These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26267331)

  • 1. Collective intelligence meets medical decision-making: the collective outperforms the best radiologist.
    Wolf M; Krause J; Carney PA; Bogart A; Kurvers RH
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0134269. PubMed ID: 26267331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance assessment for radiologists interpreting screening mammography.
    Woodard DB; Gelfand AE; Barlow WE; Elmore JG
    Stat Med; 2007 Mar; 26(7):1532-51. PubMed ID: 16847870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Boosting medical diagnostics by pooling independent judgments.
    Kurvers RH; Herzog SM; Hertwig R; Krause J; Carney PA; Bogart A; Argenziano G; Zalaudek I; Wolf M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Aug; 113(31):8777-82. PubMed ID: 27432950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Variation in false-positive rates of mammography reading among 1067 radiologists: a population-based assessment.
    Tan A; Freeman DH; Goodwin JS; Freeman JL
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Dec; 100(3):309-18. PubMed ID: 16819566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Collective intelligence in medical decision-making: a systematic scoping review.
    Radcliffe K; Lyson HC; Barr-Walker J; Sarkar U
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 Aug; 19(1):158. PubMed ID: 31399099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How does age affect baseline screening mammography performance measures? A decision model.
    Keen JD; Keen JE
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2008 Sep; 8():40. PubMed ID: 18803871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influences of Radiology Trainees on Screening Mammography Interpretation.
    Hawley JR; Taylor CR; Cubbison AM; Erdal BS; Yildiz VO; Carkaci S
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 May; 13(5):554-61. PubMed ID: 26924162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of integrating 3D-mammography (digital breast tomosynthesis) with 2D-mammography on radiologists' true-positive and false-positive detection in a population breast screening trial.
    Bernardi D; Caumo F; Macaskill P; Ciatto S; Pellegrini M; Brunelli S; Tuttobene P; Bricolo P; Fantò C; Valentini M; Montemezzi S; Houssami N
    Eur J Cancer; 2014 May; 50(7):1232-8. PubMed ID: 24582915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters.
    Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1162-70. PubMed ID: 17652282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiologists' interpretive efficiency and variability in true- and false-positive detection when screen-reading with tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) relative to standard mammography in population screening.
    Svahn TM; Macaskill P; Houssami N
    Breast; 2015 Dec; 24(6):687-93. PubMed ID: 26433751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reactions to uncertainty and the accuracy of diagnostic mammography.
    Carney PA; Yi JP; Abraham LA; Miglioretti DL; Aiello EJ; Gerrity MS; Reisch L; Berns EA; Sickles EA; Elmore JG
    J Gen Intern Med; 2007 Feb; 22(2):234-41. PubMed ID: 17356992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists.
    Barlow WE; Chi C; Carney PA; Taplin SH; D'Orsi C; Cutter G; Hendrick RE; Elmore JG
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Dec; 96(24):1840-50. PubMed ID: 15601640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography: specialist and general radiologists.
    Sickles EA; Wolverton DE; Dee KE
    Radiology; 2002 Sep; 224(3):861-9. PubMed ID: 12202726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The problem of image interpretation in mammography: effects of lesion conspicuity on the visual search strategy of radiologists.
    Mello-Thoms C
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Dec; 79 Spec No 2():S111-6. PubMed ID: 17209115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stand-Alone Artificial Intelligence for Breast Cancer Detection in Mammography: Comparison With 101 Radiologists.
    Rodriguez-Ruiz A; Lång K; Gubern-Merida A; Broeders M; Gennaro G; Clauser P; Helbich TH; Chevalier M; Tan T; Mertelmeier T; Wallis MG; Andersson I; Zackrisson S; Mann RM; Sechopoulos I
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2019 Sep; 111(9):916-922. PubMed ID: 30834436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Association of volume and volume-independent factors with accuracy in screening mammogram interpretation.
    Beam CA; Conant EF; Sickles EA
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Feb; 95(4):282-90. PubMed ID: 12591984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving the accuracy of mammography: volume and outcome relationships.
    Esserman L; Cowley H; Eberle C; Kirkpatrick A; Chang S; Berbaum K; Gale A
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2002 Mar; 94(5):369-75. PubMed ID: 11880475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic performance of breast technologists in reading mammograms in a clinical patient population.
    van den Biggelaar FJ; Kessels AG; van Engelshoven JM; Flobbe K
    Int J Clin Pract; 2010 Mar; 64(4):442-50. PubMed ID: 20456190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. "Memory effect" in observer performance studies of mammograms.
    Hardesty LA; Ganott MA; Hakim CM; Cohen CS; Clearfield RJ; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Mar; 12(3):286-90. PubMed ID: 15766687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. National Performance Benchmarks for Modern Diagnostic Digital Mammography: Update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.
    Sprague BL; Arao RF; Miglioretti DL; Henderson LM; Buist DS; Onega T; Rauscher GH; Lee JM; Tosteson AN; Kerlikowske K; Lehman CD;
    Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 28244803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.