165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26266560)
1. An observational evaluation of a new foam adhesive dressing.
Merlin-Manton E; Greenwood M; Linthwaite A
Br J Nurs; 2015 Aug 13-Sep 19; 24(15):S21-2, S24-7. PubMed ID: 26266560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical acceptability of a dressing with matrix technology: a multisite evaluation of acute and chronic wounds.
Guthrie J; Potter R
J Wound Care; 2016 Aug; 25(8):465-9. PubMed ID: 27523658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing an adherent silicone foam dressing: a clinical evaluation across five NHS trusts.
Stephen-Haynes J; Callaghan R; Bethell E; Linthwaite A; Bullough L; Armstrong J
Br J Community Nurs; 2015 Dec; 20 Suppl 12():S32-8. PubMed ID: 26639071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A multicentre clinical evaluation of Cuticell Contact silicone wound contact layer in daily practice.
Suess-Burghart A; Zomer K; Schwanke D
Br J Community Nurs; 2015 Jun; Suppl Community Wound Care():S35-6, S38-41. PubMed ID: 26052993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical evaluation of a thin absorbent skin adhesive dressing for wound management.
Stephen-Haynes J; Callaghan R; Wibaux A; Johnson P; Carty N
J Wound Care; 2014 Nov; 23(11):532, 534, 536 passim. PubMed ID: 25375401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of wound dressings with soft silicone adhesive technology.
Morris C; Emsley P; Marland E; Meuleneire F; White R
Paediatr Nurs; 2009 Apr; 21(3):38-43. PubMed ID: 19397129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of a new, flexible lipidocolloid dressing on acute and chronic wounds: results of a clinical study.
Meaume S; Perez J; Descamps H; Voinchet V; Jault P; Saunier V; Bohbot S
J Wound Care; 2011 Apr; 20(4):180, 182-5. PubMed ID: 21537306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 150 patient experiences with a soft silicone foam dressing.
Bateman SD
Br J Nurs; 2015 Jun 25-Jul 8; 24(12):S16, S18-23. PubMed ID: 26110984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A clinical evaluation of a transparent, absorbent, adhesive wound dressing.
von Cramon L; Markowicz M; Nebendahl J; Buchinger-Kähler VC; Noah EM; Narwan M; Behrendt A; Pallua N; Steinhoff A
Br J Nurs; 2017 Nov; 26(Sup20):S46-S53. PubMed ID: 29120680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A clinical evaluation of Urgotul to treat acute and chronic wounds.
Benbow M; Iosson G
Br J Nurs; 2004 Jan 22-Feb 11; 13(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 14997068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of a foam dressing for acute and chronic wound exudate management.
Bullough L; Johnson S; Forder R
Br J Community Nurs; 2015 Sep; Suppl Wound Care():S17-8, S20, S22-4. PubMed ID: 26322401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the effectiveness of a polyhexanide and propyl betaine-based gel in the treatment of chronic wounds.
Durante CM; Greco A; Sidoli O; Maino C; Gallarini A; Ciprandi G
Minerva Chir; 2014 Oct; 69(5):283-92. PubMed ID: 25267019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective, open-label study to assess the clinical performance of a foam dressing in the management of chronic wounds.
Zoellner P; Kapp H; Smola H
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2006 May; 52(5):34-6, 38, 40-2 passim. PubMed ID: 16687768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors influencing pressure ulcer healing in adults over 50: an exploratory study.
Jones KR; Fennie K
J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2007 Jul; 8(6):378-87. PubMed ID: 17619036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality improvement evaluation of postoperative wound dressings in orthopaedic patients.
Pickles S; McAllister E; McCullagh G; Nieroba TJ
Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs; 2022 May; 45():100922. PubMed ID: 35227950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An evaluation of an adhesive hydrocellular foam dressing and a self-adherent soft silicone foam dressing in a nursing home setting.
Viamontes L; Temple D; Wytall D; Walker A
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2003 Aug; 49(8):48-52, 54-6, 58. PubMed ID: 14631663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation study of the properties of two adhesive foam dressings.
Viamontes L; Jones AM
Br J Nurs; 2003 Jun; 12(11 Suppl):S43-4, S46-9. PubMed ID: 12829978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An observational study of a superabsorbent polymer dressing evaluated by clinicians and patients.
Barrett S; Callaghan R; Chadwick P; Haycocks S; Rippon M; Stephen-Haynes J; Simm S
J Wound Care; 2018 Feb; 27(2):91-100. PubMed ID: 29424643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of a superabsorbent wound dressing, patient and clinician perspective: a case series.
Atkin L; Barrett S; Chadwick P; Callaghan R; Rippon MG; Rogers AA; Simm S
J Wound Care; 2020 Mar; 29(3):174-182. PubMed ID: 32160089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A real-life clinical evaluation of a next-generation antimicrobial dressing on acute and chronic wounds.
Walker M; Metcalf D; Parsons D; Bowler P
J Wound Care; 2015 Jan; 24(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 25543819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
