283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26271246)
1. Reliability of pedigree-based and genomic evaluations in selected populations.
Gorjanc G; Bijma P; Hickey JM
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Aug; 47(1):65. PubMed ID: 26271246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficient approximation of reliabilities for single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor models with the Algorithm for Proven and Young.
Bermann M; Lourenco D; Misztal I
J Anim Sci; 2022 Jan; 100(1):. PubMed ID: 34877603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Allele frequency changes due to hitch-hiking in genomic selection programs.
Liu H; Sørensen AC; Meuwissen TH; Berg P
Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Feb; 46(1):8. PubMed ID: 24495634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Economic aspects of implementing genomic evaluations in a pig sire line breeding scheme.
Tribout T; Larzul C; Phocas F
Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Oct; 45(1):40. PubMed ID: 24127883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of selective genotyping on the response to selection using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction.
Howard JT; Rathje TA; Bruns CE; Wilson-Wells DF; Kachman SD; Spangler ML
J Anim Sci; 2018 Nov; 96(11):4532-4542. PubMed ID: 30107560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix.
Hayes BJ; Visscher PM; Goddard ME
Genet Res (Camb); 2009 Feb; 91(1):47-60. PubMed ID: 19220931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Most of the benefits from genomic selection can be realized by genotyping a small proportion of available selection candidates.
Henryon M; Berg P; Ostersen T; Nielsen B; Sørensen AC
J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(13):4681-9. PubMed ID: 23087087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genomic prediction using pooled data in a single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction framework.
Baller JL; Kachman SD; Kuehn LA; Spangler ML
J Anim Sci; 2020 Jun; 98(6):. PubMed ID: 32497209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genomic predictions can accelerate selection for resistance against Piscirickettsia salmonis in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).
Bangera R; Correa K; Lhorente JP; Figueroa R; Yáñez JM
BMC Genomics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):121. PubMed ID: 28143402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development of genomic predictions for harvest and carcass weight in channel catfish.
Garcia ALS; Bosworth B; Waldbieser G; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Lourenco DAL
Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Dec; 50(1):66. PubMed ID: 30547740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term response to genomic selection: effects of estimation method and reference population structure for different genetic architectures.
Bastiaansen JW; Coster A; Calus MP; van Arendonk JA; Bovenhuis H
Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Jan; 44(1):3. PubMed ID: 22273519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Maximizing the reliability of genomic selection by optimizing the calibration set of reference individuals: comparison of methods in two diverse groups of maize inbreds (Zea mays L.).
Rincent R; Laloë D; Nicolas S; Altmann T; Brunel D; Revilla P; Rodríguez VM; Moreno-Gonzalez J; Melchinger A; Bauer E; Schoen CC; Meyer N; Giauffret C; Bauland C; Jamin P; Laborde J; Monod H; Flament P; Charcosset A; Moreau L
Genetics; 2012 Oct; 192(2):715-28. PubMed ID: 22865733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genomic selection models double the accuracy of predicted breeding values for bacterial cold water disease resistance compared to a traditional pedigree-based model in rainbow trout aquaculture.
Vallejo RL; Leeds TD; Gao G; Parsons JE; Martin KE; Evenhuis JP; Fragomeni BO; Wiens GD; Palti Y
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Feb; 49(1):17. PubMed ID: 28148220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genetic evaluation with major genes and polygenic inheritance when some animals are not genotyped using gene content multiple-trait BLUP.
Legarra A; Vitezica ZG
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Nov; 47():89. PubMed ID: 26576649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genomic selection requires genomic control of inbreeding.
Sonesson AK; Woolliams JA; Meuwissen TH
Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Aug; 44(1):27. PubMed ID: 22898324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Boundaries for genotype, phenotype, and pedigree truncation in genomic evaluations in pigs.
Bussiman F; Chen CY; Holl J; Bermann M; Legarra A; Misztal I; Lourenco D
J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 37584978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliabilities of estimated breeding values in models with metafounders.
Bermann M; Aguilar I; Lourenco D; Misztal I; Legarra A
Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Jan; 55(1):6. PubMed ID: 36690938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Impact of Genomic and Traditional Selection on the Contribution of Mutational Variance to Long-Term Selection Response and Genetic Variance.
Mulder HA; Lee SH; Clark S; Hayes BJ; van der Werf JHJ
Genetics; 2019 Oct; 213(2):361-378. PubMed ID: 31431471
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of a Bayesian model including QTL markers increases prediction reliability when test animals are distant from the reference population.
Ma P; Lund MS; Aamand GP; Su G
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Aug; 102(8):7237-7247. PubMed ID: 31155255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mating structures for genomic selection breeding programs in aquaculture.
Sonesson AK; Ødegård J
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):46. PubMed ID: 27342705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
