286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26270750)
1. Polyaxial Screws in Locked Plating of Tibial Pilon Fractures.
Yenna ZC; Bhadra AK; Ojike NI; Burden RL; Voor MJ; Roberts CS
Orthopedics; 2015 Aug; 38(8):e663-7. PubMed ID: 26270750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical comparison of polyaxial and uniaxial locking plate fixation in a proximal tibial gap model.
Cullen AB; Curtiss S; Lee MA
J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Aug; 23(7):507-13. PubMed ID: 19633460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ability of modern distal tibia plates to stabilize comminuted pilon fracture fragments: Is dual plate fixation necessary?
Penny P; Swords M; Heisler J; Cien A; Sands A; Cole P
Injury; 2016 Aug; 47(8):1761-9. PubMed ID: 27264277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anterolateral and medial locking plate stiffness in distal tibial fracture model.
Yenna ZC; Bhadra AK; Ojike NI; ShahulHameed A; Burden RL; Voor MJ; Roberts CS
Foot Ankle Int; 2011 Jun; 32(6):630-7. PubMed ID: 21733427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical comparison of a lateral polyaxial locking plate with a posterolateral polyaxial locking plate applied to the distal fibula.
Hallbauer J; Klos K; Rausch S; Gräfenstein A; Wipf F; Beimel C; Hofmann G; Mückley T
Foot Ankle Surg; 2014 Sep; 20(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 25103705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Anterolateral Versus Medial Plating of Distal Extra-articular Tibia Fractures: A Biomechanical Model.
Pirolo JM; Behn AW; Abrams GD; Bishop JA
Orthopedics; 2015 Sep; 38(9):e760-5. PubMed ID: 26375532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The biomechanical cost of variable angle locking screws.
Tidwell JE; Roush EP; Ondeck CL; Kunselman AR; Reid JS; Lewis GS
Injury; 2016 Aug; 47(8):1624-30. PubMed ID: 27324325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of concurrent fibular fracture on the fixation of distal tibia fractures: a laboratory comparison of intramedullary nails with locked plates.
Strauss EJ; Alfonso D; Kummer FJ; Egol KA; Tejwani NC
J Orthop Trauma; 2007 Mar; 21(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 17473753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Angular stability potentially permits fewer locking screws compared with conventional locking in intramedullary nailed distal tibia fractures: a biomechanical study.
Gueorguiev B; Ockert B; Schwieger K; Wähnert D; Lawson-Smith M; Windolf M; Stoffel K
J Orthop Trauma; 2011 Jun; 25(6):340-6. PubMed ID: 21577069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of distal interlocking screw number and position after intramedullary nailing of distal tibial fractures: a biomechanical study simulating immediate weight-bearing.
Chan DS; Nayak AN; Blaisdell G; James CR; Denard A; Miles J; Santoni BG
J Orthop Trauma; 2015 Feb; 29(2):98-104. PubMed ID: 25072288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical comparison of distal femoral fracture fixation: Polyaxial vs. uniaxial locking screws with different blocking screw configurations in retrograde femoral nailing.
Batar S; Söylemez MS; Bozdağ SE; Yaman E; Kemah B; Poyanlı OS
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2024 Feb; 110(1):103695. PubMed ID: 37783426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical comparison of polyaxial-type locking plates and a fixed-angle locking plate for internal fixation of distal femur fractures.
Otto RJ; Moed BR; Bledsoe JG
J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Oct; 23(9):645-52. PubMed ID: 19897986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of 4 Methods for Dynamization of Locking Plates: Differences in the Amount and Type of Fracture Motion.
Henschel J; Tsai S; Fitzpatrick DC; Marsh JL; Madey SM; Bottlang M
J Orthop Trauma; 2017 Oct; 31(10):531-537. PubMed ID: 28657927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Polyaxial locking plate fixation in distal femur fractures: a biomechanical comparison.
Wilkens KJ; Curtiss S; Lee MA
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Oct; 22(9):624-8. PubMed ID: 18827592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical effects of angular stable locking in intramedullary nails for the fixation of distal tibia fractures.
Augat P; Hoegel F; Stephan D; Hoffmann S; Buehren V
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2016 Nov; 230(11):1016-1023. PubMed ID: 27658426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical testing of the LCP--how can stability in locked internal fixators be controlled?
Stoffel K; Dieter U; Stachowiak G; Gächter A; Kuster MS
Injury; 2003 Nov; 34 Suppl 2():B11-9. PubMed ID: 14580982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative biomechanical study for complex tibial plateau fractures: nailing and compression bolts versus modern and traditional plating.
Lasanianos NG; Garnavos C; Magnisalis E; Kourkoulis S; Babis GC
Injury; 2013 Oct; 44(10):1333-9. PubMed ID: 23601116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical comparison of bone-screw-fasteners versus traditional locked screws in plating female geriatric bone.
DeBaun MR; Swinford ST; Chen MJ; Thio T; Behn AA; Lucas JF; Bishop JA; Gardner MJ
Injury; 2020 Feb; 51(2):193-198. PubMed ID: 31703961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Calcar screw position in proximal humerus fracture fixation: Don't miss high!
Mehta S; Chin M; Sanville J; Namdari S; Hast MW
Injury; 2018 Mar; 49(3):624-629. PubMed ID: 29452734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical comparison of locked plate osteosynthesis, reamed and unreamed nailing in conventional interlocking technique, and unreamed angle stable nailing in distal tibia fractures.
Hoegel FW; Hoffmann S; Weninger P; Bühren V; Augat P
J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2012 Oct; 73(4):933-8. PubMed ID: 22710777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
