These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

979 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26269100)

  • 41. Where did the BLOSUM62 alignment score matrix come from?
    Eddy SR
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Aug; 22(8):1035-6. PubMed ID: 15286655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Adaptive Smith-Waterman residue match seeding for protein structural alignment.
    Topham CM; Rouquier M; Tarrat N; André I
    Proteins; 2013 Oct; 81(10):1823-39. PubMed ID: 23720362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Simulated annealing algorithm for the multiple sequence alignment problem: the approach of polymers in a random medium.
    Hernández-Guía M; Mulet R; Rodríguez-Pérez S
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2005 Sep; 72(3 Pt 1):031915. PubMed ID: 16241490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparison of the efficiency of evolutionary change-based and side chain orientation-based fold recognition potentials.
    Vishnepolsky B; Managadze G; Pirtskhalava M
    Proteins; 2008 Jun; 71(4):1863-78. PubMed ID: 18175309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. APDB: a web server to evaluate the accuracy of sequence alignments using structural information.
    Armougom F; Poirot O; Moretti S; Higgins DG; Bucher P; Keduas V; Notredame C
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Oct; 22(19):2439-40. PubMed ID: 17032685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Development and validation of a consistency based multiple structure alignment algorithm.
    Ebert J; Brutlag D
    Bioinformatics; 2006 May; 22(9):1080-7. PubMed ID: 16473868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Statistical evaluation of pairwise protein sequence comparison with the Bayesian bootstrap.
    Price GA; Crooks GE; Green RE; Brenner SE
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Oct; 21(20):3824-31. PubMed ID: 16105900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. An integrated approach to the analysis and modeling of protein sequences and structures. III. A comparative study of sequence conservation in protein structural families using multiple structural alignments.
    Yang AS; Honig B
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Aug; 301(3):691-711. PubMed ID: 10966778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Addressing inaccuracies in BLOSUM computation improves homology search performance.
    Hess M; Keul F; Goesele M; Hamacher K
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Apr; 17():189. PubMed ID: 27122148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Learning scoring schemes for sequence alignment from partial examples.
    Kim E; Kececioglu J
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2008; 5(4):546-56. PubMed ID: 18989042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A simple genetic algorithm for multiple sequence alignment.
    Gondro C; Kinghorn BP
    Genet Mol Res; 2007 Oct; 6(4):964-82. PubMed ID: 18058716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Background frequencies for residue variability estimates: BLOSUM revisited.
    Mihalek I; Res I; Lichtarge O
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Dec; 8():488. PubMed ID: 18162129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. NdPASA: a novel pairwise protein sequence alignment algorithm that incorporates neighbor-dependent amino acid propensities.
    Wang J; Feng JA
    Proteins; 2005 Feb; 58(3):628-37. PubMed ID: 15616964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. RBLOSUM performs better than CorBLOSUM with lesser error per query.
    Govindarajan R; Leela BC; Nair AS
    BMC Res Notes; 2018 May; 11(1):328. PubMed ID: 29784028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Detailed protein sequence alignment based on Spectral Similarity Score (SSS).
    Gupta K; Thomas D; Vidya SV; Venkatesh KV; Ramakumar S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():105. PubMed ID: 15850477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Detailed computational study of p53 and p16: using evolutionary sequence analysis and disease-associated mutations to predict the functional consequences of allelic variants.
    Greenblatt MS; Beaudet JG; Gump JR; Godin KS; Trombley L; Koh J; Bond JP
    Oncogene; 2003 Feb; 22(8):1150-63. PubMed ID: 12606942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Incremental window-based protein sequence alignment algorithms.
    Rangwala H; Karypis G
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jan; 23(2):e17-23. PubMed ID: 17237087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. REVCOM: a robust Bayesian method for evolutionary rate estimation.
    Bordner AJ; Abagyan R
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(10):2315-21. PubMed ID: 15749694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. High quality protein sequence alignment by combining structural profile prediction and profile alignment using SABER-TOOTH.
    Teichert F; Minning J; Bastolla U; Porto M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 May; 11():251. PubMed ID: 20470364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Pairwise protein structure alignment based on an orientation-independent backbone representation.
    Ye J; Janardan R; Liu S
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2004 Dec; 2(4):699-717. PubMed ID: 15617162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 49.