580 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26273056)
1. DNA REPAIR. Mus81 and converging forks limit the mutagenicity of replication fork breakage.
Mayle R; Campbell IM; Beck CR; Yu Y; Wilson M; Shaw CA; Bjergbaek L; Lupski JR; Ira G
Science; 2015 Aug; 349(6249):742-7. PubMed ID: 26273056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A postincision-deficient TFIIH causes replication fork breakage and uncovers alternative Rad51- or Pol32-mediated restart mechanisms.
Moriel-Carretero M; Aguilera A
Mol Cell; 2010 Mar; 37(5):690-701. PubMed ID: 20227372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Segmental duplications arise from Pol32-dependent repair of broken forks through two alternative replication-based mechanisms.
Payen C; Koszul R; Dujon B; Fischer G
PLoS Genet; 2008 Sep; 4(9):e1000175. PubMed ID: 18773114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Break-induced replication and telomerase-independent telomere maintenance require Pol32.
Lydeard JR; Jain S; Yamaguchi M; Haber JE
Nature; 2007 Aug; 448(7155):820-3. PubMed ID: 17671506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pol32 is required for Pol zeta-dependent translesion synthesis and prevents double-strand breaks at the replication fork.
Hanna M; Ball LG; Tong AH; Boone C; Xiao W
Mutat Res; 2007 Dec; 625(1-2):164-76. PubMed ID: 17681555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Complex chromosomal rearrangements mediated by break-induced replication involve structure-selective endonucleases.
Pardo B; Aguilera A
PLoS Genet; 2012 Sep; 8(9):e1002979. PubMed ID: 23071463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Exploring the roles of Mus81-Eme1/Mms4 at perturbed replication forks.
Osman F; Whitby MC
DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jul; 6(7):1004-17. PubMed ID: 17409028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ctf4 Prevents Genome Rearrangements by Suppressing DNA Double-Strand Break Formation and Its End Resection at Arrested Replication Forks.
Sasaki M; Kobayashi T
Mol Cell; 2017 May; 66(4):533-545.e5. PubMed ID: 28525744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Migrating bubble during break-induced replication drives conservative DNA synthesis.
Saini N; Ramakrishnan S; Elango R; Ayyar S; Zhang Y; Deem A; Ira G; Haber JE; Lobachev KS; Malkova A
Nature; 2013 Oct; 502(7471):389-92. PubMed ID: 24025772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2- and Tel1-dependent single-strand DNA formation at DNA break promotes microhomology-mediated end joining.
Lee K; Lee SE
Genetics; 2007 Aug; 176(4):2003-14. PubMed ID: 17565964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mus81 functions in the quality control of replication forks at the rDNA and is involved in the maintenance of rDNA repeat number in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Ii M; Ii T; Brill SJ
Mutat Res; 2007 Dec; 625(1-2):1-19. PubMed ID: 17555773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Roles of SGS1, MUS81, and RAD51 in the repair of lagging-strand replication defects in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Ii M; Brill SJ
Curr Genet; 2005 Oct; 48(4):213-25. PubMed ID: 16193328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Role of PCNA and RFC in promoting Mus81-complex activity.
Sisakova A; Altmannova V; Sebesta M; Krejci L
BMC Biol; 2017 Oct; 15(1):90. PubMed ID: 28969641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Chromosomal translocations caused by either pol32-dependent or pol32-independent triparental break-induced replication.
Ruiz JF; Gómez-González B; Aguilera A
Mol Cell Biol; 2009 Oct; 29(20):5441-54. PubMed ID: 19651902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Homologous recombination and Mus81 promote replication completion in response to replication fork blockage.
Pardo B; Moriel-Carretero M; Vicat T; Aguilera A; Pasero P
EMBO Rep; 2020 Jul; 21(7):e49367. PubMed ID: 32419301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Identification and characterization of the human mus81-eme1 endonuclease.
Ciccia A; Constantinou A; West SC
J Biol Chem; 2003 Jul; 278(27):25172-8. PubMed ID: 12721304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cooperativity of Mus81.Mms4 with Rad54 in the resolution of recombination and replication intermediates.
Matulova P; Marini V; Burgess RC; Sisakova A; Kwon Y; Rothstein R; Sung P; Krejci L
J Biol Chem; 2009 Mar; 284(12):7733-45. PubMed ID: 19129197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Swi1 and Swi3 are components of a replication fork protection complex in fission yeast.
Noguchi E; Noguchi C; McDonald WH; Yates JR; Russell P
Mol Cell Biol; 2004 Oct; 24(19):8342-55. PubMed ID: 15367656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Distinct roles of Mus81, Yen1, Slx1-Slx4, and Rad1 nucleases in the repair of replication-born double-strand breaks by sister chromatid exchange.
Muñoz-Galván S; Tous C; Blanco MG; Schwartz EK; Ehmsen KT; West SC; Heyer WD; Aguilera A
Mol Cell Biol; 2012 May; 32(9):1592-603. PubMed ID: 22354996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Break-induced replication repair of damaged forks induces genomic duplications in human cells.
Costantino L; Sotiriou SK; Rantala JK; Magin S; Mladenov E; Helleday T; Haber JE; Iliakis G; Kallioniemi OP; Halazonetis TD
Science; 2014 Jan; 343(6166):88-91. PubMed ID: 24310611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
