These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26267331)

  • 21. Understanding the Mammography Audit.
    Funaro K; Ataya D; Niell B
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2021 Jan; 59(1):41-55. PubMed ID: 33222999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Detection Accuracy of Collective Intelligence Assessments for Skin Cancer Diagnosis.
    Kurvers RH; Krause J; Argenziano G; Zalaudek I; Wolf M
    JAMA Dermatol; 2015 Dec; 151(12):1346-1353. PubMed ID: 26501400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Screening mammograms by community radiologists: variability in false-positive rates.
    Elmore JG; Miglioretti DL; Reisch LM; Barton MB; Kreuter W; Christiansen CL; Fletcher SW
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2002 Sep; 94(18):1373-80. PubMed ID: 12237283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study.
    Zackrisson S; Lång K; Rosso A; Johnson K; Dustler M; Förnvik D; Förnvik H; Sartor H; Timberg P; Tingberg A; Andersson I
    Lancet Oncol; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1493-1503. PubMed ID: 30322817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. National Performance Benchmarks for Modern Screening Digital Mammography: Update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.
    Lehman CD; Arao RF; Sprague BL; Lee JM; Buist DS; Kerlikowske K; Henderson LM; Onega T; Tosteson AN; Rauscher GH; Miglioretti DL
    Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 27918707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comprehensive Word-Level Classification of Screening Mammography Reports Using a Neural Network Sequence Labeling Approach.
    Short RG; Bralich J; Bogaty D; Befera NT
    J Digit Imaging; 2019 Oct; 32(5):685-692. PubMed ID: 30338478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Collective Intelligence Increases Diagnostic Accuracy in a General Practice Setting.
    Blanchard MD; Herzog SM; Kämmer JE; Zöller N; Kostopoulou O; Kurvers RHJM
    Med Decis Making; 2024 May; 44(4):451-462. PubMed ID: 38606597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Measurements errors in screening mammogram interpretation by radiologists].
    Ventura-Alfaro CE
    Rev Salud Publica (Bogota); 2018; 20(4):518-522. PubMed ID: 30843990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Radiologist Agreement for Mammographic Recall by Case Difficulty and Finding Type.
    Onega T; Smith M; Miglioretti DL; Carney PA; Geller BA; Kerlikowske K; Buist DS; Rosenberg RD; Smith RA; Sickles EA; Haneuse S; Anderson ML; Yankaskas B
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Nov; 13(11S):e72-e79. PubMed ID: 27814827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Improving mammographic decision accuracy by incorporating observer ratings with interpretation time.
    Saunders RS; Samei E
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Dec; 79 Spec No 2():S117-22. PubMed ID: 17209116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Computer aids and human second reading as interventions in screening mammography: two systematic reviews to compare effects on cancer detection and recall rate.
    Taylor P; Potts HW
    Eur J Cancer; 2008 Apr; 44(6):798-807. PubMed ID: 18353630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Radiologist interpretive volume and breast cancer screening accuracy in a Canadian organized screening program.
    Théberge I; Chang SL; Vandal N; Daigle JM; Guertin MH; Pelletier E; Brisson J
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2014 Mar; 106(3):djt461. PubMed ID: 24598715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Interpretive Performance and Inter-Observer Agreement on Digital Mammography Test Sets.
    Kim SH; Lee EH; Jun JK; Kim YM; Chang YW; Lee JH; Kim HW; Choi EJ;
    Korean J Radiol; 2019 Feb; 20(2):218-224. PubMed ID: 30672161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Potential of Collective Intelligence in Emergency Medicine: Pooling Medical Students' Independent Decisions Improves Diagnostic Performance.
    Kämmer JE; Hautz WE; Herzog SM; Kunina-Habenicht O; Kurvers RHJM
    Med Decis Making; 2017 Aug; 37(6):715-724. PubMed ID: 28355975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Radiologists’ Performance at Reduced Recall Rates in Mammography: A Laboratory Study.
    Mohd Norsuddin N; Mello-Thoms C; Reed W; Lewis S
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Feb; 20(2):537-543. PubMed ID: 30803217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Economic challenges in breast imaging. A survivor's guide to success.
    Feig SA
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2000 Jul; 38(4):843-52. PubMed ID: 10943281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Patient and Radiologist Characteristics Associated With Accuracy of Two Types of Diagnostic Mammograms.
    Jackson SL; Abraham L; Miglioretti DL; Buist DS; Kerlikowske K; Onega T; Carney PA; Sickles EA; Elmore JG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Aug; 205(2):456-63. PubMed ID: 26204300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Improved Cancer Detection Using Artificial Intelligence: a Retrospective Evaluation of Missed Cancers on Mammography.
    Watanabe AT; Lim V; Vu HX; Chim R; Weise E; Liu J; Bradley WG; Comstock CE
    J Digit Imaging; 2019 Aug; 32(4):625-637. PubMed ID: 31011956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Key Elements of Mammography Shared Decision-Making: a Scoping Review of the Literature.
    DuBenske LL; Schrager SB; Hitchcock ME; Kane AK; Little TA; McDowell HE; Burnside ES
    J Gen Intern Med; 2018 Oct; 33(10):1805-1814. PubMed ID: 30030738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of integrating digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D-mammography on radiologists' true-positive and false-positive detection in a population screening trial: A descriptive study.
    Bernardi D; Li T; Pellegrini M; Macaskill P; Valentini M; Fantò C; Ostillio L; Houssami N
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Sep; 106():26-31. PubMed ID: 30150047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.