BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26270911)

  • 1. Gradient Magnitude Similarity Deviation: A Highly Efficient Perceptual Image Quality Index.
    Xue W; Zhang L; Mou X; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2014 Feb; 23(2):684-95. PubMed ID: 26270911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. VSI: a visual saliency-induced index for perceptual image quality assessment.
    Zhang L; Shen Y; Li H
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2014 Oct; 23(10):4270-81. PubMed ID: 25122572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A feature-enriched completely blind image quality evaluator.
    Lin Zhang ; Lei Zhang ; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2015 Aug; 24(8):2579-91. PubMed ID: 25915960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Universal blind image quality assessment metrics via natural scene statistics and multiple kernel learning.
    Gao X; Gao F; Tao D; Li X
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2013 Dec; 24(12):2013-26. PubMed ID: 24805219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Image quality assessment by visual gradient similarity.
    Zhu J; Wang N
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2012 Mar; 21(3):919-33. PubMed ID: 21965204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. No-reference image quality assessment using visual codebooks.
    Ye P; Doermann D
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2012 Jul; 21(7):3129-38. PubMed ID: 22410336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. FSIM: a feature similarity index for image quality assessment.
    Zhang L; Zhang L; Mou X; Zhang D
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2011 Aug; 20(8):2378-86. PubMed ID: 21292594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reduced-Reference Quality Assessment Based on the Entropy of DWT Coefficients of Locally Weighted Gradient Magnitudes.
    Golestaneh SA; Karam L
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Nov; 25(11):5293-5303. PubMed ID: 28113627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fine-Grained Quality Assessment for Compressed Images.
    Zhang X; Lin W; Wang S; Liu J; Ma S; Gao W
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2019 Mar; 28(3):1163-1175. PubMed ID: 30296227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Application-Driven No-Reference Quality Assessment for Dermoscopy Images With Multiple Distortions.
    Xie F; Lu Y; Bovik AC; Jiang Z; Meng R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2016 Jun; 63(6):1248-56. PubMed ID: 26513774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Blind image quality assessment: from natural scene statistics to perceptual quality.
    Moorthy AK; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2011 Dec; 20(12):3350-64. PubMed ID: 21521667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. VCRNet: Visual Compensation Restoration Network for No-Reference Image Quality Assessment.
    Pan Z; Yuan F; Lei J; Fang Y; Shao X; Kwong S
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():1613-1627. PubMed ID: 35081029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Image quality assessment based on multiscale geometric analysis.
    Gao X; Lu W; Tao D; Li X
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2009 Jul; 18(7):1409-23. PubMed ID: 19447715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. No-reference quality assessment for image-based assessment of economically important tropical woods.
    Rajagopal H; Mokhtar N; Tengku Mohmed Noor Izam TF; Wan Ahmad WK
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233320. PubMed ID: 32428043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptual quality metric with internal generative mechanism.
    Wu J; Lin W; Shi G; Liu A
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2013 Jan; 22(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 22910116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Blind image quality assessment using joint statistics of gradient magnitude and Laplacian features.
    Xue W; Mou X; Zhang L; Bovik AC; Feng X
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2014 Nov; 23(11):4850-62. PubMed ID: 25216482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison-Based Image Quality Assessment for Selecting Image Restoration Parameters.
    Liang H; Weller DS
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Nov; 25(11):5118-5130. PubMed ID: 27552759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Novel Image Quality Assessment With Globally and Locally Consilient Visual Quality Perception.
    Bae SH; Kim M
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 May; 25(5):2392-406. PubMed ID: 27046873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [CT image quality assessment based on prior information of pre-restored images].
    Gao Q; Zhu M; Li D; Bian Z; Ma J
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2021 Feb; 41(2):230-237. PubMed ID: 33624596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fourier transform based scalable image quality measure.
    Narwaria M; Lin W; McLoughlin I; Emmanuel S; Chia LT
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2012 Aug; 21(8):3364-77. PubMed ID: 22562758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.