These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26265094)
1. Visual Predictive Check in Models with Time-Varying Input Function. Largajolli A; Bertoldo A; Campioni M; Cobelli C AAPS J; 2015 Nov; 17(6):1455-63. PubMed ID: 26265094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prediction-corrected visual predictive checks for diagnosing nonlinear mixed-effects models. Bergstrand M; Hooker AC; Wallin JE; Karlsson MO AAPS J; 2011 Jun; 13(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 21302010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Standardized visual predictive check versus visual predictive check for model evaluation. Wang DD; Zhang S J Clin Pharmacol; 2012 Jan; 52(1):39-54. PubMed ID: 21257797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparison study of model evaluation methods: normalized prediction distribution errors vs. visual predictive check]. Ren YP; Deng CH; Wang XP; Zhou TY; Lu W Yao Xue Xue Bao; 2011 Sep; 46(9):1123-31. PubMed ID: 22121786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of visual predictive checks accounting for multimodal parameter distributions in mixture models. Arshad U; Chasseloup E; Nordgren R; Karlsson MO J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2019 Jun; 46(3):241-250. PubMed ID: 30968312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Extensions to the visual predictive check to facilitate model performance evaluation. Post TM; Freijer JI; Ploeger BA; Danhof M J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2008 Apr; 35(2):185-202. PubMed ID: 18197467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pharmacometrics: modelling and simulation tools to improve decision making in clinical drug development. Gieschke R; Steimer JL Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet; 2000; 25(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 11032091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Application of a hazard-based visual predictive check to evaluate parametric hazard models. Huh Y; Hutmacher MM J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2016 Feb; 43(1):57-71. PubMed ID: 26563504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inverse probability of censoring weighting for visual predictive checks of time-to-event models with time-varying covariates. Bartels C; Dumortier T Pharm Stat; 2021 Nov; 20(6):1051-1060. PubMed ID: 33855777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Toward Better Understanding of Insulin Therapy by Translation of a PK-PD Model to Visualize Insulin and Glucose Action Profiles. Schneck K; Tham LS; Ertekin A; Reviriego J J Clin Pharmacol; 2019 Feb; 59(2):258-270. PubMed ID: 30339268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. dOFV distributions: a new diagnostic for the adequacy of parameter uncertainty in nonlinear mixed-effects models applied to the bootstrap. Dosne AG; Niebecker R; Karlsson MO J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2016 Dec; 43(6):597-608. PubMed ID: 27730481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Population pharmacokinetic modeling and evaluation of propofol from multiple centers]. Ye HB; Zheng H; Zhang XA; Chi XJ; Chen WY; Xu JG; Li JH; Rui JZ Yao Xue Xue Bao; 2010 Dec; 45(12):1550-8. PubMed ID: 21351496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automatic data binning for improved visual diagnosis of pharmacometric models. Lavielle M; Bleakley K J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2011 Dec; 38(6):861-71. PubMed ID: 22042498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new equivalence based metric for predictive check to qualify mixed-effects models. Jadhav PR; Gobburu JV AAPS J; 2005 Oct; 7(3):E523-31. PubMed ID: 16353930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]