These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26269553)

  • 1. Lack of depth constancy for grasping movements in both virtual and real environments.
    Bozzacchi C; Domini F
    J Neurophysiol; 2015 Oct; 114(4):2242-8. PubMed ID: 26269553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of visual and haptic feedback on grasping movements.
    Bozzacchi C; Volcic R; Domini F
    J Neurophysiol; 2014 Dec; 112(12):3189-96. PubMed ID: 25231616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Grasping trajectories in a virtual environment adhere to Weber's law.
    Ozana A; Berman S; Ganel T
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Jun; 236(6):1775-1787. PubMed ID: 29663023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Depth-cue integration in grasp programming: no evidence for a binocular specialism.
    Keefe BD; Hibbard PB; Watt SJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Apr; 49(5):1246-1257. PubMed ID: 21371484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Proprioceptive Distance Cues Restore Perfect Size Constancy in Grasping, but Not Perception, When Vision Is Limited.
    Chen J; Sperandio I; Goodale MA
    Curr Biol; 2018 Mar; 28(6):927-932.e4. PubMed ID: 29502946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of visuomotor cue integration strategies for object placement and prehension.
    Greenwald HS; Knill DC
    Vis Neurosci; 2009; 26(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 18759994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does depth-cue combination yield identical biases in perception and grasping?
    Campagnoli C; Domini F
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 May; 45(5):659-680. PubMed ID: 30920251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multiple distance cues do not prevent systematic biases in reach to grasp movements.
    Kopiske KK; Bozzacchi C; Volcic R; Domini F
    Psychol Res; 2019 Feb; 83(1):147-158. PubMed ID: 30259095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. When two eyes are better than one in prehension: monocular viewing and end-point variance.
    Loftus A; Servos P; Goodale MA; Mendarozqueta N; Mon-Williams M
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Oct; 158(3):317-27. PubMed ID: 15164152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The contribution of semantic distance knowledge to size constancy in perception and grasping when visual cues are limited.
    Wang G; Zheng C; Wu X; Deng Z; Sperandio I; Goodale MA; Chen J
    Neuropsychologia; 2024 Apr; 196():108838. PubMed ID: 38401629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The removal of binocular cues disrupts the calibration of grasping in patients with visual form agnosia.
    Marotta JJ; Behrmann M; Goodale MA
    Exp Brain Res; 1997 Aug; 116(1):113-21. PubMed ID: 9305820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Grasping after a delay shifts size-scaling from absolute to relative metrics.
    Hu Y; Goodale MA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2000 Sep; 12(5):856-68. PubMed ID: 11054927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of delay on the kinematics of grasping.
    Hu Y; Eagleson R; Goodale MA
    Exp Brain Res; 1999 May; 126(1):109-16. PubMed ID: 10333011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visuomotor priming of action preparation and motor programming is similar in visually guided and memory-guided actions.
    Seegelke C; Güldenpenning I; Dettling J; Schack T
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Oct; 91():1-8. PubMed ID: 27477631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Some binocular advantages for planning reach, but not grasp, components of prehension.
    Grant S; Conway ML
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 May; 237(5):1239-1255. PubMed ID: 30850853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Monocular vision leads to a dissociation between grip force and grip aperture scaling during reach-to-grasp movements.
    Jackson SR; Newport R; Shaw A
    Curr Biol; 2002 Feb; 12(3):237-40. PubMed ID: 11839278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pantomime-grasping: the 'return' of haptic feedback supports the absolute specification of object size.
    Davarpanah Jazi S; Yau M; Westwood DA; Heath M
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Jul; 233(7):2029-40. PubMed ID: 25869741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of grasping movements made by healthy subjects in a 3-dimensional immersive virtual versus physical environment.
    Magdalon EC; Michaelsen SM; Quevedo AA; Levin MF
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):126-34. PubMed ID: 21684505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Grip Constancy but Not Perceptual Size Constancy Survives Lesions of Early Visual Cortex.
    Whitwell RL; Sperandio I; Buckingham G; Chouinard PA; Goodale MA
    Curr Biol; 2020 Sep; 30(18):3680-3686.e5. PubMed ID: 32735814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Allocentric information is used for memory-guided reaching in depth: A virtual reality study.
    Klinghammer M; Schütz I; Blohm G; Fiehler K
    Vision Res; 2016 Dec; 129():13-24. PubMed ID: 27789230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.