These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26264518)

  • 1. Car Gestures - Advisory warning using additional steering wheel angles.
    Maag C; Schneider N; Lübbeke T; Weisswange TH; Goerick C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Oct; 83():143-53. PubMed ID: 26264518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How to warn drivers in various safety-critical situations - Different strategies, different reactions.
    Winkler S; Kazazi J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():410-426. PubMed ID: 29703596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Practice makes better - Learning effects of driving with a multi-stage collision warning.
    Winkler S; Kazazi J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():398-409. PubMed ID: 29477461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cooperative warning systems: The impact of false and unnecessary alarms on drivers' compliance.
    Naujoks F; Kiesel A; Neukum A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Dec; 97():162-175. PubMed ID: 27639195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness of visual warnings on young drivers hazard anticipation and hazard mitigation abilities.
    Hajiseyedjavadi F; Zhang T; Agrawal R; Knodler M; Fisher D; Samuel S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():41-52. PubMed ID: 29277384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adaptive forward collision warnings: The impact of imperfect technology on behavioral adaptation, warning effectiveness and acceptance.
    Reinmueller K; Steinhauser M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Jul; 128():217-229. PubMed ID: 31063907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lateral control assistance for car drivers: a comparison of motor priming and warning systems.
    Navarro J; Mars F; Hoc JM
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):950-60. PubMed ID: 17915609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of tactile, visual, and auditory warnings for rear-end collision prevention in simulated driving.
    Scott JJ; Gray R
    Hum Factors; 2008 Apr; 50(2):264-75. PubMed ID: 18516837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Brake reactions of distracted drivers to pedestrian Forward Collision Warning systems.
    Lubbe N
    J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():23-32. PubMed ID: 28454868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual advisory warnings about hidden dangers: Effects of specific symbols and spatial referencing on necessary and unnecessary warnings.
    Schwarz F; Fastenmeier W
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Oct; 72():25-36. PubMed ID: 29885725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Augmented reality warnings in vehicles: Effects of modality and specificity on effectiveness.
    Schwarz F; Fastenmeier W
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Apr; 101():55-66. PubMed ID: 28189059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intuitive steering assistance in critical understeer situations.
    Hildebrandt C; Schmidt M; Sedlmayr M; Pion O; Büyükyildiz G; Küçükay F
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16(5):484-90. PubMed ID: 25287808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age and gender differences in time to collision at braking from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Montgomery J; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S15-20. PubMed ID: 25307380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mirage events & driver haptic steering alerts in a motion-base driving simulator: A method for selecting an optimal HMI.
    Talamonti W; Tijerina L; Blommer M; Swaminathan R; Curry R; Ellis RD
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Nov; 65():90-104. PubMed ID: 28802464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing spatially static and dynamic vibrotactile take-over requests in the driver seat.
    Petermeijer SM; Cieler S; de Winter JCF
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Feb; 99(Pt A):218-227. PubMed ID: 27978486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of mapping characteristic on audiovisual warning: Evidence from a simulated driving study.
    Wang Y; Wu B; Ma S; Wang D; Gan T; Liu H; Yang Z
    Appl Ergon; 2022 Feb; 99():103638. PubMed ID: 34768226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Forward collision warning based on a driver model to increase drivers' acceptance.
    Puente Guillen P; Gohl I
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S21-S26. PubMed ID: 31381428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Heavy-truck drivers' following behavior with intervention of an integrated, in-vehicle crash warning system: a field evaluation.
    Bao S; LeBlanc DJ; Sayer JR; Flannagan C
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):687-97. PubMed ID: 23156615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Driving with a partially autonomous forward collision warning system: how do drivers react?
    Muhrer E; Reinprecht K; Vollrath M
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):698-708. PubMed ID: 23156616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influences of Vehicle Communication on Human Driving Reactions: A Simulator Study on Reaction Times and Behavior for Forensic Accident Analysis.
    Bauder M; Paula D; Pfeilschifter C; Petermeier F; Kubjatko T; Riener A; Schweiger HG
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 Jul; 24(14):. PubMed ID: 39065878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.