146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26271493)
1. Differences between hypothetical and experience-based value sets for EQ-5D used in Sweden: Implications for decision makers.
Aronsson M; Husberg M; Kalkan A; Eckard N; Alwin J
Scand J Public Health; 2015 Dec; 43(8):848-54. PubMed ID: 26271493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does the choice of EQ-5D tariff matter? A comparison of the Swedish EQ-5D-3L index score with UK, US, Germany and Denmark among type 2 diabetes patients.
Kiadaliri AA; Eliasson B; Gerdtham UG
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2015 Sep; 13():145. PubMed ID: 26374709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of different valuation methods for population health status measured by the EQ-5D in three European countries.
Bernert S; Fernández A; Haro JM; König HH; Alonso J; Vilagut G; Sevilla-Dedieu C; de Graaf R; Matschinger H; Heider D; Angermeyer MC;
Value Health; 2009; 12(5):750-8. PubMed ID: 19490564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Crosswalk algorithms for the conversion of mean EQ-5D indices calculated with different value sets.
Nemes S; Garellick G; Salomonsson R; Rolfson O
Scand J Public Health; 2016 Jul; 44(5):455-61. PubMed ID: 27090196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Comparison of Iran and UK EQ-5D-3L Value Sets Based on Visual Analogue Scale.
Kiadaliri AA
Int J Health Policy Manag; 2017 May; 6(5):267-272. PubMed ID: 28812814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of the Swedish EQ-5D experience-based value sets in a total hip replacement population.
Nemes S; Burström K; Zethraeus N; Eneqvist T; Garellick G; Rolfson O
Qual Life Res; 2015 Dec; 24(12):2963-70. PubMed ID: 26038221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. QALY weights for diabetic retinopathy--a comparison of health state valuations with HUI-3, EQ-5D, EQ-VAS, and TTO.
Heintz E; Wiréhn AB; Peebo BB; Rosenqvist U; Levin LÅ
Value Health; 2012 May; 15(3):475-84. PubMed ID: 22583458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Swedish experience-based value sets for EQ-5D health states.
Burström K; Sun S; Gerdtham UG; Henriksson M; Johannesson M; Levin LÅ; Zethraeus N
Qual Life Res; 2014 Mar; 23(2):431-42. PubMed ID: 23975375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of United States and United Kingdom EQ-5D health states valuations using a nonparametric Bayesian method.
Kharroubi SA; O'Hagan A; Brazier JE
Stat Med; 2010 Jul; 29(15):1622-34. PubMed ID: 20209481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimating quality weights for EQ-5D (EuroQol-5 dimensions) health states with the time trade-off method in Taiwan.
Lee HY; Hung MC; Hu FC; Chang YY; Hsieh CL; Wang JD
J Formos Med Assoc; 2013 Nov; 112(11):699-706. PubMed ID: 24183199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Italian population-based values of EQ-5D health states.
Scalone L; Cortesi PA; Ciampichini R; Belisari A; D'Angiolella LS; Cesana G; Mantovani LG
Value Health; 2013; 16(5):814-22. PubMed ID: 23947975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing quality of life in a clinical study on heart rehabilitation patients: how well do value sets based on given or experienced health states reflect patients' valuations?
Leidl R; Schweikert B; Hahmann H; Steinacker JM; Reitmeir P
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2016 Mar; 14():48. PubMed ID: 27005466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of FACT- and EQ-5D-based utility scores in cancer.
Pickard AS; Ray S; Ganguli A; Cella D
Value Health; 2012; 15(2):305-11. PubMed ID: 22433762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of EQ-5D index scores derived from the US and UK population-based scoring functions.
Nan Luo ; Johnson JA; Shaw JW; Coons SJ
Med Decis Making; 2007; 27(3):321-6. PubMed ID: 17545501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An Experience-Based Value Set for the EQ-5D-5L in Germany.
Leidl R; Reitmeir P
Value Health; 2017 Sep; 20(8):1150-1156. PubMed ID: 28964448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of buprenorphine in treatment of chronic pain using competing EQ-5D weights.
Norrlid H; Dahm P; Tennvall GR
Scand J Pain; 2015 Jan; 6(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 29911578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of contemporaneous EQ-5D and SF-6D responses using scoring algorithms derived from similar valuation exercises.
Whitehurst DG; Norman R; Brazier JE; Viney R
Value Health; 2014 Jul; 17(5):570-7. PubMed ID: 25128050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The responsiveness of EQ-5D utility scores in patients with depression: A comparison with instruments measuring quality of life, psychopathology and social functioning.
Günther OH; Roick C; Angermeyer MC; König HH
J Affect Disord; 2008 Jan; 105(1-3):81-91. PubMed ID: 17532051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hispanic valuation of the EQ-5D health states: a social value set for Latin Americans.
Zarate V; Kind P; Chuang LH
Value Health; 2008 Dec; 11(7):1170-7. PubMed ID: 18489516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. People in states worse than dead according to the EQ-5D UK value set: would they rather be dead?
Bernfort L; Gerdle B; Husberg M; Levin LÅ
Qual Life Res; 2018 Jul; 27(7):1827-1833. PubMed ID: 29616427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
