156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26264731)
1. A Rotatable Quality Control Phantom for Evaluating the Performance of Flat Panel Detectors in Imaging Moving Objects.
Haga Y; Chida K; Inaba Y; Kaga Y; Meguro T; Zuguchi M
J Digit Imaging; 2016 Feb; 29(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 26264731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality control phantom for flat panel detector X-ray systems.
Chida K; Kaga Y; Haga Y; Takeda K; Zuguchi M
Health Phys; 2013 Jan; 104(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 23192093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development of quality control system for flat-panel detectors.
Teramoto A; Kajihara T; Suzuki S; Kinoshita K; Tsuzaka M; Fujita H
Radiol Phys Technol; 2011 Jul; 4(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 21409611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Physical imaging properties and low-contrast performance of a newly developed flat-panel digital radiographic system.
Matsumoto M; Yamazaki T; Nokita M; Hayashida S; Yoshida A; Ideguchi T; Himuro K; Ohki M; Kumazawa S; Higashida Y
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Dec; 61(12):1656-65. PubMed ID: 16395242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Canon's flat-panel detector].
Matsumoto M; Sumida I; Ideguchi T; Kawaji Y; Himuro K
Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):232-45. PubMed ID: 12766269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is the image quality of conventional chest radiography obtained from a two-layer flat panel detector affected by the internal structure of the detector?
Takarabe S; Kuramoto T; Shibayama Y; Yamasaki Y; Kitamura Y; Yoshikawa H; Kato T
Phys Med; 2022 Mar; 95():176-181. PubMed ID: 35219067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of a line-pair resolution phantom for comprehensive quality assurance of electronic portal imaging devices based on fundamental imaging metrics.
Gopal A; Samant SS
Med Phys; 2009 Jun; 36(6):2006-15. PubMed ID: 19610289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The use of flat-panel detectors for CT imaging].
Kalender WA
Radiologe; 2003 May; 43(5):379-87. PubMed ID: 12764587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [An experience of the clinical study with angiography system using a Flat Panel Detector].
Okusako K; Shogaki M; Yokoyama K; Ogawa T; Tanaka K; Ichida T; Kishimoto K; Hatagawa M; Okuyama K; Kudoh H; Tanaka S; Nakamura K; Ikeda S; Suzuki K
Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 12766271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Hologic's Flat-Panel Detector].
Ogata Y; Matsumoto M; Suekane K
Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):264-75. PubMed ID: 12766272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characterization and potential applications of a dual-layer flat-panel detector.
Shi L; Lu M; Bennett NR; Shapiro E; Zhang J; Colbeth R; Star-Lack J; Wang AS
Med Phys; 2020 Aug; 47(8):3332-3343. PubMed ID: 32347561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Investigation of image quality identification utilizing physical image quality measurement in direct- and indirect-type of flat panel detectors and computed radiography].
Yokoi T; Takata T; Ichikawa K
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(11):1415-25. PubMed ID: 22104233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Super-resolution variable-dose imaging in digital radiography: quality and dose reduction with a fluoroscopic flat-panel detector.
Berliner L; Buffa A
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2011 Sep; 6(5):663-73. PubMed ID: 21298404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Investigation of image lag and modulation transfer function in fluoroscopy images obtained with a dynamic flat-panel detector.
Kawashima H; Tanaka R; Ichikawa K; Matsubara K; Iida H; Sanada S
Radiol Phys Technol; 2013 Jul; 6(2):367-74. PubMed ID: 23568338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ultra-low-dose computed tomography system with a flat panel detector: assessment of radiation dose reduction and spatial and low contrast resolution.
Nagatani Y; Nitta N; Takahashi M; Tezuka N; Nakano Y; Ikeda M; Kirino Y; Hashimoto K; Otani H; Murakami Y; Murata K
Radiat Med; 2008 Dec; 26(10):627-35. PubMed ID: 19132496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gain and offset calibration reduces variation in exposure-dependent SNR among systems with identical digital flat-panel detectors.
Willis CE; Vinogradskiy YY; Lofton BK; White RA
Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):4422-9. PubMed ID: 21859043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimal beam quality for chest flat panel detector system: realistic phantom study.
Kuwahara C; Aoki T; Oda N; Kawabata J; Sugimoto K; Kobayashi M; Fujii M; Korogi Y
Eur Radiol; 2019 Sep; 29(9):4538-4543. PubMed ID: 30737566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Technical assessment of 2D and 3D imaging performance of an IGZO-based flat-panel X-ray detector.
Sheth NM; Uneri A; Helm PA; Zbijewski W; Siewerdsen JH
Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):3053-3066. PubMed ID: 35363391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Physical imaging properties of a flat panel X-ray detector system].
Yoshida A; Nakamura S; Nishihara S; Kohama C; Takahata A; Fujikawa K
Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):246-54. PubMed ID: 12766270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using a flat-panel detector in high resolution cone beam CT for dental imaging.
Baba R; Ueda K; Okabe M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 15585803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
