211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26270748)
1. Hip Resurfacing Implants.
Cadossi M; Tedesco G; Sambri A; Mazzotti A; Giannini S
Orthopedics; 2015 Aug; 38(8):504-9. PubMed ID: 26270748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Our Experience with ICON Hip Resurfacing System].
Trč T; Šťastný E; Kopečný Z; Kos P; Přidal J; Havlas V
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2022; 89(5):323-331. PubMed ID: 36322031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Metal-on-metal surface replacement: a triumph of hope over reason: affirms.
Cuckler JM
Orthopedics; 2011 Sep; 34(9):e439-41. PubMed ID: 21902124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Equal Primary Fixation of Resurfacing Stem, but Inferior Cup Fixation With Anterolateral vs Posterior Surgical Approach. A 2-Year Blinded Randomized Radiostereometric and Dual-energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Study of Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty.
Hjorth MH; Lorenzen ND; Søballe K; Jakobsen SS; Stilling M
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Nov; 32(11):3412-3420. PubMed ID: 28641972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hip resurfacing: indications, results, and conclusions.
Hing C; Back D; Shimmin A
Instr Course Lect; 2007; 56():171-8. PubMed ID: 17472305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical and radiographic results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with a minimum ten-year follow-up.
Amstutz HC; Le Duff MJ; Campbell PA; Gruen TA; Wisk LE
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Nov; 92(16):2663-71. PubMed ID: 21084576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiographic changes of the femoral neck after total hip resurfacing.
Laffosse JM; Aubin K; Lavigne M; Roy A; Vendittoli PA
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2011 May; 97(3):229-40. PubMed ID: 21458396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Survivorship and clinical outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum ten years' follow-up.
Azam MQ; McMahon S; Hawdon G; Sankineani SR
Int Orthop; 2016 Jan; 40(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 25820838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Femoral head to neck offset after hip resurfacing is critical for range of motion.
Girard J; Krantz N; Bocquet D; Wavreille G; Migaud H
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Feb; 27(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 21925779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcomes after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: could we achieve better function?
Newman MA; Barker KL; Pandit H; Murray DW
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Apr; 89(4):660-6. PubMed ID: 18373996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compared with 28-mm diameter metal-on-metal total hip replacement: a randomised study with six to nine years' follow-up.
Vendittoli PA; Rivière C; Roy AG; Barry J; Lusignan D; Lavigne M
Bone Joint J; 2013 Nov; 95-B(11):1464-73. PubMed ID: 24151264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The mean ten-year results of metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Amstutz HC; Le Duff MJ
Bone Joint J; 2018 Nov; 100-B(11):1424-1433. PubMed ID: 30418058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The outcomes of Cormet hip resurfacing compared to standard primary total hip arthroplasty.
Costa CR; Johnson AJ; Naziri Q; Mont MA
Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2011; 69 Suppl 1():S12-5. PubMed ID: 22035478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Limited range of motion of hip resurfacing arthroplasty due to unfavorable ratio of prosthetic head size and femoral neck diameter.
Kluess D; Zietz C; Lindner T; Mittelmeier W; Schmitz KP; Bader R
Acta Orthop; 2008 Dec; 79(6):748-54. PubMed ID: 19085490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head.
Mont MA; Seyler TM; Marker DR; Marulanda GA; Delanois RE
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Nov; 88 Suppl 3():90-7. PubMed ID: 17079373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a skeptic's view.
Lachiewicz PF
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 465():86-91. PubMed ID: 17632416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Hip resurfacing: current state of knowledge].
Girard J; Lavigne M; Vendittoli PA; Migaud H
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Dec; 94(8):715-30. PubMed ID: 19070714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Changes in bone mineral density and femoral neck narrowing in the proximal femur three to five years after hip resurfacing versus conventional total hip arthroplasty.
Gerhardt DM; Smolders JM; Rijnders TA; Hol A; van Susante JL
J Arthroplasty; 2015 Feb; 30(2):308-14. PubMed ID: 25280396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Femoral component neck fracture after failed hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Bos PK; van Biezen FC; Weinans H
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1570.e1-4. PubMed ID: 21397452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impingement between the acetabular cup and the femoral neck after hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Yoo MC; Cho YJ; Chun YS; Rhyu KH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 May; 93 Suppl 2():99-106. PubMed ID: 21543698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
