These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2626881)
21. Modelling the effect of high pressure on the inactivation kinetics of a pressure-resistant strain of Pediococcus damnosus in phosphate buffer and gilt-head seabream (Sparus aurata). Panagou EZ; Tassou CC; Manitsa C; Mallidis C J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Jun; 102(6):1499-507. PubMed ID: 17578414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Requirements and implementation of a flexible kinetic modeling tool. Burger C; Buck A J Nucl Med; 1997 Nov; 38(11):1818-23. PubMed ID: 9374364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. NTP Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of Pentachloroanisole (CAS No. 1825-21-4) in F344 Rats and B6C3F1 Mice (Feed Studies). National Toxicology Program Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser; 1993 Apr; 414():1-284. PubMed ID: 12616284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A quasi-chemical model for the growth and death of microorganisms in foods by non-thermal and high-pressure processing. Doona CJ; Feeherry FE; Ross EW Int J Food Microbiol; 2005 Apr; 100(1-3):21-32. PubMed ID: 15854689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A Weibullian model for microbial injury and mortality. Corradini MG; Peleg M Int J Food Microbiol; 2007 Nov; 119(3):319-28. PubMed ID: 17904675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Use of the Weibull model for lactococcal bacteriophage inactivation by high hydrostatic pressure. Avsaroglu MD; Buzrul S; Alpas H; Akcelik M; Bozoglu F Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 Apr; 108(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 16387378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A new modelling approach to insect reproduction with same-shape reproduction distribution and rate summation: with particular reference to Russian wheat aphid. Ma ZS; Bechinski EJ Bull Entomol Res; 2009 Oct; 99(5):445-55. PubMed ID: 19159500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Making relative survival analysis relatively easy. Pohar M; Stare J Comput Biol Med; 2007 Dec; 37(12):1741-9. PubMed ID: 17582396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Modeling the concentration-response function of the herbicide dinoseb on Daphnia magna (survival time, reproduction) and Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata (growth rate). Chèvre N; Brazzale AR; Becker-van Slooten K; Behra R; Tarradellas J; Guettinger H Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2005 Sep; 62(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 15978287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. X-ray survival as Gompertz growth in number killed. Easton DM J Theor Biol; 1999 Jan; 196(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 9892550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Interactive software for estimating the efficacy of non-isothermal heat preservation processes. Peleg M; Normand MD; Corradini MG Int J Food Microbiol; 2008 Aug; 126(1-2):250-7. PubMed ID: 18571264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Asymptotic confidence bands for generalized nonlinear regression models. Cox C; Ma G Biometrics; 1995 Mar; 51(1):142-50. PubMed ID: 7766770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Multilevel modelling of clustered grouped survival data using Cox regression model: an application to ART dental restorations. Wong MC; Lam KF; Lo EC Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(3):447-57. PubMed ID: 16143989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Modeling turkey growth with the relative growth rate. Maruyama K; Potts WJ; Bacon WL; Nestor KE Growth Dev Aging; 1998; 62(4):123-39. PubMed ID: 10219703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Reflections on the use of robust and least-squares non-linear regression to model challenge tests conducted in/on food products. Miconnet N; Geeraerd AH; Van Impe JF; Rosso L; Cornu M Int J Food Microbiol; 2005 Oct; 104(2):161-77. PubMed ID: 16009440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Efficiencies of experimental designs for an illness-death model. Borgan O; Liestøl K; Ebbesen P Biometrics; 1984 Sep; 40(3):627-38. PubMed ID: 6518242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]