These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2626539)

  • 1. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of endosonic and hand instrumentation in the debridement of root canal systems.
    Glaser CG; Goerig AC; Zislis T; Pugh RJ; Luciano J
    Quintessence Int; 1989 Jul; 20(7):525-30. PubMed ID: 2626539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [SEM studies on root canal preparation using ultrasound].
    Beer R; Gängler P
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 May; 44(5):334-9. PubMed ID: 2639044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Endosonic and manual endodontics: comparative analysis of the canal using optical and electron microscopy].
    Franchi M; Lavagnoli G; Ruggeri A
    Dent Cadmos; 1986 Apr; 54(6):17-9, 21-9, 31-2 passim. PubMed ID: 3460855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Root canal preparation using ultrasound. Topographic evaluation using scanning electron microscopy].
    Auther A; Laurichesse JM; Rose H; Calas P; Launay Y
    Chir Dent Fr; 1984 Oct; 54(264):40-4. PubMed ID: 6598126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [SEM evaluation of manual endodontics and a system using ultrasonics in canal preparation].
    Curiale F; Cassaro A; Margiotta V; Buzzanca R
    Stomatol Mediterr; 1985; 5(4):407-11. PubMed ID: 3870055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A scanning electron microscope study comparing the efficacy of hand instrumentation with ultrasonic instrumentation of the root canal.
    Cymerman JJ; Jerome LA; Moodnik RM
    J Endod; 1983 Aug; 9(8):327-31. PubMed ID: 6579190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Initial penetration technic for simultaneous progressive enlargement. 2. Comparative scanning electron microscopy study of root surfaces after classic instrumentation and progressive enlargement].
    Ricci C; Laurichesse JM; Boulekbache H
    Rev Fr Endod; 1988 Jun; 7(2):53-63. PubMed ID: 3267844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Comparative SEM study of the shape of the canal after manual, mechanical, sonic and ultrasonic preparation].
    Dietschi J; Ciucchi B; Cergneux M; Holz J
    Inf Dent; 1986 May; 68(18):1687-91. PubMed ID: 3462141
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [SEM study of the surface conditions after manual, mechanical, sonic and ultrasonic canal preparation].
    Ciucchi B; Dietschi JM; Cergneux M; Holz J
    Inf Dent; 1986 May; 68(18):1693-7. PubMed ID: 3462142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ultrasonic debridement of root canals: acoustic cavitation and its relevance.
    Ahmad M; Pitt Ford TR; Crum LA; Walton AJ
    J Endod; 1988 Oct; 14(10):486-93. PubMed ID: 3255774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ultrasonic debridement of root canals: an insight into the mechanisms involved.
    Ahmad M; Pitt Ford TR; Crum LA
    J Endod; 1987 Mar; 13(3):93-101. PubMed ID: 3471836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A scanning electron microscope evaluation of root canal débridement with the endosonic ultrasonic synergistic system.
    Cunningham WT; Martin H
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 May; 53(5):527-31. PubMed ID: 6954428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hand versus ultrasonic instrumentation: its effect on canal shape and instrumentation time.
    Pedicord D; elDeeb ME; Messer HH
    J Endod; 1986 Sep; 12(9):375-81. PubMed ID: 3463644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of endosonic instrumentation in simulated curved root canals.
    Kielt LW; Montgomery S
    J Endod; 1987 May; 13(5):215-9. PubMed ID: 3473177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An in vitro comparison study to quantitate the debridement ability of hand, sonic, and ultrasonic instrumentation.
    Stamos DE; Sadeghi EM; Haasch GC; Gerstein H
    J Endod; 1987 Sep; 13(9):434-40. PubMed ID: 3482102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Scanning electron microscopic investigation of the smeared layer on root canal walls.
    Mader CL; Baumgartner JC; Peters DD
    J Endod; 1984 Oct; 10(10):477-83. PubMed ID: 6593410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of ultrasonic instrumentation in the cleansing and enlargement of the root canal.
    Yamaguchi M; Matsumori M; Ishikawa H; Sakurai T; Nakamura H; Naitoh M; Shiojima M; Kikuchi A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Mar; 65(3):349-53. PubMed ID: 3162584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ultrasonic compared with hand instrumentation: a scanning electron microscope study.
    Baker MC; Ashrafi SH; Van Cura JE; Remeikis NA
    J Endod; 1988 Sep; 14(9):435-40. PubMed ID: 3273311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of root canal debridement using saline, sodium hypochlorite, and citric acid.
    Baumgartner JC; Brown CM; Mader CL; Peters DD; Shulman JD
    J Endod; 1984 Nov; 10(11):525-31. PubMed ID: 6594419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The synergistic relationship between ultrasound and sodium hypochlorite: a scanning electron microscope evaluation.
    Cameron JA
    J Endod; 1987 Nov; 13(11):541-5. PubMed ID: 3482099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.