These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26265598)

  • 1. Spray drift reduction techniques for vineyards in fragmented landscapes.
    Otto S; Loddo D; Baldoin C; Zanin G
    J Environ Manage; 2015 Oct; 162():290-8. PubMed ID: 26265598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Decision support tools for environmentally safe use of pesticides.
    Doruchowski G; Balsari P; Marucco P; Herbst A; Wehmann HJ; Roettele M; Gil E; Codis S; Pauwelyn E
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2013; 78(2):37-45. PubMed ID: 25145224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interception of spray drift by border structures. Part 1: wind tunnel experiments.
    De Schampheleire M; Nuyttens D; Dekeyser D; Verboven P; Cornelis W; Gabriels D; Spanoghe P
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):719-22. PubMed ID: 19226819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Proposals for new spray drift exposure values in orchards and vineyards for residents and bystanders.
    Blaschke U; Felkers E; Hewitt NJ; Kluxen FM; Morgan N; Wiemann C
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2024 Jun; 150():105643. PubMed ID: 38723936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of air support on droplet characteristics and spray drift.
    Nuyttens D; Dekeyser D; De Schampheleire M; Baetens K; Sonck B
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2007; 72(2):71-9. PubMed ID: 18399426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Drift studies--comparison of field and wind tunnel experiments.
    Stadler R; Regenauer W
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(4):971-3. PubMed ID: 16628944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of the entrained air and initial droplet velocity on the release height parameter of a Gaussian spray drift model.
    Stainier C; Destain MF; Schiffers B; Lebeau F
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2006; 71(2 Pt A):197-200. PubMed ID: 17390793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measures to reduce pesticide spray drift in a small aquatic ecosystem in vineyard estate.
    Vischetti C; Cardinali A; Monaci E; Nicelli M; Ferrari F; Trevisan M; Capri E
    Sci Total Environ; 2008 Jan; 389(2-3):497-502. PubMed ID: 17936878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spray Drift from a Conventional Axial Fan Airblast Sprayer in a Modern Orchard Work Environment.
    Kasner EJ; Fenske RA; Hoheisel GA; Galvin K; Blanco MN; Seto EYW; Yost MG
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2018 Nov; 62(9):1134-1146. PubMed ID: 30346469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interception of spray drift by border structures. Part 2: field experiments.
    De Schampheleire M; Nuyttens D; Dekeyser D; Verboven P; Spanoghe P
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):723-7. PubMed ID: 19226820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spray drift reduction under Southern European conditions: a pilot study in the Ecopest Project in Greece.
    Kasiotis KM; Glass CR; Tsakirakis AN; Machera K
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 May; 479-480():132-7. PubMed ID: 24561292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spray drift as affected by meteorological conditions.
    Nuyttens D; Sonck B; de Schampheleire M; Steurbaut W; Baetens K; Verboven P; Nicolaï B; Ramon H
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(4):947-59. PubMed ID: 16628942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Off-target loss in ornamental nurseries with different spray techniques.
    Zhu H; Derksen RC; Krause CR; Zondag RH
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2009; 74(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 20218508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Real-Time Monitoring of Spray Drift from Three Different Orchard Sprayers.
    Blanco MN; Fenske RA; Kasner EJ; Yost MG; Seto E; Austin E
    Chemosphere; 2019 May; 222():46-55. PubMed ID: 30690400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Windbreaks as a pesticide drift mitigation strategy: a review.
    Ucar T; Hall FR
    Pest Manag Sci; 2001 Aug; 57(8):663-75. PubMed ID: 11517719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of natural windbreaks on drift reduction in orchard spraying.
    Wenneker M; Heijne B; van de Zande JC
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(4):961-9. PubMed ID: 16628943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spray drift mitigation using opposing synchronized air-blast sprayers.
    Van Steenwyk RA; Siegel JP; Bisabri B; Cabuslay CS; Choi JM; Steggall JW; Mace KC; Blecker SW; Poe PA; Peters-Collaer SR; Klassen P
    Pest Manag Sci; 2021 Feb; 77(2):895-905. PubMed ID: 32949089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Direct and indirect drift assessment means. Part 3: field drift experiments.
    Nuyttens D; De Schampheleire M; Baetens K; Dekeyser D; Sonck B
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):763-7. PubMed ID: 19226826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development and assessment of a novel servo-controlled spraying system for real time adjustment of the orientation angle of the nozzles of a boom sprayer.
    Bayat A; İtmeç M; Özlüoymak ÖB
    Pest Manag Sci; 2023 Nov; 79(11):4439-4450. PubMed ID: 37405577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimating ecotoxicological effects of pesticide drift on nontarget arthropods in field hedgerows.
    Otto S; Lazzaro L; Finizio A; Zanin G
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2009 Apr; 28(4):853-63. PubMed ID: 19391688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.