These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26269387)

  • 1. Association between a color and a manual response activation modulates the response planning of typically developing children in a subsequent Simon task.
    Coutté A; Costini O; Ferrier LP; Reymondet E; Faure S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2181-8. PubMed ID: 26269387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Eliminating the Simon effect by instruction.
    Theeuwes M; Liefooghe B; De Houwer J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Sep; 40(5):1470-1480. PubMed ID: 24884648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Between-task transfer of learning from spatial compatibility to a color stroop task.
    Marini M; Iani C; Nicoletti R; Rubichi S
    Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(6):473-9. PubMed ID: 21592943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Simon effect in action: planning and/or on-line control effects?
    Scorolli C; Pellicano A; Nicoletti R; Rubichi S; Castiello U
    Cogn Sci; 2015 Jul; 39(5):972-91. PubMed ID: 25330713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interference between nonspatial stimulus features in the Simon effect.
    Tagliabue M; Umiltà C; Spera P
    Am J Psychol; 2009; 122(4):431-53. PubMed ID: 20066924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dissociation of S-R compatibility and Simon effects with mixed tasks and mappings.
    Proctor RW; Yamaguchi M; Dutt V; Gonzalez C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):593-609. PubMed ID: 22963231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of irrelevant response dimension on stimulus response compatibility.
    Shi K; Wang L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2022 Mar; 223():103495. PubMed ID: 34999352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Increased spatial salience in the social Simon task: a response-coding account of spatial compatibility effects.
    Dittrich K; Rothe A; Klauer KC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):911-29. PubMed ID: 22528612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How different direct association routes influence the indirect route in the same Simon-like task.
    Luo C; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2019 Nov; 83(8):1733-1748. PubMed ID: 29761377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exploring handedness asymmetries in the Simon effect.
    Seibold JC; Chen J; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Feb; 78(2):437-51. PubMed ID: 26676871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Practice effects vs. transfer effects in the Simon task.
    D'Ascenzo S; Lugli L; Nicoletti R; Umiltà C
    Psychol Res; 2021 Jul; 85(5):1955-1969. PubMed ID: 32770264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Simon effect for stimulus-response duration.
    Kunde W; Stöcker C
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Apr; 55(2):581-92. PubMed ID: 12047060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simon effects in action sequences.
    Braun C; Kibele A
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Nov; 236(11):2913-2922. PubMed ID: 30076426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transfer effects of incompatible location-relevant mappings on a subsequent visual or auditory simon task.
    Vu KP; Proctor RW; Urcuioli P
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Oct; 31(7):1146-52. PubMed ID: 14704029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Asymmetrical hemispheric EEG activation evoked by stimulus position during the Simon task.
    Spironelli C; Tagliabue M; Angrilli A
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 May; 399(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 16503376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Elimination of the enhanced Simon effect for older adults in a three-choice situation: ageing and the Simon effect in a go/no-go Simon task.
    Kubo-Kawai N; Kawai N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Mar; 63(3):452-64. PubMed ID: 19575334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transfer of incompatible spatial mapping to the vertical Simon task generalizes across effectors but not stimulus features.
    Zhong Q; Proctor RW; Xiong A; Vu KL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):1-11. PubMed ID: 32140934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of short incompatible practice on the Simon effect: transfer along the vertical dimension and across vertical and horizontal dimensions.
    Conde EF; Fraga-Filho RS; Lameira AP; Mograbi DC; Riggio L; Gawryszewski LG
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Nov; 233(11):3313-21. PubMed ID: 26265123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stimulus-response compatibility for mixed mappings and tasks with unique responses.
    Proctor RW; Vu KP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Feb; 63(2):320-40. PubMed ID: 19526436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Flowers and spiders in spatial stimulus-response compatibility: does affective valence influence selection of task-sets or selection of responses?
    Yamaguchi M; Chen J; Mishler S; Proctor RW
    Cogn Emot; 2018 Aug; 32(5):1003-1017. PubMed ID: 28946804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.