These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26270337)

  • 1. Determination of Race from the Skeleton through Forensic Anthropological Methods.
    Church MS
    Forensic Sci Rev; 1995 Jun; 7(1):1-39. PubMed ID: 26270337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A pilot study on assessment of racial affinity of Sri Lankan population using discriminant function statistics and a few established morphological racial traits.
    Perera P; Pathmeswaran A
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2009 Apr; 11 Suppl 1():S182-5. PubMed ID: 19261526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A reevaluation of the sex prediction accuracy of the minimum supero-inferior femoral neck diameter for modern individuals.
    Stojanowski CM; Seidemann RM
    J Forensic Sci; 1999 Nov; 44(6):1215-8. PubMed ID: 10582359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An historical skull collection and its use in forensic odontology and anthropology.
    Sejrsen B; Lynnerup N; Hejmadi M
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2005 Dec; 23(2):40-4. PubMed ID: 16353754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy and reliability in sex determination from skulls: a comparison of Fordisc® 3.0 and the discriminant function analysis.
    Guyomarc'h P; Bruzek J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 May; 208(1-3):180.e1-6. PubMed ID: 21482050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Racial variation in the proximal and distal femur: heritability and forensic utility.
    Gill GW
    J Forensic Sci; 2001 Jul; 46(4):791-9. PubMed ID: 11451058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Metric assessment of race from the pelvis in South Africans.
    Patriquin ML; Steyn M; Loth SR
    Forensic Sci Int; 2002 Jun; 127(1-2):104-13. PubMed ID: 12098533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A study of sexual variation in Indian femur.
    Purkait R; Chandra H
    Forensic Sci Int; 2004 Nov; 146(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 15485718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Metric characterization of the human coxal bone on a recent Italian sample and multivariate discriminant analysis to determine sex.
    Vacca E; Di Vella G
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Oct; 222(1-3):401.e1-9. PubMed ID: 22770620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sexual dimorphism in human cranial trait scores: effects of population, age, and body size.
    Garvin HM; Sholts SB; Mosca LA
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2014 Jun; 154(2):259-69. PubMed ID: 24595622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anterior femoral curvature revisited: race assessment from the femur.
    Ballard ME
    J Forensic Sci; 1999 Jul; 44(4):700-7. PubMed ID: 10432602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationships between non-metric skeletal traits and cranial size and shape.
    Cheverud JM; Buikstra JE; Twichell E
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1979 Feb; 50(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 443355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sexually dimorphic pelvic morphology in South African whites and blacks.
    Patriquin ML; Loth SR; Steyn M
    Homo; 2003; 53(3):255-62. PubMed ID: 12733399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison between neural network and other metric methods to determine sex from the upper femur in a modern French population.
    du Jardin P; Ponsaillé J; Alunni-Perret V; Quatrehomme G
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Nov; 192(1-3):127.e1-6. PubMed ID: 19733989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The skull and humerus in the determination of sex: reliability of discriminant function equations.
    Robinson MS; Bidmos MA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Apr; 186(1-3):86.e1-5. PubMed ID: 19216037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An assessment of the accuracy of discriminant function equations for sex determination of the femur and tibia from a South African population.
    Robinson MS; Bidmos MA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Mar; 206(1-3):212.e1-5. PubMed ID: 21251773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sex estimation in a modern American osteological sample using a discriminant function analysis from the calcaneus.
    DiMichele DL; Spradley MK
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Sep; 221(1-3):152.e1-5. PubMed ID: 22512944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Understanding race and human variation: why forensic anthropologists are good at identifying race.
    Ousley S; Jantz R; Freid D
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2009 May; 139(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 19226647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intercondylar eminences and their effect on the maximum length measure of the tibia.
    Waxenbaum EB; Hunt DR; Falsetti AB
    J Forensic Sci; 2010 Jan; 55(1):145-8. PubMed ID: 20002260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Morphological variation in cervical spinous processes: potential applications in the forensic identification of race from the skeleton.
    Duray SM; Morter HB; Smith FJ
    J Forensic Sci; 1999 Sep; 44(5):937-44. PubMed ID: 10486945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.