageal pH values in proximal channel; preliminary study and control studies--after 1, 2, 4 and 9 years of clinical observation as well as dietary and pharmacological treatment.
Semeniuk J; Kaczmarski M
Adv Med Sci; 2007; 52():206-12. PubMed ID: 18217420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Children on the Autism Spectrum: A Study Evaluating the Tolerance and Utility of the BRAVO Wireless pH Monitoring.
Rodriguez L; Morley-Fletcher A; Winter H; Timothy B
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2022 Oct; 75(4):450-454. PubMed ID: 35830732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Wireless ambulatory pH studies: manometric or endoscopic guidance?
Nusrat S; Roy PM; Bielefeldt K
Dis Esophagus; 2012 Jan; 25(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 21676068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 24-hour esophageal pH-monitoring in children suspected of gastroesophageal reflux disease: analysis of intraesophageal pH monitoring values recorded in distal and proximal channel at diagnosis.
Semeniuk J; Kaczmarski M
World J Gastroenterol; 2007 Oct; 13(38):5108-15. PubMed ID: 17876877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sedation and Afternoon Placement of the 48-Hour Wireless Ambulatory pH Capsule Results in More Reflux on the First Day.
Patel R; Chae S; Kumar A; Richter JE
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2017 Aug; 51(7):594-598. PubMed ID: 27548735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interference with daily activities and major adverse events during esophageal pH monitoring with bravo wireless capsule versus conventional intranasal catheter: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Iluyomade A; Olowoyeye A; Fadahunsi O; Thomas L; Libend CN; Ragunathan K; Fenster J; Vignesh S
Dis Esophagus; 2017 Feb; 30(3):1-9. PubMed ID: 26952638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two years' experience of using the Bravo wireless oesophageal pH monitoring system at a single UK tertiary centre.
Rao NM; Campbell DI; Rao P
Acta Paediatr; 2017 Feb; 106(2):312-315. PubMed ID: 27862298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Catheter-free pH-metry using the Bravo capsule versus standard pH-metry in patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD)].
Mönkemüller K; Neumann H; Fry LC; Kolfenbach S; Malfertheiner P
Z Gastroenterol; 2009 Apr; 47(4):351-6. PubMed ID: 19358061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Acid gastroesophageal reflux and intensity of symptoms in children with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Comparison of primary gastroesophageal reflux and gastroesophageal reflux secondary to food allergy.
Semeniuk J; Kaczmarski M
Adv Med Sci; 2008; 53(2):293-9. PubMed ID: 19095581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Wireless esophageal pH monitoring in children.
Gunnarsdóttir A; Stenström P; Arnbjörnsson E
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2008 Jun; 18(3):443-7. PubMed ID: 18503382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 24-hour gastroesophageal double pH monitoring acid and alkaline gastroesophageal and duodenogastric refluxes in pediatric patients.
Wang W; Ji S; Wang H; Wang W
Chin Med J (Engl); 1998 Oct; 111(10):881-4. PubMed ID: 11189231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Esophageal pH monitoring with the BRAVO capsule: experience in a single tertiary medical center.
Cabrera J; Davis M; Horn D; Pfefferkorn M; Croffie JM
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2011 Oct; 53(4):404-8. PubMed ID: 21519281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of data obtained from sedated versus unsedated wireless telemetry capsule placement: does sedation affect the results of ambulatory 48-hour pH testing?
Belafsky PC; Godin DA; Garcia JC; Rahim N
Laryngoscope; 2005 Jun; 115(6):1109-13. PubMed ID: 15933532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
