124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26267022)
1. Delivering better care and value in urological procedures.
Leow JJ; Trinh QD
Can J Urol; 2015 Aug; 22(4):7857. PubMed ID: 26267022
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. NSQIP and urology outcomes.
Frazier HA
Can J Urol; 2014 Dec; 21(6):7547. PubMed ID: 25483762
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Readmissions after major urologic cancer surgery.
Leow JJ; Gandaglia G; Sood A; Ruhotina N; Klett DE; Sammon JD; Schmid M; Sun M; Chang SL; Kibel AS; Trinh QD
Can J Urol; 2014 Dec; 21(6):7537-46. PubMed ID: 25483761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantifying Nonindex Hospital Readmissions and Care Fragmentation after Major Urological Oncology Surgeries in a Nationally Representative Sample.
Chappidi MR; Kates M; Stimson CJ; Bivalacqua TJ; Pierorazio PM
J Urol; 2017 Jan; 197(1):235-240. PubMed ID: 27460756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Racial Disparities in Surgical Outcomes Among Males Following Major Urologic Cancer Surgery.
Sathianathen NJ; Jarosek SL; Fan Y; Krishna SR; Konety BR
Am J Prev Med; 2018 Nov; 55(5 Suppl 1):S14-S21. PubMed ID: 30670197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Identification of underserved areas for urologic cancer care.
Mossanen M; Izard J; Wright JL; Harper JD; Porter MP; Daratha KB; Holt SK; Gore JL
Cancer; 2014 May; 120(10):1565-71. PubMed ID: 24523042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Major urological cancer excisions after the age of 75].
Tostain J; Preynat P; Perraud Y
Prog Urol; 1991 Dec; 1(6):1022-7. PubMed ID: 1726945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of hospital provider volume on outcome for radical urological cancer surgery in England.
Hanchanale VS; Javlé P
Urol Int; 2010; 85(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 20616525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Race and postoperative complications following urologic cancer surgery: An ACS-NSQIP analysis.
Parker DC; Handorf E; Smaldone MC; Uzzo RG; Pitt H; Reese AC
Urol Oncol; 2017 Dec; 35(12):670.e1-670.e6. PubMed ID: 28867431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Causes of hospital readmissions after urologic cancer surgery.
Schmid M; Chiang HA; Sood A; Campbell L; Chun FK; Dalela D; Okwara J; Sammon JD; Kibel AS; Menon M; Fisch M; Trinh QD
Urol Oncol; 2016 May; 34(5):236.e1-11. PubMed ID: 26712365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing the quality of the volume-outcome relationship in uro-oncology.
Mayer EK; Purkayastha S; Athanasiou T; Darzi A; Vale JA
BJU Int; 2009 Feb; 103(3):341-9. PubMed ID: 18990134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A systematic review and critique of the literature relating hospital or surgeon volume to health outcomes for 3 urological cancer procedures.
Nuttall M; van der Meulen J; Phillips N; Sharpin C; Gillatt D; McIntosh G; Emberton M
J Urol; 2004 Dec; 172(6 Pt 1):2145-52. PubMed ID: 15538220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Understanding volume-outcome relationships in nephrectomy and cystectomy for cancer: evidence from the UK Getting it Right First Time programme.
Gray WK; Day J; Briggs TWR; Harrison S
BJU Int; 2020 Feb; 125(2):234-243. PubMed ID: 31674131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Statistics of the operation at Division of Urology, Shimada Municipal Hospital: 1992-1996].
Miyakawa M; Kihara Y; Okagaki T; Matsuoka N; Hioki T; Okada T; Higashi S; Soda T; Hori D
Hinyokika Kiyo; 1997 Oct; 43(10):759-62. PubMed ID: 9395917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Is the complication rate of radical cystectomy predictive of the complication rate of other urological procedures?
Fradet V; Allareddy V; Aaronson DS; Konety BR
J Urol; 2009 Mar; 181(3):1054-9; discussion 1059-60. PubMed ID: 19150541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Incidence, risk profile and morphological pattern of lower extremity venous thromboembolism after urological cancer surgery.
Clément C; Rossi P; Aissi K; Barthelemy P; Guibert N; Auquier P; Ragni E; Rossi D; Frances Y; Bastide C
J Urol; 2011 Dec; 186(6):2293-7. PubMed ID: 22014814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Chronic kidney disease and perioperative outcomes in urological oncological surgery.
Schmid M; Ravi P; Abd-El-Barr AE; Klap J; Sammon JD; Chang SL; Menon M; Kibel AS; Fisch M; Trinh QD
Int J Urol; 2014 Dec; 21(12):1245-52. PubMed ID: 25041641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Complications of laparoscopic surgery for urological cancer: a single institution analysis.
Colombo JR; Haber GP; Jelovsek JE; Nguyen M; Fergany A; Desai MM; Kaouk JH; Gill IS
J Urol; 2007 Sep; 178(3 Pt 1):786-91. PubMed ID: 17631354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surgical practices for urological tumors: a nation-wide survey in Japan in 2005.
Kawakami S; Kihara K; ;
Int J Urol; 2009 Mar; 16(3):257-62; discussion 262. PubMed ID: 19215318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Umbilical laparoendoscopic urological surgery with a novel reusable device.
García-Tello A; Cabrera PM; Cáceres F; Ramón de Fata F; Mateo E; Angulo JC
Scand J Urol; 2014 Jun; 48(3):301-8. PubMed ID: 24446863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
