These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26272367)

  • 21. Behavioral and electrophysiological investigation of semantic and response conflict in the Stroop task.
    Augustinova M; Silvert L; Ferrand L; Llorca PM; Flaudias V
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Apr; 22(2):543-9. PubMed ID: 25092389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Some further clarifications on age-related differences in the Stroop task: New evidence from the two-to-one Stroop paradigm.
    Burca M; Chausse P; Ferrand L; Parris BA; Augustinova M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Apr; 29(2):492-500. PubMed ID: 34595729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Neural correlates of stimulus and response interference in a 2-1 mapping stroop task.
    Chen A; Bailey K; Tiernan BN; West R
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 May; 80(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 21356252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The semantic Stroop effect is controlled by endogenous attention.
    Kinoshita S; Mills L; Norris D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1730-1742. PubMed ID: 29672118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Separating semantic conflict and response conflict in the Stroop task: a functional MRI study.
    van Veen V; Carter CS
    Neuroimage; 2005 Sep; 27(3):497-504. PubMed ID: 15964208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Is There Semantic Conflict in the Stroop Task?
    Burca M; Beaucousin V; Chausse P; Ferrand L; Parris BA; Augustinova M
    Exp Psychol; 2021 Sep; 68(5):274-283. PubMed ID: 34911356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Focusing on task conflict in the Stroop effect.
    Entel O; Tzelgov J
    Psychol Res; 2018 Mar; 82(2):284-295. PubMed ID: 27915364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Pupillary Stroop effects.
    Laeng B; Ørbo M; Holmlund T; Miozzo M
    Cogn Process; 2011 Feb; 12(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 20865297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparing Stroop-like and Simon Effects on Perceptual Features.
    Scerrati E; Lugli L; Nicoletti R; Umiltà C
    Sci Rep; 2017 Dec; 7(1):17815. PubMed ID: 29259275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of high-frequency rTMS of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on the resolution of response, semantic and task conflict in the colour-word Stroop task.
    Parris BA; Wadsley MG; Arabaci G; Hasshim N; Augustinova M; Ferrand L
    Brain Struct Funct; 2021 May; 226(4):1241-1252. PubMed ID: 33608822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Perceptual conflict-induced late positive complex in a modified Stroop task.
    Li G; Wang S; Duan Y; Zhu Z
    Neurosci Lett; 2013 May; 542():76-80. PubMed ID: 23416898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Auditory conflict processing: behavioral and electrophysiologic manifestations of the stroop effect.
    Henkin Y; Yaar-Soffer Y; Gilat S; Muchnik C
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010; 21(7):474-86. PubMed ID: 20807483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Response competition and response inhibition during different choice-discrimination tasks: evidence from ERP measured inside MRI scanner.
    Gonzalez-Rosa JJ; Inuggi A; Blasi V; Cursi M; Annovazzi P; Comi G; Falini A; Leocani L
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 23664841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Transitions between color categories mapped with a reverse Stroop task.
    Smithson HE; Khan SS; Sharpe LT; Stockman A
    Vis Neurosci; 2006; 23(3-4):453-60. PubMed ID: 16961980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A spatial version of the Stroop task for examining proactive and reactive control independently from non-conflict processes.
    Spinelli G; Lupker SJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 May; 86(4):1259-1286. PubMed ID: 38691237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Distinguishing response conflict and task conflict in the Stroop task: evidence from ex-Gaussian distribution analysis.
    Steinhauser M; Hübner R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1398-412. PubMed ID: 19803645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Stroop interference and the timing of selective response activation.
    Lansbergen MM; Kenemans JL
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Oct; 119(10):2247-54. PubMed ID: 18762447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Psychological distance and reaction time in a Stroop task.
    De Marchis G; Rivero Expósito Mdel P; Reales Avilés JM
    Cogn Process; 2013 Nov; 14(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 23729236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Some further clarifications on age-related differences in Stroop interference.
    Augustinova M; Clarys D; Spatola N; Ferrand L
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Apr; 25(2):767-774. PubMed ID: 29372512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The site of interference in the saccadic Stroop effect.
    Hermens F; Walker R
    Vision Res; 2012 Nov; 73():10-22. PubMed ID: 23026013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.