214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26272736)
1. CPM Test-Retest Reliability: "Standard" vs "Single Test-Stimulus" Protocols.
Granovsky Y; Miller-Barmak A; Goldstein O; Sprecher E; Yarnitsky D
Pain Med; 2016 Mar; 17(3):521-529. PubMed ID: 26272736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of CPM reliability: quantification of the within-subject reliability of 10 different protocols.
Vaegter HB; Petersen KK; Mørch CD; Imai Y; Arendt-Nielsen L
Scand J Pain; 2018 Oct; 18(4):729-737. PubMed ID: 30007061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development of a new bed-side-test assessing conditioned pain modulation: a test-retest reliability study.
Larsen JB; Madeleine P; Arendt-Nielsen L
Scand J Pain; 2019 Jul; 19(3):565-574. PubMed ID: 30920956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. User-independent assessment of conditioning pain modulation by cuff pressure algometry.
Graven-Nielsen T; Izumi M; Petersen KK; Arendt-Nielsen L
Eur J Pain; 2017 Mar; 21(3):552-561. PubMed ID: 27859944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Short-term test-retest-reliability of conditioned pain modulation using the cold-heat-pain method in healthy subjects and its correlation to parameters of standardized quantitative sensory testing.
Gehling J; Mainka T; Vollert J; Pogatzki-Zahn EM; Maier C; Enax-Krumova EK
BMC Neurol; 2016 Aug; 16():125. PubMed ID: 27495743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Psychophysical or spinal reflex measures when assessing conditioned pain modulation?
Lie MU; Petriu E; Matre D; Hansson P; Andersen OK; Zwart JA; Nilsen KB
Eur J Pain; 2019 Nov; 23(10):1879-1889. PubMed ID: 31359580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Determining Real Change in Conditioned Pain Modulation: A Repeated Measures Study in Healthy Volunteers.
Kennedy DL; Kemp HI; Wu C; Ridout DA; Rice ASC
J Pain; 2020; 21(5-6):708-721. PubMed ID: 31715262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability of the conditioned pain modulation paradigm across three anatomical sites.
Nuwailati R; Curatolo M; LeResche L; Ramsay DS; Spiekerman C; Drangsholt M
Scand J Pain; 2020 Apr; 20(2):283-296. PubMed ID: 31812949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A tonic heat test stimulus yields a larger and more reliable conditioned pain modulation effect compared to a phasic heat test stimulus.
Lie MU; Matre D; Hansson P; Stubhaug A; Zwart JA; Nilsen KB
Pain Rep; 2017 Nov; 2(6):e626. PubMed ID: 29392240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Waning of "conditioned pain modulation": a novel expression of subtle pronociception in migraine.
Nahman-Averbuch H; Granovsky Y; Coghill RC; Yarnitsky D; Sprecher E; Weissman-Fogel I
Headache; 2013; 53(7):1104-15. PubMed ID: 23594167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Test-retest reliability of pressure pain threshold and heat pain threshold as test stimuli for evaluation of conditioned pain modulation.
Kovacevic M; Klicov L; Vuklis D; Neblett R; Knezevic A
Neurophysiol Clin; 2021 Oct; 51(5):433-442. PubMed ID: 34304974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing test-retest reliability and magnitude of conditioned pain modulation using different combinations of test and conditioning stimuli.
Imai Y; Petersen KK; Mørch CD; Arendt Nielsen L
Somatosens Mot Res; 2016; 33(3-4):169-177. PubMed ID: 27650216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pro-nociceptive and anti-nociceptive effects of a conditioned pain modulation protocol in participants with chronic low back pain and healthy control subjects.
Rabey M; Poon C; Wray J; Thamajaree C; East R; Slater H
Man Ther; 2015 Dec; 20(6):763-8. PubMed ID: 25795107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Not just a matter of pain intensity: Effects of three different conditioning stimuli on conditioned pain modulation effects.
Aparecida da Silva V; Galhardoni R; Teixeira MJ; Ciampi de Andrade D
Neurophysiol Clin; 2018 Oct; 48(5):287-293. PubMed ID: 29954673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Chemo-somatosensory evoked potentials: a sensitive tool to assess conditioned pain modulation?
Kunz M; Mohammadian P; Renner B; Roscher S; Kobal G; Lautenbacher S
Somatosens Mot Res; 2014 Jun; 31(2):100-10. PubMed ID: 24568199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A large conditioned pain modulation response is not related to a large blood pressure response: a study in healthy men.
Nilsen KB; Olsen IC; Solem AN; Matre D
Eur J Pain; 2014 Oct; 18(9):1271-9. PubMed ID: 24677417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of repeated conditioning pain modulation in healthy volunteers.
Hoegh M; Petersen KK; Graven-Nielsen T
Eur J Pain; 2018 Nov; 22(10):1833-1843. PubMed ID: 29956411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lack of predictive power of trait fear and anxiety for conditioned pain modulation (CPM).
Horn-Hofmann C; Priebe JA; Schaller J; Görlitz R; Lautenbacher S
Exp Brain Res; 2016 Dec; 234(12):3649-3658. PubMed ID: 27566171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A psychophysical study of endogenous analgesia: the role of the conditioning pain in the induction and magnitude of conditioned pain modulation.
Nir RR; Granovsky Y; Yarnitsky D; Sprecher E; Granot M
Eur J Pain; 2011 May; 15(5):491-7. PubMed ID: 21035364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Delayed effects of attention on pain sensitivity and conditioned pain modulation.
Hoegh M; Seminowicz DA; Graven-Nielsen T
Eur J Pain; 2019 Nov; 23(10):1850-1862. PubMed ID: 31343803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
